Advertisement
Singapore markets open in 17 minutes
  • Straits Times Index

    3,343.35
    +11.65 (+0.35%)
     
  • S&P 500

    5,482.87
    +4.97 (+0.09%)
     
  • Dow

    39,164.06
    +36.26 (+0.09%)
     
  • Nasdaq

    17,858.68
    +53.53 (+0.30%)
     
  • Bitcoin USD

    61,465.51
    +511.98 (+0.84%)
     
  • CMC Crypto 200

    1,283.71
    +17.56 (+1.39%)
     
  • FTSE 100

    8,179.68
    -45.65 (-0.55%)
     
  • Gold

    2,336.30
    -0.30 (-0.01%)
     
  • Crude Oil

    81.97
    +0.23 (+0.28%)
     
  • 10-Yr Bond

    4.2880
    -0.0280 (-0.65%)
     
  • Nikkei

    39,645.76
    +304.22 (+0.77%)
     
  • Hang Seng

    17,716.47
    -373.46 (-2.06%)
     
  • FTSE Bursa Malaysia

    1,584.94
    -6.01 (-0.38%)
     
  • Jakarta Composite Index

    6,967.95
    -6,905.64 (-49.78%)
     
  • PSE Index

    6,390.58
    +77.47 (+1.23%)
     

Gibson Energy Inc. (TSE:GEI) is largely controlled by institutional shareholders who own 53% of the company

Key Insights

  • Institutions' substantial holdings in Gibson Energy implies that they have significant influence over the company's share price

  • A total of 25 investors have a majority stake in the company with 48% ownership

  • Ownership research along with analyst forecasts data help provide a good understanding of opportunities in a stock

If you want to know who really controls Gibson Energy Inc. (TSE:GEI), then you'll have to look at the makeup of its share registry. With 53% stake, institutions possess the maximum shares in the company. Put another way, the group faces the maximum upside potential (or downside risk).

Because institutional owners have a huge pool of resources and liquidity, their investing decisions tend to carry a great deal of weight, especially with individual investors. Hence, having a considerable amount of institutional money invested in a company is often regarded as a desirable trait.

ADVERTISEMENT

Let's delve deeper into each type of owner of Gibson Energy, beginning with the chart below.

Check out our latest analysis for Gibson Energy

ownership-breakdown
ownership-breakdown

What Does The Institutional Ownership Tell Us About Gibson Energy?

Institutions typically measure themselves against a benchmark when reporting to their own investors, so they often become more enthusiastic about a stock once it's included in a major index. We would expect most companies to have some institutions on the register, especially if they are growing.

We can see that Gibson Energy does have institutional investors; and they hold a good portion of the company's stock. This implies the analysts working for those institutions have looked at the stock and they like it. But just like anyone else, they could be wrong. When multiple institutions own a stock, there's always a risk that they are in a 'crowded trade'. When such a trade goes wrong, multiple parties may compete to sell stock fast. This risk is higher in a company without a history of growth. You can see Gibson Energy's historic earnings and revenue below, but keep in mind there's always more to the story.

earnings-and-revenue-growth
earnings-and-revenue-growth

Institutional investors own over 50% of the company, so together than can probably strongly influence board decisions. Gibson Energy is not owned by hedge funds. The company's largest shareholder is M&G Investment Management Limited, with ownership of 18%. RBC Global Asset Management Inc. is the second largest shareholder owning 3.6% of common stock, and CIBC Asset Management Inc. holds about 3.6% of the company stock.

On studying our ownership data, we found that 25 of the top shareholders collectively own less than 50% of the share register, implying that no single individual has a majority interest.

While studying institutional ownership for a company can add value to your research, it is also a good practice to research analyst recommendations to get a deeper understand of a stock's expected performance. Quite a few analysts cover the stock, so you could look into forecast growth quite easily.

Insider Ownership Of Gibson Energy

While the precise definition of an insider can be subjective, almost everyone considers board members to be insiders. Company management run the business, but the CEO will answer to the board, even if he or she is a member of it.

I generally consider insider ownership to be a good thing. However, on some occasions it makes it more difficult for other shareholders to hold the board accountable for decisions.

Our data suggests that insiders own under 1% of Gibson Energy Inc. in their own names. It's a big company, so even a small proportional interest can create alignment between the board and shareholders. In this case insiders own CA$26m worth of shares. Arguably, recent buying and selling is just as important to consider. You can click here to see if insiders have been buying or selling.

General Public Ownership

The general public-- including retail investors -- own 47% stake in the company, and hence can't easily be ignored. While this group can't necessarily call the shots, it can certainly have a real influence on how the company is run.

Next Steps:

It's always worth thinking about the different groups who own shares in a company. But to understand Gibson Energy better, we need to consider many other factors. Take risks for example - Gibson Energy has 4 warning signs (and 1 which is potentially serious) we think you should know about.

Ultimately the future is most important. You can access this free report on analyst forecasts for the company.

NB: Figures in this article are calculated using data from the last twelve months, which refer to the 12-month period ending on the last date of the month the financial statement is dated. This may not be consistent with full year annual report figures.

Have feedback on this article? Concerned about the content? Get in touch with us directly. Alternatively, email editorial-team (at) simplywallst.com.

This article by Simply Wall St is general in nature. We provide commentary based on historical data and analyst forecasts only using an unbiased methodology and our articles are not intended to be financial advice. It does not constitute a recommendation to buy or sell any stock, and does not take account of your objectives, or your financial situation. We aim to bring you long-term focused analysis driven by fundamental data. Note that our analysis may not factor in the latest price-sensitive company announcements or qualitative material. Simply Wall St has no position in any stocks mentioned.

Have feedback on this article? Concerned about the content? Get in touch with us directly. Alternatively, email editorial-team@simplywallst.com