Advertisement
Singapore markets closed
  • Straits Times Index

    3,439.88
    +24.37 (+0.71%)
     
  • S&P 500

    5,537.02
    +28.01 (+0.51%)
     
  • Dow

    39,308.00
    -23.90 (-0.06%)
     
  • Nasdaq

    18,188.30
    +159.54 (+0.88%)
     
  • Bitcoin USD

    56,937.70
    -3,324.52 (-5.52%)
     
  • CMC Crypto 200

    1,197.21
    -63.97 (-5.08%)
     
  • FTSE 100

    8,250.47
    +79.35 (+0.97%)
     
  • Gold

    2,369.40
    0.00 (0.00%)
     
  • Crude Oil

    83.60
    -0.28 (-0.33%)
     
  • 10-Yr Bond

    4.3550
    0.0000 (0.00%)
     
  • Nikkei

    40,913.65
    +332.89 (+0.82%)
     
  • Hang Seng

    18,028.28
    +49.71 (+0.28%)
     
  • FTSE Bursa Malaysia

    1,616.75
    +1.43 (+0.09%)
     
  • Jakarta Composite Index

    7,220.89
    +24.13 (+0.34%)
     
  • PSE Index

    6,507.49
    +57.46 (+0.89%)
     

Hedge funds own 24% of Coelacanth Energy Inc. (CVE:CEI) shares but retail investors control 38% of the company

Key Insights

  • Coelacanth Energy's significant retail investors ownership suggests that the key decisions are influenced by shareholders from the larger public

  • 52% of the business is held by the top 4 shareholders

  • Insiders have been selling lately

Every investor in Coelacanth Energy Inc. (CVE:CEI) should be aware of the most powerful shareholder groups. With 38% stake, retail investors possess the maximum shares in the company. Put another way, the group faces the maximum upside potential (or downside risk).

And hedge funds on the other hand have a 24% ownership in the company.

Let's take a closer look to see what the different types of shareholders can tell us about Coelacanth Energy.

ADVERTISEMENT

Check out our latest analysis for Coelacanth Energy

ownership-breakdown
ownership-breakdown

What Does The Lack Of Institutional Ownership Tell Us About Coelacanth Energy?

Small companies that are not very actively traded often lack institutional investors, but it's less common to see large companies without them.

There could be various reasons why no institutions own shares in a company. Typically, small, newly listed companies don't attract much attention from fund managers, because it would not be possible for large fund managers to build a meaningful position in the company. On the other hand, it's always possible that professional investors are avoiding a company because they don't think it's the best place for their money. Coelacanth Energy might not have the sort of past performance institutions are looking for, or perhaps they simply have not studied the business closely.

earnings-and-revenue-growth
earnings-and-revenue-growth

Our data indicates that hedge funds own 24% of Coelacanth Energy. That catches my attention because hedge funds sometimes try to influence management, or bring about changes that will create near term value for shareholders. The company's largest shareholder is GMT Capital Corp., with ownership of 24%. Meanwhile, the second and third largest shareholders, hold 21% and 3.9%, of the shares outstanding, respectively. Raymond Hyer, who is the third-largest shareholder, also happens to hold the title of Member of the Board of Directors. In addition, we found that Robert Zakresky, the CEO has 3.7% of the shares allocated to their name.

To make our study more interesting, we found that the top 4 shareholders control more than half of the company which implies that this group has considerable sway over the company's decision-making.

While studying institutional ownership for a company can add value to your research, it is also a good practice to research analyst recommendations to get a deeper understand of a stock's expected performance. There is a little analyst coverage of the stock, but not much. So there is room for it to gain more coverage.

Insider Ownership Of Coelacanth Energy

The definition of company insiders can be subjective and does vary between jurisdictions. Our data reflects individual insiders, capturing board members at the very least. Management ultimately answers to the board. However, it is not uncommon for managers to be executive board members, especially if they are a founder or the CEO.

I generally consider insider ownership to be a good thing. However, on some occasions it makes it more difficult for other shareholders to hold the board accountable for decisions.

It seems insiders own a significant proportion of Coelacanth Energy Inc.. Insiders have a CA$54m stake in this CA$397m business. This may suggest that the founders still own a lot of shares. You can click here to see if they have been buying or selling.

General Public Ownership

The general public-- including retail investors -- own 38% stake in the company, and hence can't easily be ignored. While this size of ownership may not be enough to sway a policy decision in their favour, they can still make a collective impact on company policies.

Private Company Ownership

We can see that Private Companies own 3.7%, of the shares on issue. It's hard to draw any conclusions from this fact alone, so its worth looking into who owns those private companies. Sometimes insiders or other related parties have an interest in shares in a public company through a separate private company.

Public Company Ownership

Public companies currently own 21% of Coelacanth Energy stock. It's hard to say for sure but this suggests they have entwined business interests. This might be a strategic stake, so it's worth watching this space for changes in ownership.

Next Steps:

While it is well worth considering the different groups that own a company, there are other factors that are even more important. For example, we've discovered 3 warning signs for Coelacanth Energy (1 doesn't sit too well with us!) that you should be aware of before investing here.

If you are like me, you may want to think about whether this company will grow or shrink. Luckily, you can check this free report showing analyst forecasts for its future.

NB: Figures in this article are calculated using data from the last twelve months, which refer to the 12-month period ending on the last date of the month the financial statement is dated. This may not be consistent with full year annual report figures.

Have feedback on this article? Concerned about the content? Get in touch with us directly. Alternatively, email editorial-team (at) simplywallst.com.

This article by Simply Wall St is general in nature. We provide commentary based on historical data and analyst forecasts only using an unbiased methodology and our articles are not intended to be financial advice. It does not constitute a recommendation to buy or sell any stock, and does not take account of your objectives, or your financial situation. We aim to bring you long-term focused analysis driven by fundamental data. Note that our analysis may not factor in the latest price-sensitive company announcements or qualitative material. Simply Wall St has no position in any stocks mentioned.

Have feedback on this article? Concerned about the content? Get in touch with us directly. Alternatively, email editorial-team@simplywallst.com