Advertisement
Singapore markets closed
  • Straits Times Index

    3,415.51
    +47.61 (+1.41%)
     
  • S&P 500

    5,513.99
    +4.98 (+0.09%)
     
  • Dow

    39,321.81
    -10.04 (-0.03%)
     
  • Nasdaq

    18,039.96
    +11.19 (+0.06%)
     
  • Bitcoin USD

    60,338.88
    -1,869.31 (-3.00%)
     
  • CMC Crypto 200

    1,300.98
    -33.94 (-2.54%)
     
  • FTSE 100

    8,168.03
    +46.83 (+0.58%)
     
  • Gold

    2,371.70
    +38.30 (+1.64%)
     
  • Crude Oil

    83.25
    +0.44 (+0.53%)
     
  • 10-Yr Bond

    4.3490
    -0.0870 (-1.96%)
     
  • Nikkei

    40,580.76
    +506.07 (+1.26%)
     
  • Hang Seng

    17,978.57
    +209.43 (+1.18%)
     
  • FTSE Bursa Malaysia

    1,615.32
    +17.36 (+1.09%)
     
  • Jakarta Composite Index

    7,196.75
    +71.61 (+1.01%)
     
  • PSE Index

    6,450.03
    +91.07 (+1.43%)
     

NZME Limited (NZSE:NZM) is definitely on the radar of institutional investors who own 43% of the company

Key Insights

  • Institutions' substantial holdings in NZME implies that they have significant influence over the company's share price

  • 51% of the business is held by the top 5 shareholders

  • Using data from analyst forecasts alongside ownership research, one can better assess the future performance of a company

To get a sense of who is truly in control of NZME Limited (NZSE:NZM), it is important to understand the ownership structure of the business. And the group that holds the biggest piece of the pie are institutions with 43% ownership. Put another way, the group faces the maximum upside potential (or downside risk).

Since institutional have access to huge amounts of capital, their market moves tend to receive a lot of scrutiny by retail or individual investors. Hence, having a considerable amount of institutional money invested in a company is often regarded as a desirable trait.

ADVERTISEMENT

Let's delve deeper into each type of owner of NZME, beginning with the chart below.

Check out our latest analysis for NZME

ownership-breakdown
ownership-breakdown

What Does The Institutional Ownership Tell Us About NZME?

Institutions typically measure themselves against a benchmark when reporting to their own investors, so they often become more enthusiastic about a stock once it's included in a major index. We would expect most companies to have some institutions on the register, especially if they are growing.

NZME already has institutions on the share registry. Indeed, they own a respectable stake in the company. This suggests some credibility amongst professional investors. But we can't rely on that fact alone since institutions make bad investments sometimes, just like everyone does. It is not uncommon to see a big share price drop if two large institutional investors try to sell out of a stock at the same time. So it is worth checking the past earnings trajectory of NZME, (below). Of course, keep in mind that there are other factors to consider, too.

earnings-and-revenue-growth
earnings-and-revenue-growth

It looks like hedge funds own 18% of NZME shares. That's interesting, because hedge funds can be quite active and activist. Many look for medium term catalysts that will drive the share price higher. Looking at our data, we can see that the largest shareholder is Spheria Asset Management Pty Ltd with 19% of shares outstanding. For context, the second largest shareholder holds about 10% of the shares outstanding, followed by an ownership of 9.8% by the third-largest shareholder. Furthermore, CEO Michael Boggs is the owner of 1.3% of the company's shares.

Our research also brought to light the fact that roughly 51% of the company is controlled by the top 5 shareholders suggesting that these owners wield significant influence on the business.

While studying institutional ownership for a company can add value to your research, it is also a good practice to research analyst recommendations to get a deeper understand of a stock's expected performance. There are a reasonable number of analysts covering the stock, so it might be useful to find out their aggregate view on the future.

Insider Ownership Of NZME

The definition of company insiders can be subjective and does vary between jurisdictions. Our data reflects individual insiders, capturing board members at the very least. Management ultimately answers to the board. However, it is not uncommon for managers to be executive board members, especially if they are a founder or the CEO.

Most consider insider ownership a positive because it can indicate the board is well aligned with other shareholders. However, on some occasions too much power is concentrated within this group.

Our most recent data indicates that insiders own some shares in NZME Limited. In their own names, insiders own NZ$4.2m worth of stock in the NZ$162m company. It is good to see some investment by insiders, but we usually like to see higher insider holdings. It might be worth checking if those insiders have been buying.

General Public Ownership

With a 34% ownership, the general public, mostly comprising of individual investors, have some degree of sway over NZME. While this size of ownership may not be enough to sway a policy decision in their favour, they can still make a collective impact on company policies.

Next Steps:

It's always worth thinking about the different groups who own shares in a company. But to understand NZME better, we need to consider many other factors. To that end, you should be aware of the 2 warning signs we've spotted with NZME .

If you are like me, you may want to think about whether this company will grow or shrink. Luckily, you can check this free report showing analyst forecasts for its future.

NB: Figures in this article are calculated using data from the last twelve months, which refer to the 12-month period ending on the last date of the month the financial statement is dated. This may not be consistent with full year annual report figures.

Have feedback on this article? Concerned about the content? Get in touch with us directly. Alternatively, email editorial-team (at) simplywallst.com.

This article by Simply Wall St is general in nature. We provide commentary based on historical data and analyst forecasts only using an unbiased methodology and our articles are not intended to be financial advice. It does not constitute a recommendation to buy or sell any stock, and does not take account of your objectives, or your financial situation. We aim to bring you long-term focused analysis driven by fundamental data. Note that our analysis may not factor in the latest price-sensitive company announcements or qualitative material. Simply Wall St has no position in any stocks mentioned.