Advertisement
Singapore markets close in 26 minutes
  • Straits Times Index

    3,325.44
    -0.84 (-0.03%)
     
  • Nikkei

    39,667.07
    +493.92 (+1.26%)
     
  • Hang Seng

    18,089.93
    +17.03 (+0.09%)
     
  • FTSE 100

    8,293.42
    +45.63 (+0.55%)
     
  • Bitcoin USD

    61,500.51
    +838.25 (+1.38%)
     
  • CMC Crypto 200

    1,276.55
    -7.23 (-0.56%)
     
  • S&P 500

    5,469.30
    +21.43 (+0.39%)
     
  • Dow

    39,112.16
    -299.05 (-0.76%)
     
  • Nasdaq

    17,717.65
    +220.84 (+1.26%)
     
  • Gold

    2,327.10
    -3.70 (-0.16%)
     
  • Crude Oil

    81.13
    +0.30 (+0.37%)
     
  • 10-Yr Bond

    4.2380
    -0.0100 (-0.24%)
     
  • FTSE Bursa Malaysia

    1,588.35
    +2.97 (+0.19%)
     
  • Jakarta Composite Index

    6,901.77
    +19.06 (+0.28%)
     
  • PSE Index

    6,313.11
    +14.06 (+0.22%)
     

Pitney Bowes Inc.'s (NYSE:PBI) institutional investors lost 7.3% last week but have benefitted from longer-term gains

Key Insights

  • Given the large stake in the stock by institutions, Pitney Bowes' stock price might be vulnerable to their trading decisions

  • A total of 14 investors have a majority stake in the company with 51% ownership

  • Past performance of a company along with ownership data serve to give a strong idea about prospects for a business

Every investor in Pitney Bowes Inc. (NYSE:PBI) should be aware of the most powerful shareholder groups. With 56% stake, institutions possess the maximum shares in the company. That is, the group stands to benefit the most if the stock rises (or lose the most if there is a downturn).

Institutional investors was the group most impacted after the company's market cap fell to US$891m last week. Still, the 40% one-year gains may have helped mitigate their overall losses. But they would probably be wary of future losses.

ADVERTISEMENT

Let's take a closer look to see what the different types of shareholders can tell us about Pitney Bowes.

View our latest analysis for Pitney Bowes

ownership-breakdown
ownership-breakdown

What Does The Institutional Ownership Tell Us About Pitney Bowes?

Many institutions measure their performance against an index that approximates the local market. So they usually pay more attention to companies that are included in major indices.

We can see that Pitney Bowes does have institutional investors; and they hold a good portion of the company's stock. This can indicate that the company has a certain degree of credibility in the investment community. However, it is best to be wary of relying on the supposed validation that comes with institutional investors. They too, get it wrong sometimes. If multiple institutions change their view on a stock at the same time, you could see the share price drop fast. It's therefore worth looking at Pitney Bowes' earnings history below. Of course, the future is what really matters.

earnings-and-revenue-growth
earnings-and-revenue-growth

Institutional investors own over 50% of the company, so together than can probably strongly influence board decisions. It would appear that 8.8% of Pitney Bowes shares are controlled by hedge funds. That's interesting, because hedge funds can be quite active and activist. Many look for medium term catalysts that will drive the share price higher. The company's largest shareholder is The Vanguard Group, Inc., with ownership of 10%. With 9.5% and 8.8% of the shares outstanding respectively, BlackRock, Inc. and Hestia Capital Management LLC are the second and third largest shareholders.

A closer look at our ownership figures suggests that the top 14 shareholders have a combined ownership of 51% implying that no single shareholder has a majority.

Researching institutional ownership is a good way to gauge and filter a stock's expected performance. The same can be achieved by studying analyst sentiments. While there is some analyst coverage, the company is probably not widely covered. So it could gain more attention, down the track.

Insider Ownership Of Pitney Bowes

The definition of company insiders can be subjective and does vary between jurisdictions. Our data reflects individual insiders, capturing board members at the very least. Company management run the business, but the CEO will answer to the board, even if he or she is a member of it.

I generally consider insider ownership to be a good thing. However, on some occasions it makes it more difficult for other shareholders to hold the board accountable for decisions.

We can report that insiders do own shares in Pitney Bowes Inc.. In their own names, insiders own US$36m worth of stock in the US$891m company. Some would say this shows alignment of interests between shareholders and the board. But it might be worth checking if those insiders have been selling.

General Public Ownership

With a 31% ownership, the general public, mostly comprising of individual investors, have some degree of sway over Pitney Bowes. While this group can't necessarily call the shots, it can certainly have a real influence on how the company is run.

Next Steps:

I find it very interesting to look at who exactly owns a company. But to truly gain insight, we need to consider other information, too. Consider for instance, the ever-present spectre of investment risk. We've identified 2 warning signs with Pitney Bowes , and understanding them should be part of your investment process.

But ultimately it is the future, not the past, that will determine how well the owners of this business will do. Therefore we think it advisable to take a look at this free report showing whether analysts are predicting a brighter future.

NB: Figures in this article are calculated using data from the last twelve months, which refer to the 12-month period ending on the last date of the month the financial statement is dated. This may not be consistent with full year annual report figures.

Have feedback on this article? Concerned about the content? Get in touch with us directly. Alternatively, email editorial-team (at) simplywallst.com.

This article by Simply Wall St is general in nature. We provide commentary based on historical data and analyst forecasts only using an unbiased methodology and our articles are not intended to be financial advice. It does not constitute a recommendation to buy or sell any stock, and does not take account of your objectives, or your financial situation. We aim to bring you long-term focused analysis driven by fundamental data. Note that our analysis may not factor in the latest price-sensitive company announcements or qualitative material. Simply Wall St has no position in any stocks mentioned.

Have feedback on this article? Concerned about the content? Get in touch with us directly. Alternatively, email editorial-team@simplywallst.com