Advertisement
Singapore markets close in 6 hours 10 minutes
  • Straits Times Index

    3,446.15
    +4.38 (+0.13%)
     
  • Nikkei

    38,369.54
    -156.41 (-0.41%)
     
  • Hang Seng

    17,285.87
    +282.96 (+1.66%)
     
  • FTSE 100

    8,274.41
    -17.94 (-0.22%)
     
  • Bitcoin USD

    66,102.14
    -191.82 (-0.29%)
     
  • CMC Crypto 200

    1,353.16
    -17.32 (-1.26%)
     
  • S&P 500

    5,436.44
    -27.10 (-0.50%)
     
  • Dow

    40,743.33
    +203.40 (+0.50%)
     
  • Nasdaq

    17,147.42
    -222.79 (-1.28%)
     
  • Gold

    2,449.60
    -2.30 (-0.09%)
     
  • Crude Oil

    75.64
    +0.91 (+1.22%)
     
  • 10-Yr Bond

    4.1430
    -0.0350 (-0.84%)
     
  • FTSE Bursa Malaysia

    1,614.69
    +2.75 (+0.17%)
     
  • Jakarta Composite Index

    7,261.53
    +19.67 (+0.27%)
     
  • PSE Index

    6,631.17
    +24.81 (+0.38%)
     

Private equity firms account for 48% of Lexicon Pharmaceuticals, Inc.'s (NASDAQ:LXRX) ownership, while individual investors account for 33%

Key Insights

  • Significant control over Lexicon Pharmaceuticals by private equity firms implies that the general public has more power to influence management and governance-related decisions

  • The top 2 shareholders own 52% of the company

  • Institutions own 18% of Lexicon Pharmaceuticals

If you want to know who really controls Lexicon Pharmaceuticals, Inc. (NASDAQ:LXRX), then you'll have to look at the makeup of its share registry. We can see that private equity firms own the lion's share in the company with 48% ownership. In other words, the group stands to gain the most (or lose the most) from their investment into the company.

And individual investors on the other hand have a 33% ownership in the company.

Let's delve deeper into each type of owner of Lexicon Pharmaceuticals, beginning with the chart below.

See our latest analysis for Lexicon Pharmaceuticals

ownership-breakdown
ownership-breakdown

What Does The Institutional Ownership Tell Us About Lexicon Pharmaceuticals?

Institutional investors commonly compare their own returns to the returns of a commonly followed index. So they generally do consider buying larger companies that are included in the relevant benchmark index.

Lexicon Pharmaceuticals already has institutions on the share registry. Indeed, they own a respectable stake in the company. This can indicate that the company has a certain degree of credibility in the investment community. However, it is best to be wary of relying on the supposed validation that comes with institutional investors. They too, get it wrong sometimes. If multiple institutions change their view on a stock at the same time, you could see the share price drop fast. It's therefore worth looking at Lexicon Pharmaceuticals' earnings history below. Of course, the future is what really matters.

earnings-and-revenue-growth
earnings-and-revenue-growth

Lexicon Pharmaceuticals is not owned by hedge funds. The company's largest shareholder is Artal Group S.A., with ownership of 48%. FMR LLC is the second largest shareholder owning 3.8% of common stock, and BlackRock, Inc. holds about 2.1% of the company stock.

A more detailed study of the shareholder registry showed us that 2 of the top shareholders have a considerable amount of ownership in the company, via their 52% stake.

Researching institutional ownership is a good way to gauge and filter a stock's expected performance. The same can be achieved by studying analyst sentiments. Quite a few analysts cover the stock, so you could look into forecast growth quite easily.

Insider Ownership Of Lexicon Pharmaceuticals

The definition of company insiders can be subjective and does vary between jurisdictions. Our data reflects individual insiders, capturing board members at the very least. Company management run the business, but the CEO will answer to the board, even if he or she is a member of it.

Insider ownership is positive when it signals leadership are thinking like the true owners of the company. However, high insider ownership can also give immense power to a small group within the company. This can be negative in some circumstances.

Shareholders would probably be interested to learn that insiders own shares in Lexicon Pharmaceuticals, Inc.. It has a market capitalization of just US$578m, and insiders have US$6.8m worth of shares, in their own names. Some would say this shows alignment of interests between shareholders and the board. But it might be worth checking if those insiders have been selling.

General Public Ownership

The general public-- including retail investors -- own 33% stake in the company, and hence can't easily be ignored. This size of ownership, while considerable, may not be enough to change company policy if the decision is not in sync with other large shareholders.

Private Equity Ownership

Private equity firms hold a 48% stake in Lexicon Pharmaceuticals. This suggests they can be influential in key policy decisions. Sometimes we see private equity stick around for the long term, but generally speaking they have a shorter investment horizon and -- as the name suggests -- don't invest in public companies much. After some time they may look to sell and redeploy capital elsewhere.

Next Steps:

I find it very interesting to look at who exactly owns a company. But to truly gain insight, we need to consider other information, too. To that end, you should be aware of the 3 warning signs we've spotted with Lexicon Pharmaceuticals .

Ultimately the future is most important. You can access this free report on analyst forecasts for the company.

NB: Figures in this article are calculated using data from the last twelve months, which refer to the 12-month period ending on the last date of the month the financial statement is dated. This may not be consistent with full year annual report figures.

Have feedback on this article? Concerned about the content? Get in touch with us directly. Alternatively, email editorial-team (at) simplywallst.com.

This article by Simply Wall St is general in nature. We provide commentary based on historical data and analyst forecasts only using an unbiased methodology and our articles are not intended to be financial advice. It does not constitute a recommendation to buy or sell any stock, and does not take account of your objectives, or your financial situation. We aim to bring you long-term focused analysis driven by fundamental data. Note that our analysis may not factor in the latest price-sensitive company announcements or qualitative material. Simply Wall St has no position in any stocks mentioned.

Have feedback on this article? Concerned about the content? Get in touch with us directly. Alternatively, email editorial-team@simplywallst.com