Advertisement
Singapore markets close in 1 hour 15 minutes
  • Straits Times Index

    3,337.86
    +5.06 (+0.15%)
     
  • Nikkei

    39,631.06
    +47.98 (+0.12%)
     
  • Hang Seng

    17,718.61
    +2.11 (+0.01%)
     
  • FTSE 100

    8,189.00
    +24.88 (+0.30%)
     
  • Bitcoin USD

    63,241.75
    +1,745.14 (+2.84%)
     
  • CMC Crypto 200

    1,312.11
    +10.04 (+0.77%)
     
  • S&P 500

    5,460.48
    -22.39 (-0.41%)
     
  • Dow

    39,118.86
    -45.24 (-0.12%)
     
  • Nasdaq

    17,732.60
    -126.10 (-0.71%)
     
  • Gold

    2,334.80
    -4.80 (-0.21%)
     
  • Crude Oil

    82.20
    +0.66 (+0.81%)
     
  • 10-Yr Bond

    4.3430
    +0.0550 (+1.28%)
     
  • FTSE Bursa Malaysia

    1,596.20
    +6.11 (+0.38%)
     
  • Jakarta Composite Index

    7,109.90
    +46.32 (+0.66%)
     
  • PSE Index

    6,398.77
    -13.14 (-0.20%)
     

Retail investors account for 46% of Richards Packaging Income Fund's (TSE:RPI.UN) ownership, while institutions account for 27%

Key Insights

  • The considerable ownership by retail investors in Richards Packaging Income Fund indicates that they collectively have a greater say in management and business strategy

  • The top 8 shareholders own 50% of the company

  • Insiders have been buying lately

Every investor in Richards Packaging Income Fund (TSE:RPI.UN) should be aware of the most powerful shareholder groups. With 46% stake, retail investors possess the maximum shares in the company. That is, the group stands to benefit the most if the stock rises (or lose the most if there is a downturn).

Institutions, on the other hand, account for 27% of the company's stockholders. Generally speaking, as a company grows, institutions will increase their ownership. Conversely, insiders often decrease their ownership over time.

ADVERTISEMENT

Let's delve deeper into each type of owner of Richards Packaging Income Fund, beginning with the chart below.

See our latest analysis for Richards Packaging Income Fund

ownership-breakdown
ownership-breakdown

What Does The Institutional Ownership Tell Us About Richards Packaging Income Fund?

Many institutions measure their performance against an index that approximates the local market. So they usually pay more attention to companies that are included in major indices.

We can see that Richards Packaging Income Fund does have institutional investors; and they hold a good portion of the company's stock. This suggests some credibility amongst professional investors. But we can't rely on that fact alone since institutions make bad investments sometimes, just like everyone does. When multiple institutions own a stock, there's always a risk that they are in a 'crowded trade'. When such a trade goes wrong, multiple parties may compete to sell stock fast. This risk is higher in a company without a history of growth. You can see Richards Packaging Income Fund's historic earnings and revenue below, but keep in mind there's always more to the story.

earnings-and-revenue-growth
earnings-and-revenue-growth

We note that hedge funds don't have a meaningful investment in Richards Packaging Income Fund. Our data shows that Gerard Glynn is the largest shareholder with 20% of shares outstanding. Mawer Investment Management Ltd. is the second largest shareholder owning 12% of common stock, and David Prupas holds about 5.4% of the company stock.

We did some more digging and found that 8 of the top shareholders account for roughly 50% of the register, implying that along with larger shareholders, there are a few smaller shareholders, thereby balancing out each others interests somewhat.

While it makes sense to study institutional ownership data for a company, it also makes sense to study analyst sentiments to know which way the wind is blowing. There is some analyst coverage of the stock, but it could still become more well known, with time.

Insider Ownership Of Richards Packaging Income Fund

The definition of an insider can differ slightly between different countries, but members of the board of directors always count. The company management answer to the board and the latter should represent the interests of shareholders. Notably, sometimes top-level managers are on the board themselves.

Insider ownership is positive when it signals leadership are thinking like the true owners of the company. However, high insider ownership can also give immense power to a small group within the company. This can be negative in some circumstances.

It seems insiders own a significant proportion of Richards Packaging Income Fund. Insiders own CA$98m worth of shares in the CA$371m company. This may suggest that the founders still own a lot of shares. You can click here to see if they have been buying or selling.

General Public Ownership

The general public, who are usually individual investors, hold a 46% stake in Richards Packaging Income Fund. This size of ownership, while considerable, may not be enough to change company policy if the decision is not in sync with other large shareholders.

Next Steps:

I find it very interesting to look at who exactly owns a company. But to truly gain insight, we need to consider other information, too.

Many find it useful to take an in depth look at how a company has performed in the past. You can access this detailed graph of past earnings, revenue and cash flow.

But ultimately it is the future, not the past, that will determine how well the owners of this business will do. Therefore we think it advisable to take a look at this free report showing whether analysts are predicting a brighter future.

NB: Figures in this article are calculated using data from the last twelve months, which refer to the 12-month period ending on the last date of the month the financial statement is dated. This may not be consistent with full year annual report figures.

Have feedback on this article? Concerned about the content? Get in touch with us directly. Alternatively, email editorial-team (at) simplywallst.com.

This article by Simply Wall St is general in nature. We provide commentary based on historical data and analyst forecasts only using an unbiased methodology and our articles are not intended to be financial advice. It does not constitute a recommendation to buy or sell any stock, and does not take account of your objectives, or your financial situation. We aim to bring you long-term focused analysis driven by fundamental data. Note that our analysis may not factor in the latest price-sensitive company announcements or qualitative material. Simply Wall St has no position in any stocks mentioned.