Advertisement
Singapore markets open in 3 hours 55 minutes
  • Straits Times Index

    3,410.81
    -29.07 (-0.85%)
     
  • S&P 500

    5,567.19
    +30.17 (+0.54%)
     
  • Dow

    39,375.87
    +67.87 (+0.17%)
     
  • Nasdaq

    18,352.76
    +164.46 (+0.90%)
     
  • Bitcoin USD

    57,233.17
    -935.54 (-1.61%)
     
  • CMC Crypto 200

    1,186.69
    -22.00 (-1.82%)
     
  • FTSE 100

    8,203.93
    -37.33 (-0.45%)
     
  • Gold

    2,399.80
    +2.10 (+0.09%)
     
  • Crude Oil

    83.44
    +0.28 (+0.34%)
     
  • 10-Yr Bond

    4.2720
    -0.0830 (-1.91%)
     
  • Nikkei

    40,912.37
    -1.23 (-0.00%)
     
  • Hang Seng

    17,799.61
    -228.69 (-1.27%)
     
  • FTSE Bursa Malaysia

    1,611.02
    -5.73 (-0.35%)
     
  • Jakarta Composite Index

    7,253.37
    -7,220.89 (-49.89%)
     
  • PSE Index

    6,492.75
    -14.74 (-0.23%)
     

Individual investors own 32% of Seplat Energy Plc (LON:SEPL) shares but private companies control 47% of the company

Key Insights

  • Significant control over Seplat Energy by private companies implies that the general public has more power to influence management and governance-related decisions

  • A total of 4 investors have a majority stake in the company with 51% ownership

  • Using data from analyst forecasts alongside ownership research, one can better assess the future performance of a company

Every investor in Seplat Energy Plc (LON:SEPL) should be aware of the most powerful shareholder groups. We can see that private companies own the lion's share in the company with 47% ownership. That is, the group stands to benefit the most if the stock rises (or lose the most if there is a downturn).

Individual investors, on the other hand, account for 32% of the company's stockholders.

ADVERTISEMENT

In the chart below, we zoom in on the different ownership groups of Seplat Energy.

See our latest analysis for Seplat Energy

ownership-breakdown
ownership-breakdown

What Does The Institutional Ownership Tell Us About Seplat Energy?

Institutions typically measure themselves against a benchmark when reporting to their own investors, so they often become more enthusiastic about a stock once it's included in a major index. We would expect most companies to have some institutions on the register, especially if they are growing.

As you can see, institutional investors have a fair amount of stake in Seplat Energy. This can indicate that the company has a certain degree of credibility in the investment community. However, it is best to be wary of relying on the supposed validation that comes with institutional investors. They too, get it wrong sometimes. When multiple institutions own a stock, there's always a risk that they are in a 'crowded trade'. When such a trade goes wrong, multiple parties may compete to sell stock fast. This risk is higher in a company without a history of growth. You can see Seplat Energy's historic earnings and revenue below, but keep in mind there's always more to the story.

earnings-and-revenue-growth
earnings-and-revenue-growth

Our data indicates that hedge funds own 8.9% of Seplat Energy. That catches my attention because hedge funds sometimes try to influence management, or bring about changes that will create near term value for shareholders. Our data shows that PT Pertamina (Persero) is the largest shareholder with 20% of shares outstanding. Meanwhile, the second and third largest shareholders, hold 14% and 8.9%, of the shares outstanding, respectively. Additionally, the company's CEO Roger Brown directly holds 0.7% of the total shares outstanding.

Our research also brought to light the fact that roughly 51% of the company is controlled by the top 4 shareholders suggesting that these owners wield significant influence on the business.

Researching institutional ownership is a good way to gauge and filter a stock's expected performance. The same can be achieved by studying analyst sentiments. There are a reasonable number of analysts covering the stock, so it might be useful to find out their aggregate view on the future.

Insider Ownership Of Seplat Energy

The definition of an insider can differ slightly between different countries, but members of the board of directors always count. The company management answer to the board and the latter should represent the interests of shareholders. Notably, sometimes top-level managers are on the board themselves.

Most consider insider ownership a positive because it can indicate the board is well aligned with other shareholders. However, on some occasions too much power is concentrated within this group.

We can see that insiders own shares in Seplat Energy Plc. This is a big company, so it is good to see this level of alignment. Insiders own UK£26m worth of shares (at current prices). If you would like to explore the question of insider alignment, you can click here to see if insiders have been buying or selling.

General Public Ownership

The general public-- including retail investors -- own 32% stake in the company, and hence can't easily be ignored. This size of ownership, while considerable, may not be enough to change company policy if the decision is not in sync with other large shareholders.

Private Company Ownership

It seems that Private Companies own 47%, of the Seplat Energy stock. It might be worth looking deeper into this. If related parties, such as insiders, have an interest in one of these private companies, that should be disclosed in the annual report. Private companies may also have a strategic interest in the company.

Next Steps:

It's always worth thinking about the different groups who own shares in a company. But to understand Seplat Energy better, we need to consider many other factors. Consider risks, for instance. Every company has them, and we've spotted 2 warning signs for Seplat Energy you should know about.

Ultimately the future is most important. You can access this free report on analyst forecasts for the company.

NB: Figures in this article are calculated using data from the last twelve months, which refer to the 12-month period ending on the last date of the month the financial statement is dated. This may not be consistent with full year annual report figures.

Have feedback on this article? Concerned about the content? Get in touch with us directly. Alternatively, email editorial-team (at) simplywallst.com.

This article by Simply Wall St is general in nature. We provide commentary based on historical data and analyst forecasts only using an unbiased methodology and our articles are not intended to be financial advice. It does not constitute a recommendation to buy or sell any stock, and does not take account of your objectives, or your financial situation. We aim to bring you long-term focused analysis driven by fundamental data. Note that our analysis may not factor in the latest price-sensitive company announcements or qualitative material. Simply Wall St has no position in any stocks mentioned.