Nuveen Municipal Value Fund, Inc. (NUV)

8.56 +0.06 (+0.71%) At close: 04:00PM EDT

Nuveen Municipal Value Fund, Inc.

333 West Wacker Drive
Chicago, IL 60606-1220
United States
312 917 7700
https://www.nuveen.com/CEF/Product/Overview.aspx?FundCode=NUV&refsrc=vu_nuveen.com/nuv

Sector(s): Financial Services
Industry: Asset Management
Full-time employees: 

Key executives

Name	Title	Pay	Exercised	Year born
Mr. Nathaniel T. Jones	VP & Treasurer	N/A	N/A	1979
Mr. Thomas C. Spalding Jr., C.F.A.	Portfolio Manager	N/A	N/A	1962
Mr. Daniel S. Solender CFA	Portfolio Manager	N/A	N/A	1967
Mr. Johnathan N. Wilhelm	Portfolio Manager	N/A	N/A	N/A

Amounts are as of , and compensation values are for the last fiscal year ending on that date. Pay includes salary, bonuses, etc. Exercised is the value of options exercised during the fiscal year. Currency in USD.

Description

Nuveen Municipal Value Fund, Inc. is a closed-ended fixed income mutual fund launched by Nuveen Investments, Inc. The fund is co-managed by Nuveen Fund Advisors LLC and Nuveen Asset Management, LLC. It invests in the fixed income markets of the United States. The fund also invests some portion of its portfolio in derivative instruments. It invests in undervalued municipal securities and other related investments the income, exempt from regular federal income taxes that are rated Baa or BBB or better. It employs fundamental analysis with bottom-up stock picking approach to create its portfolio. The fund benchmarks the performance of its portfolio against the Standard & Poor's (S&P) National Municipal Bond Index. Nuveen Municipal Value Fund, Inc. was formed on April 8, 1987 and is domiciled in the United States.

Corporate governance

Nuveen Municipal Value Fund, Inc.’s ISS governance QualityScore as of N/A is N/A. The pillar scores are Audit: N/A; Board: N/A; Shareholder rights: N/A; Compensation: N/A.

Corporate governance scores courtesy of Institutional Shareholder Services (ISS). Scores indicate decile rank relative to index or region. A decile score of 1 indicates lower governance risk, while 10 indicates higher governance risk.