Advertisement
Singapore markets open in 44 minutes
  • Straits Times Index

    3,343.35
    +11.65 (+0.35%)
     
  • S&P 500

    5,482.87
    +4.97 (+0.09%)
     
  • Dow

    39,164.06
    +36.26 (+0.09%)
     
  • Nasdaq

    17,858.68
    +53.53 (+0.30%)
     
  • Bitcoin USD

    61,608.36
    +797.71 (+1.31%)
     
  • CMC Crypto 200

    1,283.97
    +17.83 (+1.41%)
     
  • FTSE 100

    8,179.68
    -45.65 (-0.55%)
     
  • Gold

    2,337.80
    +1.20 (+0.05%)
     
  • Crude Oil

    81.93
    +0.19 (+0.23%)
     
  • 10-Yr Bond

    4.2880
    -0.0280 (-0.65%)
     
  • Nikkei

    39,341.54
    0.00 (0.00%)
     
  • Hang Seng

    17,716.47
    -373.46 (-2.06%)
     
  • FTSE Bursa Malaysia

    1,584.94
    -6.01 (-0.38%)
     
  • Jakarta Composite Index

    6,967.95
    -6,905.64 (-49.78%)
     
  • PSE Index

    6,390.58
    +77.47 (+1.23%)
     

Inghams Group Limited (ASX:ING) is favoured by institutional owners who hold 60% of the company

Key Insights

  • Given the large stake in the stock by institutions, Inghams Group's stock price might be vulnerable to their trading decisions

  • 50% of the business is held by the top 11 shareholders

  • Using data from analyst forecasts alongside ownership research, one can better assess the future performance of a company

Every investor in Inghams Group Limited (ASX:ING) should be aware of the most powerful shareholder groups. With 60% stake, institutions possess the maximum shares in the company. Put another way, the group faces the maximum upside potential (or downside risk).

Because institutional owners have a huge pool of resources and liquidity, their investing decisions tend to carry a great deal of weight, especially with individual investors. Hence, having a considerable amount of institutional money invested in a company is often regarded as a desirable trait.

ADVERTISEMENT

Let's take a closer look to see what the different types of shareholders can tell us about Inghams Group.

See our latest analysis for Inghams Group

ownership-breakdown
ownership-breakdown

What Does The Institutional Ownership Tell Us About Inghams Group?

Institutions typically measure themselves against a benchmark when reporting to their own investors, so they often become more enthusiastic about a stock once it's included in a major index. We would expect most companies to have some institutions on the register, especially if they are growing.

Inghams Group already has institutions on the share registry. Indeed, they own a respectable stake in the company. This can indicate that the company has a certain degree of credibility in the investment community. However, it is best to be wary of relying on the supposed validation that comes with institutional investors. They too, get it wrong sometimes. When multiple institutions own a stock, there's always a risk that they are in a 'crowded trade'. When such a trade goes wrong, multiple parties may compete to sell stock fast. This risk is higher in a company without a history of growth. You can see Inghams Group's historic earnings and revenue below, but keep in mind there's always more to the story.

earnings-and-revenue-growth
earnings-and-revenue-growth

Since institutional investors own more than half the issued stock, the board will likely have to pay attention to their preferences. Inghams Group is not owned by hedge funds. The company's largest shareholder is Australian Super Pty Ltd, with ownership of 9.8%. For context, the second largest shareholder holds about 6.5% of the shares outstanding, followed by an ownership of 5.4% by the third-largest shareholder.

After doing some more digging, we found that the top 11 have the combined ownership of 50% in the company, suggesting that no single shareholder has significant control over the company.

While studying institutional ownership for a company can add value to your research, it is also a good practice to research analyst recommendations to get a deeper understand of a stock's expected performance. There are a reasonable number of analysts covering the stock, so it might be useful to find out their aggregate view on the future.

Insider Ownership Of Inghams Group

The definition of company insiders can be subjective and does vary between jurisdictions. Our data reflects individual insiders, capturing board members at the very least. Company management run the business, but the CEO will answer to the board, even if he or she is a member of it.

I generally consider insider ownership to be a good thing. However, on some occasions it makes it more difficult for other shareholders to hold the board accountable for decisions.

Our data suggests that insiders own under 1% of Inghams Group Limited in their own names. It seems the board members have no more than AU$3.9m worth of shares in the AU$1.3b company. Many investors in smaller companies prefer to see the board more heavily invested. You can click here to see if those insiders have been buying or selling.

General Public Ownership

The general public, who are usually individual investors, hold a 40% stake in Inghams Group. While this size of ownership may not be enough to sway a policy decision in their favour, they can still make a collective impact on company policies.

Next Steps:

While it is well worth considering the different groups that own a company, there are other factors that are even more important. Be aware that Inghams Group is showing 2 warning signs in our investment analysis , and 1 of those makes us a bit uncomfortable...

If you would prefer discover what analysts are predicting in terms of future growth, do not miss this free report on analyst forecasts.

NB: Figures in this article are calculated using data from the last twelve months, which refer to the 12-month period ending on the last date of the month the financial statement is dated. This may not be consistent with full year annual report figures.

Have feedback on this article? Concerned about the content? Get in touch with us directly. Alternatively, email editorial-team (at) simplywallst.com.

This article by Simply Wall St is general in nature. We provide commentary based on historical data and analyst forecasts only using an unbiased methodology and our articles are not intended to be financial advice. It does not constitute a recommendation to buy or sell any stock, and does not take account of your objectives, or your financial situation. We aim to bring you long-term focused analysis driven by fundamental data. Note that our analysis may not factor in the latest price-sensitive company announcements or qualitative material. Simply Wall St has no position in any stocks mentioned.

Have feedback on this article? Concerned about the content? Get in touch with us directly. Alternatively, email editorial-team@simplywallst.com