Advertisement
Singapore markets closed
  • Straits Times Index

    3,332.80
    -10.55 (-0.32%)
     
  • Nikkei

    39,583.08
    +241.54 (+0.61%)
     
  • Hang Seng

    17,718.61
    +2.14 (+0.01%)
     
  • FTSE 100

    8,164.12
    -15.56 (-0.19%)
     
  • Bitcoin USD

    60,757.49
    +137.68 (+0.23%)
     
  • CMC Crypto 200

    1,261.90
    -21.93 (-1.71%)
     
  • S&P 500

    5,460.48
    -22.39 (-0.41%)
     
  • Dow

    39,118.86
    -45.20 (-0.12%)
     
  • Nasdaq

    17,732.60
    -126.08 (-0.71%)
     
  • Gold

    2,336.90
    +0.30 (+0.01%)
     
  • Crude Oil

    81.46
    -0.28 (-0.34%)
     
  • 10-Yr Bond

    4.3430
    +0.0550 (+1.28%)
     
  • FTSE Bursa Malaysia

    1,590.09
    +5.15 (+0.32%)
     
  • Jakarta Composite Index

    7,063.58
    +95.63 (+1.37%)
     
  • PSE Index

    6,411.91
    +21.33 (+0.33%)
     

Institutional investors in CAVA Group, Inc. (NYSE:CAVA) lost 3.8% last week but have reaped the benefits of longer-term growth

Key Insights

  • Given the large stake in the stock by institutions, CAVA Group's stock price might be vulnerable to their trading decisions

  • A total of 7 investors have a majority stake in the company with 51% ownership

  • Insiders have sold recently

If you want to know who really controls CAVA Group, Inc. (NYSE:CAVA), then you'll have to look at the makeup of its share registry. We can see that institutions own the lion's share in the company with 53% ownership. In other words, the group stands to gain the most (or lose the most) from their investment into the company.

No shareholder likes losing money on their investments, especially institutional investors who saw their holdings drop 3.8% in value last week. However, the 117% one-year return to shareholders might have softened the blow. But they would probably be wary of future losses.

ADVERTISEMENT

In the chart below, we zoom in on the different ownership groups of CAVA Group.

See our latest analysis for CAVA Group

ownership-breakdown
ownership-breakdown

What Does The Institutional Ownership Tell Us About CAVA Group?

Institutions typically measure themselves against a benchmark when reporting to their own investors, so they often become more enthusiastic about a stock once it's included in a major index. We would expect most companies to have some institutions on the register, especially if they are growing.

We can see that CAVA Group does have institutional investors; and they hold a good portion of the company's stock. This suggests some credibility amongst professional investors. But we can't rely on that fact alone since institutions make bad investments sometimes, just like everyone does. If multiple institutions change their view on a stock at the same time, you could see the share price drop fast. It's therefore worth looking at CAVA Group's earnings history below. Of course, the future is what really matters.

earnings-and-revenue-growth
earnings-and-revenue-growth

Since institutional investors own more than half the issued stock, the board will likely have to pay attention to their preferences. Hedge funds don't have many shares in CAVA Group. Artal Group S.A. is currently the largest shareholder, with 21% of shares outstanding. With 7.6% and 6.3% of the shares outstanding respectively, Capital Research and Management Company and T. Rowe Price Group, Inc. are the second and third largest shareholders. In addition, we found that Brett Schulman, the CEO has 1.1% of the shares allocated to their name.

We also observed that the top 7 shareholders account for more than half of the share register, with a few smaller shareholders to balance the interests of the larger ones to a certain extent.

While it makes sense to study institutional ownership data for a company, it also makes sense to study analyst sentiments to know which way the wind is blowing. There are a reasonable number of analysts covering the stock, so it might be useful to find out their aggregate view on the future.

Insider Ownership Of CAVA Group

While the precise definition of an insider can be subjective, almost everyone considers board members to be insiders. Management ultimately answers to the board. However, it is not uncommon for managers to be executive board members, especially if they are a founder or the CEO.

Insider ownership is positive when it signals leadership are thinking like the true owners of the company. However, high insider ownership can also give immense power to a small group within the company. This can be negative in some circumstances.

We can report that insiders do own shares in CAVA Group, Inc.. It is a very large company, and board members collectively own US$214m worth of shares (at current prices). we sometimes take an interest in whether they have been buying or selling.

General Public Ownership

With a 18% ownership, the general public, mostly comprising of individual investors, have some degree of sway over CAVA Group. While this group can't necessarily call the shots, it can certainly have a real influence on how the company is run.

Private Equity Ownership

Private equity firms hold a 27% stake in CAVA Group. This suggests they can be influential in key policy decisions. Sometimes we see private equity stick around for the long term, but generally speaking they have a shorter investment horizon and -- as the name suggests -- don't invest in public companies much. After some time they may look to sell and redeploy capital elsewhere.

Next Steps:

I find it very interesting to look at who exactly owns a company. But to truly gain insight, we need to consider other information, too. For instance, we've identified 2 warning signs for CAVA Group (1 is a bit unpleasant) that you should be aware of.

If you are like me, you may want to think about whether this company will grow or shrink. Luckily, you can check this free report showing analyst forecasts for its future.

NB: Figures in this article are calculated using data from the last twelve months, which refer to the 12-month period ending on the last date of the month the financial statement is dated. This may not be consistent with full year annual report figures.

Have feedback on this article? Concerned about the content? Get in touch with us directly. Alternatively, email editorial-team (at) simplywallst.com.

This article by Simply Wall St is general in nature. We provide commentary based on historical data and analyst forecasts only using an unbiased methodology and our articles are not intended to be financial advice. It does not constitute a recommendation to buy or sell any stock, and does not take account of your objectives, or your financial situation. We aim to bring you long-term focused analysis driven by fundamental data. Note that our analysis may not factor in the latest price-sensitive company announcements or qualitative material. Simply Wall St has no position in any stocks mentioned.

Have feedback on this article? Concerned about the content? Get in touch with us directly. Alternatively, email editorial-team@simplywallst.com