Advertisement
Singapore markets close in 3 minutes
  • Straits Times Index

    3,407.61
    +39.71 (+1.18%)
     
  • Nikkei

    40,580.76
    +506.07 (+1.26%)
     
  • Hang Seng

    17,978.57
    +209.43 (+1.18%)
     
  • FTSE 100

    8,157.85
    +36.65 (+0.45%)
     
  • Bitcoin USD

    60,580.95
    -2,021.21 (-3.23%)
     
  • CMC Crypto 200

    1,307.81
    -27.10 (-2.03%)
     
  • S&P 500

    5,509.01
    +33.92 (+0.62%)
     
  • Dow

    39,331.85
    +162.33 (+0.41%)
     
  • Nasdaq

    18,028.76
    +149.46 (+0.84%)
     
  • Gold

    2,353.90
    +20.50 (+0.88%)
     
  • Crude Oil

    83.03
    +0.22 (+0.27%)
     
  • 10-Yr Bond

    4.4360
    -0.0430 (-0.96%)
     
  • FTSE Bursa Malaysia

    1,613.12
    +15.16 (+0.95%)
     
  • Jakarta Composite Index

    7,175.59
    +50.45 (+0.71%)
     
  • PSE Index

    6,450.03
    +91.07 (+1.43%)
     

Public companies who have a significant stake must be disappointed along with institutions after iQIYI, Inc.'s (NASDAQ:IQ) market cap dropped by US$182m

Key Insights

  • The considerable ownership by public companies in iQIYI indicates that they collectively have a greater say in management and business strategy

  • A total of 2 investors have a majority stake in the company with 51% ownership

  • Institutions own 32% of iQIYI

A look at the shareholders of iQIYI, Inc. (NASDAQ:IQ) can tell us which group is most powerful. And the group that holds the biggest piece of the pie are public companies with 46% ownership. In other words, the group stands to gain the most (or lose the most) from their investment into the company.

Following a 3.9% decrease in the stock price last week, public companies suffered the most losses, but institutions who own 32% stock also took a hit.

ADVERTISEMENT

Let's delve deeper into each type of owner of iQIYI, beginning with the chart below.

See our latest analysis for iQIYI

ownership-breakdown
ownership-breakdown

What Does The Institutional Ownership Tell Us About iQIYI?

Many institutions measure their performance against an index that approximates the local market. So they usually pay more attention to companies that are included in major indices.

We can see that iQIYI does have institutional investors; and they hold a good portion of the company's stock. This can indicate that the company has a certain degree of credibility in the investment community. However, it is best to be wary of relying on the supposed validation that comes with institutional investors. They too, get it wrong sometimes. When multiple institutions own a stock, there's always a risk that they are in a 'crowded trade'. When such a trade goes wrong, multiple parties may compete to sell stock fast. This risk is higher in a company without a history of growth. You can see iQIYI's historic earnings and revenue below, but keep in mind there's always more to the story.

earnings-and-revenue-growth
earnings-and-revenue-growth

We note that hedge funds don't have a meaningful investment in iQIYI. Our data shows that Baidu, Inc. is the largest shareholder with 46% of shares outstanding. For context, the second largest shareholder holds about 5.1% of the shares outstanding, followed by an ownership of 2.9% by the third-largest shareholder.

After doing some more digging, we found that the top 2 shareholders collectively control more than half of the company's shares, implying that they have considerable power to influence the company's decisions.

Researching institutional ownership is a good way to gauge and filter a stock's expected performance. The same can be achieved by studying analyst sentiments. There are a reasonable number of analysts covering the stock, so it might be useful to find out their aggregate view on the future.

Insider Ownership Of iQIYI

While the precise definition of an insider can be subjective, almost everyone considers board members to be insiders. The company management answer to the board and the latter should represent the interests of shareholders. Notably, sometimes top-level managers are on the board themselves.

I generally consider insider ownership to be a good thing. However, on some occasions it makes it more difficult for other shareholders to hold the board accountable for decisions.

Our most recent data indicates that insiders own less than 1% of iQIYI, Inc.. It's a big company, so even a small proportional interest can create alignment between the board and shareholders. In this case insiders own US$4.3m worth of shares. It is good to see board members owning shares, but it might be worth checking if those insiders have been buying.

General Public Ownership

The general public-- including retail investors -- own 17% stake in the company, and hence can't easily be ignored. While this size of ownership may not be enough to sway a policy decision in their favour, they can still make a collective impact on company policies.

Private Equity Ownership

With an ownership of 5.1%, private equity firms are in a position to play a role in shaping corporate strategy with a focus on value creation. Some might like this, because private equity are sometimes activists who hold management accountable. But other times, private equity is selling out, having taking the company public.

Public Company Ownership

We can see that public companies hold 46% of the iQIYI shares on issue. We can't be certain but it is quite possible this is a strategic stake. The businesses may be similar, or work together.

Next Steps:

While it is well worth considering the different groups that own a company, there are other factors that are even more important. For instance, we've identified 3 warning signs for iQIYI that you should be aware of.

But ultimately it is the future, not the past, that will determine how well the owners of this business will do. Therefore we think it advisable to take a look at this free report showing whether analysts are predicting a brighter future.

NB: Figures in this article are calculated using data from the last twelve months, which refer to the 12-month period ending on the last date of the month the financial statement is dated. This may not be consistent with full year annual report figures.

Have feedback on this article? Concerned about the content? Get in touch with us directly. Alternatively, email editorial-team (at) simplywallst.com.

This article by Simply Wall St is general in nature. We provide commentary based on historical data and analyst forecasts only using an unbiased methodology and our articles are not intended to be financial advice. It does not constitute a recommendation to buy or sell any stock, and does not take account of your objectives, or your financial situation. We aim to bring you long-term focused analysis driven by fundamental data. Note that our analysis may not factor in the latest price-sensitive company announcements or qualitative material. Simply Wall St has no position in any stocks mentioned.