Advertisement
Singapore markets closed
  • Straits Times Index

    3,410.81
    -29.07 (-0.85%)
     
  • Nikkei

    40,912.37
    -1.28 (-0.00%)
     
  • Hang Seng

    17,799.61
    -228.67 (-1.27%)
     
  • FTSE 100

    8,203.93
    -37.33 (-0.45%)
     
  • Bitcoin USD

    56,826.98
    -237.26 (-0.42%)
     
  • CMC Crypto 200

    1,174.55
    -34.15 (-2.82%)
     
  • S&P 500

    5,567.19
    +30.17 (+0.54%)
     
  • Dow

    39,375.87
    +67.87 (+0.17%)
     
  • Nasdaq

    18,352.76
    +164.46 (+0.90%)
     
  • Gold

    2,399.80
    +30.40 (+1.28%)
     
  • Crude Oil

    83.44
    -0.44 (-0.52%)
     
  • 10-Yr Bond

    4.2720
    -0.0830 (-1.91%)
     
  • FTSE Bursa Malaysia

    1,611.02
    -5.73 (-0.35%)
     
  • Jakarta Composite Index

    7,253.37
    +32.48 (+0.45%)
     
  • PSE Index

    6,492.75
    -14.74 (-0.23%)
     

These Return Metrics Don't Make Klingelnberg (VTX:KLIN) Look Too Strong

When researching a stock for investment, what can tell us that the company is in decline? When we see a declining return on capital employed (ROCE) in conjunction with a declining base of capital employed, that's often how a mature business shows signs of aging. Basically the company is earning less on its investments and it is also reducing its total assets. So after glancing at the trends within Klingelnberg (VTX:KLIN), we weren't too hopeful.

Return On Capital Employed (ROCE): What Is It?

If you haven't worked with ROCE before, it measures the 'return' (pre-tax profit) a company generates from capital employed in its business. Analysts use this formula to calculate it for Klingelnberg:

Return on Capital Employed = Earnings Before Interest and Tax (EBIT) ÷ (Total Assets - Current Liabilities)

0.057 = €8.7m ÷ (€286m - €134m) (Based on the trailing twelve months to September 2023).

ADVERTISEMENT

Therefore, Klingelnberg has an ROCE of 5.7%. Ultimately, that's a low return and it under-performs the Machinery industry average of 15%.

Check out our latest analysis for Klingelnberg

roce
roce

Above you can see how the current ROCE for Klingelnberg compares to its prior returns on capital, but there's only so much you can tell from the past. If you're interested, you can view the analysts predictions in our free analyst report for Klingelnberg .

What Can We Tell From Klingelnberg's ROCE Trend?

We are a bit worried about the trend of returns on capital at Klingelnberg. To be more specific, the ROCE was 14% five years ago, but since then it has dropped noticeably. On top of that, it's worth noting that the amount of capital employed within the business has remained relatively steady. Companies that exhibit these attributes tend to not be shrinking, but they can be mature and facing pressure on their margins from competition. If these trends continue, we wouldn't expect Klingelnberg to turn into a multi-bagger.

On a side note, Klingelnberg's current liabilities have increased over the last five years to 47% of total assets, effectively distorting the ROCE to some degree. Without this increase, it's likely that ROCE would be even lower than 5.7%. And with current liabilities at these levels, suppliers or short-term creditors are effectively funding a large part of the business, which can introduce some risks.

Our Take On Klingelnberg's ROCE

In the end, the trend of lower returns on the same amount of capital isn't typically an indication that we're looking at a growth stock. Long term shareholders who've owned the stock over the last five years have experienced a 50% depreciation in their investment, so it appears the market might not like these trends either. That being the case, unless the underlying trends revert to a more positive trajectory, we'd consider looking elsewhere.

On a final note, we've found 2 warning signs for Klingelnberg that we think you should be aware of.

While Klingelnberg may not currently earn the highest returns, we've compiled a list of companies that currently earn more than 25% return on equity. Check out this free list here.

Have feedback on this article? Concerned about the content? Get in touch with us directly. Alternatively, email editorial-team (at) simplywallst.com.

This article by Simply Wall St is general in nature. We provide commentary based on historical data and analyst forecasts only using an unbiased methodology and our articles are not intended to be financial advice. It does not constitute a recommendation to buy or sell any stock, and does not take account of your objectives, or your financial situation. We aim to bring you long-term focused analysis driven by fundamental data. Note that our analysis may not factor in the latest price-sensitive company announcements or qualitative material. Simply Wall St has no position in any stocks mentioned.