Advertisement
Singapore markets close in 2 hours
  • Straits Times Index

    3,341.94
    +11.13 (+0.33%)
     
  • Nikkei

    38,683.93
    -19.58 (-0.05%)
     
  • Hang Seng

    18,337.15
    -139.65 (-0.76%)
     
  • FTSE 100

    8,285.34
    +38.39 (+0.47%)
     
  • Bitcoin USD

    71,249.51
    +352.03 (+0.50%)
     
  • CMC Crypto 200

    1,483.98
    +5.28 (+0.36%)
     
  • S&P 500

    5,352.96
    -1.07 (-0.02%)
     
  • Dow

    38,886.17
    +78.84 (+0.20%)
     
  • Nasdaq

    17,173.12
    -14.78 (-0.09%)
     
  • Gold

    2,393.30
    +2.40 (+0.10%)
     
  • Crude Oil

    75.64
    +0.09 (+0.12%)
     
  • 10-Yr Bond

    4.2810
    -0.0080 (-0.19%)
     
  • FTSE Bursa Malaysia

    1,617.13
    +2.40 (+0.15%)
     
  • Jakarta Composite Index

    6,935.26
    -39.64 (-0.57%)
     
  • PSE Index

    6,531.45
    +21.59 (+0.33%)
     

private companies who own 41% along with institutions invested in InPost S.A. (AMS:INPST) saw increase in their holdings value last week

Key Insights

  • Significant control over InPost by private companies implies that the general public has more power to influence management and governance-related decisions

  • 56% of the business is held by the top 3 shareholders

  • Institutional ownership in InPost is 20%

If you want to know who really controls InPost S.A. (AMS:INPST), then you'll have to look at the makeup of its share registry. The group holding the most number of shares in the company, around 41% to be precise, is private companies. Put another way, the group faces the maximum upside potential (or downside risk).

While private companies were the group that benefitted the most from last week’s €245m market cap gain, institutions too had a 20% share in those profits.

ADVERTISEMENT

In the chart below, we zoom in on the different ownership groups of InPost.

Check out our latest analysis for InPost

ownership-breakdown
ownership-breakdown

What Does The Institutional Ownership Tell Us About InPost?

Institutions typically measure themselves against a benchmark when reporting to their own investors, so they often become more enthusiastic about a stock once it's included in a major index. We would expect most companies to have some institutions on the register, especially if they are growing.

As you can see, institutional investors have a fair amount of stake in InPost. This suggests some credibility amongst professional investors. But we can't rely on that fact alone since institutions make bad investments sometimes, just like everyone does. If multiple institutions change their view on a stock at the same time, you could see the share price drop fast. It's therefore worth looking at InPost's earnings history below. Of course, the future is what really matters.

earnings-and-revenue-growth
earnings-and-revenue-growth

InPost is not owned by hedge funds. Looking at our data, we can see that the largest shareholder is Ppf Holdings B.V. with 29% of shares outstanding. In comparison, the second and third largest shareholders hold about 15% and 12% of the stock.

To make our study more interesting, we found that the top 3 shareholders have a majority ownership in the company, meaning that they are powerful enough to influence the decisions of the company.

While it makes sense to study institutional ownership data for a company, it also makes sense to study analyst sentiments to know which way the wind is blowing. There are plenty of analysts covering the stock, so it might be worth seeing what they are forecasting, too.

Insider Ownership Of InPost

The definition of an insider can differ slightly between different countries, but members of the board of directors always count. The company management answer to the board and the latter should represent the interests of shareholders. Notably, sometimes top-level managers are on the board themselves.

Most consider insider ownership a positive because it can indicate the board is well aligned with other shareholders. However, on some occasions too much power is concentrated within this group.

Our data suggests that insiders own under 1% of InPost S.A. in their own names. However, it's possible that insiders might have an indirect interest through a more complex structure. Being so large, we would not expect insiders to own a large proportion of the stock. Collectively, they own €63m of stock. It is good to see board members owning shares, but it might be worth checking if those insiders have been buying.

General Public Ownership

The general public-- including retail investors -- own 18% stake in the company, and hence can't easily be ignored. While this size of ownership may not be enough to sway a policy decision in their favour, they can still make a collective impact on company policies.

Private Equity Ownership

With an ownership of 15%, private equity firms are in a position to play a role in shaping corporate strategy with a focus on value creation. Some investors might be encouraged by this, since private equity are sometimes able to encourage strategies that help the market see the value in the company. Alternatively, those holders might be exiting the investment after taking it public.

Private Company Ownership

We can see that Private Companies own 41%, of the shares on issue. Private companies may be related parties. Sometimes insiders have an interest in a public company through a holding in a private company, rather than in their own capacity as an individual. While it's hard to draw any broad stroke conclusions, it is worth noting as an area for further research.

Next Steps:

I find it very interesting to look at who exactly owns a company. But to truly gain insight, we need to consider other information, too. For instance, we've identified 1 warning sign for InPost that you should be aware of.

If you are like me, you may want to think about whether this company will grow or shrink. Luckily, you can check this free report showing analyst forecasts for its future.

NB: Figures in this article are calculated using data from the last twelve months, which refer to the 12-month period ending on the last date of the month the financial statement is dated. This may not be consistent with full year annual report figures.

Have feedback on this article? Concerned about the content? Get in touch with us directly. Alternatively, email editorial-team (at) simplywallst.com.

This article by Simply Wall St is general in nature. We provide commentary based on historical data and analyst forecasts only using an unbiased methodology and our articles are not intended to be financial advice. It does not constitute a recommendation to buy or sell any stock, and does not take account of your objectives, or your financial situation. We aim to bring you long-term focused analysis driven by fundamental data. Note that our analysis may not factor in the latest price-sensitive company announcements or qualitative material. Simply Wall St has no position in any stocks mentioned.