China Conch Environment Protection Holdings Limited (0587.HK)

0.960 +0.020 (+2.13%) At close: 04:08PM HKT

China Conch Environment Protection Holdings Limited

Wuhu Conch International Conference Ctr
No. 1005, South Jiuhua Road Yijiang District
Wuhu 241070
China
86 55 3835 2886
https://www.conchenviro.com

Sector(s): Industrials
Industry: Waste Management
Full-time employees: 3,539

Key executives

Name	Title	Pay	Exercised	Year born
Mr. Xiaobo Li	General Manager & Executive Director	150.55k	N/A	1970
Mr. Zhan Fan	Executive Director	N/A	N/A	1985
Ms. Dan Liao	Joint Company Secretary & Executive Director	792.29k	N/A	1980
Mr. Changbao Wan	Executive Deputy GM	987.89k	N/A	1981
Mr. Keke Zhang	Deputy General Manager	1.84M	N/A	1963
Mr. Jianli Wang	Chief Engineer	N/A	N/A	1964
Mr. Leong Yin Lee	Joint Company Secretary	N/A	N/A	N/A

Amounts are as of 31 December 2022, and compensation values are for the last fiscal year ending on that date. Pay includes salary, bonuses, etc. Exercised is the value of options exercised during the fiscal year. Currency in HKD.

Description

China Conch Environment Protection Holdings Limited, an investment holding company, provides treatment solutions for industrial solid and hazardous waste primarily utilizing cement kiln waste treatment technologies in the People's Republic of China. It also provides fly ash, oil sludge, and dry distillation treatment solutions; and municipal sludge disposal solutions. In addition, the company offers logistic services for solid and hazardous waste; and resource recycling and technical consultation services. The company was incorporated in 2020 and is headquartered in Wuhu, China.

Corporate governance

China Conch Environment Protection Holdings Limited’s ISS governance QualityScore as of N/A is N/A. The pillar scores are Audit: N/A; Board: N/A; Shareholder rights: N/A; Compensation: N/A.

Corporate governance scores courtesy of Institutional Shareholder Services (ISS). Scores indicate decile rank relative to index or region. A decile score of 1 indicates lower governance risk, while 10 indicates higher governance risk.