Advertisement
Singapore markets close in 3 hours 28 minutes
  • Straits Times Index

    3,357.30
    +18.73 (+0.56%)
     
  • Nikkei

    40,042.78
    +411.72 (+1.04%)
     
  • Hang Seng

    17,798.76
    +80.15 (+0.45%)
     
  • FTSE 100

    8,166.76
    +2.64 (+0.03%)
     
  • Bitcoin USD

    63,002.48
    -319.89 (-0.51%)
     
  • CMC Crypto 200

    1,345.43
    +43.36 (+3.33%)
     
  • S&P 500

    5,475.09
    +14.61 (+0.27%)
     
  • Dow

    39,169.52
    +50.66 (+0.13%)
     
  • Nasdaq

    17,879.30
    +146.70 (+0.83%)
     
  • Gold

    2,337.90
    -1.00 (-0.04%)
     
  • Crude Oil

    83.52
    +0.14 (+0.17%)
     
  • 10-Yr Bond

    4.4790
    +0.1360 (+3.13%)
     
  • FTSE Bursa Malaysia

    1,599.47
    +1.27 (+0.08%)
     
  • Jakarta Composite Index

    7,150.36
    +10.73 (+0.15%)
     
  • PSE Index

    6,391.07
    -7.70 (-0.12%)
     

Raffles Medical Group Ltd (SGX:BSL) stock most popular amongst private companies who own 42%, while individual investors hold 28%

Key Insights

  • The considerable ownership by private companies in Raffles Medical Group indicates that they collectively have a greater say in management and business strategy

  • A total of 2 investors have a majority stake in the company with 51% ownership

  • Insiders have bought recently

Every investor in Raffles Medical Group Ltd (SGX:BSL) should be aware of the most powerful shareholder groups. The group holding the most number of shares in the company, around 42% to be precise, is private companies. Put another way, the group faces the maximum upside potential (or downside risk).

Individual investors, on the other hand, account for 28% of the company's stockholders.

ADVERTISEMENT

Let's delve deeper into each type of owner of Raffles Medical Group, beginning with the chart below.

See our latest analysis for Raffles Medical Group

ownership-breakdown
ownership-breakdown

What Does The Institutional Ownership Tell Us About Raffles Medical Group?

Institutional investors commonly compare their own returns to the returns of a commonly followed index. So they generally do consider buying larger companies that are included in the relevant benchmark index.

As you can see, institutional investors have a fair amount of stake in Raffles Medical Group. This suggests some credibility amongst professional investors. But we can't rely on that fact alone since institutions make bad investments sometimes, just like everyone does. When multiple institutions own a stock, there's always a risk that they are in a 'crowded trade'. When such a trade goes wrong, multiple parties may compete to sell stock fast. This risk is higher in a company without a history of growth. You can see Raffles Medical Group's historic earnings and revenue below, but keep in mind there's always more to the story.

earnings-and-revenue-growth
earnings-and-revenue-growth

Hedge funds don't have many shares in Raffles Medical Group. Our data shows that Raffles Medical Holdings Pte. Ltd. is the largest shareholder with 39% of shares outstanding. For context, the second largest shareholder holds about 12% of the shares outstanding, followed by an ownership of 9.1% by the third-largest shareholder. Choon Yong Loo, who is the second-largest shareholder, also happens to hold the title of Chief Executive Officer.

To make our study more interesting, we found that the top 2 shareholders have a majority ownership in the company, meaning that they are powerful enough to influence the decisions of the company.

Researching institutional ownership is a good way to gauge and filter a stock's expected performance. The same can be achieved by studying analyst sentiments. Quite a few analysts cover the stock, so you could look into forecast growth quite easily.

Insider Ownership Of Raffles Medical Group

The definition of company insiders can be subjective and does vary between jurisdictions. Our data reflects individual insiders, capturing board members at the very least. Company management run the business, but the CEO will answer to the board, even if he or she is a member of it.

Insider ownership is positive when it signals leadership are thinking like the true owners of the company. However, high insider ownership can also give immense power to a small group within the company. This can be negative in some circumstances.

Our information suggests that insiders maintain a significant holding in Raffles Medical Group Ltd. It is very interesting to see that insiders have a meaningful S$265m stake in this S$1.9b business. Most would say this shows a good degree of alignment with shareholders, especially in a company of this size. You can click here to see if those insiders have been buying or selling.

General Public Ownership

The general public-- including retail investors -- own 28% stake in the company, and hence can't easily be ignored. While this group can't necessarily call the shots, it can certainly have a real influence on how the company is run.

Private Company Ownership

Our data indicates that Private Companies hold 42%, of the company's shares. It's hard to draw any conclusions from this fact alone, so its worth looking into who owns those private companies. Sometimes insiders or other related parties have an interest in shares in a public company through a separate private company.

Next Steps:

While it is well worth considering the different groups that own a company, there are other factors that are even more important.

Many find it useful to take an in depth look at how a company has performed in the past. You can access this detailed graph of past earnings, revenue and cash flow.

But ultimately it is the future, not the past, that will determine how well the owners of this business will do. Therefore we think it advisable to take a look at this free report showing whether analysts are predicting a brighter future.

NB: Figures in this article are calculated using data from the last twelve months, which refer to the 12-month period ending on the last date of the month the financial statement is dated. This may not be consistent with full year annual report figures.

Have feedback on this article? Concerned about the content? Get in touch with us directly. Alternatively, email editorial-team (at) simplywallst.com.

This article by Simply Wall St is general in nature. We provide commentary based on historical data and analyst forecasts only using an unbiased methodology and our articles are not intended to be financial advice. It does not constitute a recommendation to buy or sell any stock, and does not take account of your objectives, or your financial situation. We aim to bring you long-term focused analysis driven by fundamental data. Note that our analysis may not factor in the latest price-sensitive company announcements or qualitative material. Simply Wall St has no position in any stocks mentioned.