Advertisement
Singapore markets open in 6 hours 18 minutes
  • Straits Times Index

    3,331.70
    +5.42 (+0.16%)
     
  • S&P 500

    5,464.35
    -4.95 (-0.09%)
     
  • Dow

    39,133.30
    +21.14 (+0.05%)
     
  • Nasdaq

    17,743.03
    +25.37 (+0.14%)
     
  • Bitcoin USD

    60,943.66
    -995.80 (-1.61%)
     
  • CMC Crypto 200

    1,268.15
    -15.64 (-1.22%)
     
  • FTSE 100

    8,225.33
    -22.46 (-0.27%)
     
  • Gold

    2,312.30
    -18.50 (-0.79%)
     
  • Crude Oil

    80.88
    +0.05 (+0.06%)
     
  • 10-Yr Bond

    4.3180
    +0.0800 (+1.89%)
     
  • Nikkei

    39,667.07
    +493.92 (+1.26%)
     
  • Hang Seng

    18,089.93
    +17.03 (+0.09%)
     
  • FTSE Bursa Malaysia

    1,590.95
    +5.57 (+0.35%)
     
  • Jakarta Composite Index

    6,905.64
    +22.94 (+0.33%)
     
  • PSE Index

    6,313.11
    +14.06 (+0.22%)
     

While private equity firms own 21% of I-Mab (NASDAQ:IMAB), retail investors are its largest shareholders with 59% ownership

Key Insights

  • Significant control over I-Mab by retail investors implies that the general public has more power to influence management and governance-related decisions

  • A total of 25 investors have a majority stake in the company with 40% ownership

  • Using data from analyst forecasts alongside ownership research, one can better assess the future performance of a company

To get a sense of who is truly in control of I-Mab (NASDAQ:IMAB), it is important to understand the ownership structure of the business. The group holding the most number of shares in the company, around 59% to be precise, is retail investors. In other words, the group stands to gain the most (or lose the most) from their investment into the company.

And private equity firms on the other hand have a 21% ownership in the company.

ADVERTISEMENT

Let's take a closer look to see what the different types of shareholders can tell us about I-Mab.

View our latest analysis for I-Mab

ownership-breakdown
ownership-breakdown

What Does The Institutional Ownership Tell Us About I-Mab?

Many institutions measure their performance against an index that approximates the local market. So they usually pay more attention to companies that are included in major indices.

We can see that I-Mab does have institutional investors; and they hold a good portion of the company's stock. This can indicate that the company has a certain degree of credibility in the investment community. However, it is best to be wary of relying on the supposed validation that comes with institutional investors. They too, get it wrong sometimes. It is not uncommon to see a big share price drop if two large institutional investors try to sell out of a stock at the same time. So it is worth checking the past earnings trajectory of I-Mab, (below). Of course, keep in mind that there are other factors to consider, too.

earnings-and-revenue-growth
earnings-and-revenue-growth

We note that hedge funds don't have a meaningful investment in I-Mab. Looking at our data, we can see that the largest shareholder is CBC Group with 13% of shares outstanding. Meanwhile, the second and third largest shareholders, hold 8.6% and 5.1%, of the shares outstanding, respectively.

On studying our ownership data, we found that 25 of the top shareholders collectively own less than 50% of the share register, implying that no single individual has a majority interest.

Researching institutional ownership is a good way to gauge and filter a stock's expected performance. The same can be achieved by studying analyst sentiments. Quite a few analysts cover the stock, so you could look into forecast growth quite easily.

Insider Ownership Of I-Mab

The definition of an insider can differ slightly between different countries, but members of the board of directors always count. The company management answer to the board and the latter should represent the interests of shareholders. Notably, sometimes top-level managers are on the board themselves.

I generally consider insider ownership to be a good thing. However, on some occasions it makes it more difficult for other shareholders to hold the board accountable for decisions.

We can report that insiders do own shares in I-Mab. In their own names, insiders own US$7.8m worth of stock in the US$153m company. It is good to see some investment by insiders, but we usually like to see higher insider holdings. It might be worth checking if those insiders have been buying.

General Public Ownership

The general public, mostly comprising of individual investors, collectively holds 59% of I-Mab shares. This level of ownership gives investors from the wider public some power to sway key policy decisions such as board composition, executive compensation, and the dividend payout ratio.

Private Equity Ownership

With a stake of 21%, private equity firms could influence the I-Mab board. Sometimes we see private equity stick around for the long term, but generally speaking they have a shorter investment horizon and -- as the name suggests -- don't invest in public companies much. After some time they may look to sell and redeploy capital elsewhere.

Private Company Ownership

It seems that Private Companies own 4.4%, of the I-Mab stock. Private companies may be related parties. Sometimes insiders have an interest in a public company through a holding in a private company, rather than in their own capacity as an individual. While it's hard to draw any broad stroke conclusions, it is worth noting as an area for further research.

Public Company Ownership

We can see that public companies hold 3.3% of the I-Mab shares on issue. This may be a strategic interest and the two companies may have related business interests. It could be that they have de-merged. This holding is probably worth investigating further.

Next Steps:

I find it very interesting to look at who exactly owns a company. But to truly gain insight, we need to consider other information, too. To that end, you should be aware of the 2 warning signs we've spotted with I-Mab .

But ultimately it is the future, not the past, that will determine how well the owners of this business will do. Therefore we think it advisable to take a look at this free report showing whether analysts are predicting a brighter future.

NB: Figures in this article are calculated using data from the last twelve months, which refer to the 12-month period ending on the last date of the month the financial statement is dated. This may not be consistent with full year annual report figures.

Have feedback on this article? Concerned about the content? Get in touch with us directly. Alternatively, email editorial-team (at) simplywallst.com.

This article by Simply Wall St is general in nature. We provide commentary based on historical data and analyst forecasts only using an unbiased methodology and our articles are not intended to be financial advice. It does not constitute a recommendation to buy or sell any stock, and does not take account of your objectives, or your financial situation. We aim to bring you long-term focused analysis driven by fundamental data. Note that our analysis may not factor in the latest price-sensitive company announcements or qualitative material. Simply Wall St has no position in any stocks mentioned.