Advertisement
Singapore markets open in 35 minutes
  • Straits Times Index

    3,343.35
    +11.65 (+0.35%)
     
  • S&P 500

    5,482.87
    +4.97 (+0.09%)
     
  • Dow

    39,164.06
    +36.26 (+0.09%)
     
  • Nasdaq

    17,858.68
    +53.53 (+0.30%)
     
  • Bitcoin USD

    61,582.85
    +682.07 (+1.12%)
     
  • CMC Crypto 200

    1,284.55
    +18.40 (+1.45%)
     
  • FTSE 100

    8,179.68
    -45.65 (-0.55%)
     
  • Gold

    2,336.90
    +0.30 (+0.01%)
     
  • Crude Oil

    81.97
    +0.23 (+0.28%)
     
  • 10-Yr Bond

    4.2880
    -0.0280 (-0.65%)
     
  • Nikkei

    39,585.20
    +243.66 (+0.62%)
     
  • Hang Seng

    17,716.47
    -373.46 (-2.06%)
     
  • FTSE Bursa Malaysia

    1,584.94
    -6.01 (-0.38%)
     
  • Jakarta Composite Index

    6,967.95
    -6,905.64 (-49.78%)
     
  • PSE Index

    6,390.58
    +77.47 (+1.23%)
     

National Vision Holdings (NASDAQ:EYE) investors are sitting on a loss of 74% if they invested three years ago

As an investor, mistakes are inevitable. But you want to avoid the really big losses like the plague. So take a moment to sympathize with the long term shareholders of National Vision Holdings, Inc. (NASDAQ:EYE), who have seen the share price tank a massive 74% over a three year period. That would certainly shake our confidence in the decision to own the stock. And the ride hasn't got any smoother in recent times over the last year, with the price 46% lower in that time. Shareholders have had an even rougher run lately, with the share price down 41% in the last 90 days.

With that in mind, it's worth seeing if the company's underlying fundamentals have been the driver of long term performance, or if there are some discrepancies.

View our latest analysis for National Vision Holdings

While markets are a powerful pricing mechanism, share prices reflect investor sentiment, not just underlying business performance. One flawed but reasonable way to assess how sentiment around a company has changed is to compare the earnings per share (EPS) with the share price.

ADVERTISEMENT

National Vision Holdings saw its share price decline over the three years in which its EPS also dropped, falling to a loss. This was, in part, due to extraordinary items impacting earnings. Due to the loss, it's not easy to use EPS as a reliable guide to the business. But it's safe to say we'd generally expect the share price to be lower as a result!

You can see how EPS has changed over time in the image below (click on the chart to see the exact values).

earnings-per-share-growth
earnings-per-share-growth

It's good to see that there was some significant insider buying in the last three months. That's a positive. On the other hand, we think the revenue and earnings trends are much more meaningful measures of the business. It might be well worthwhile taking a look at our free report on National Vision Holdings' earnings, revenue and cash flow.

A Different Perspective

National Vision Holdings shareholders are down 46% for the year, but the market itself is up 26%. Even the share prices of good stocks drop sometimes, but we want to see improvements in the fundamental metrics of a business, before getting too interested. Regrettably, last year's performance caps off a bad run, with the shareholders facing a total loss of 10% per year over five years. Generally speaking long term share price weakness can be a bad sign, though contrarian investors might want to research the stock in hope of a turnaround. It is all well and good that insiders have been buying shares, but we suggest you check here to see what price insiders were buying at.

National Vision Holdings is not the only stock insiders are buying. So take a peek at this free list of small cap companies at attractive valuations which insiders have been buying.

Please note, the market returns quoted in this article reflect the market weighted average returns of stocks that currently trade on American exchanges.

Have feedback on this article? Concerned about the content? Get in touch with us directly. Alternatively, email editorial-team (at) simplywallst.com.

This article by Simply Wall St is general in nature. We provide commentary based on historical data and analyst forecasts only using an unbiased methodology and our articles are not intended to be financial advice. It does not constitute a recommendation to buy or sell any stock, and does not take account of your objectives, or your financial situation. We aim to bring you long-term focused analysis driven by fundamental data. Note that our analysis may not factor in the latest price-sensitive company announcements or qualitative material. Simply Wall St has no position in any stocks mentioned.

Have feedback on this article? Concerned about the content? Get in touch with us directly. Alternatively, email editorial-team@simplywallst.com