Advertisement
Singapore markets closed
  • Straits Times Index

    3,410.81
    -29.07 (-0.85%)
     
  • Nikkei

    40,912.37
    -1.28 (-0.00%)
     
  • Hang Seng

    17,799.61
    -228.67 (-1.27%)
     
  • FTSE 100

    8,203.93
    -37.33 (-0.45%)
     
  • Bitcoin USD

    57,931.32
    +1,455.93 (+2.58%)
     
  • CMC Crypto 200

    1,203.79
    -4.91 (-0.41%)
     
  • S&P 500

    5,567.19
    +30.17 (+0.54%)
     
  • Dow

    39,375.87
    +67.87 (+0.17%)
     
  • Nasdaq

    18,352.76
    +164.46 (+0.90%)
     
  • Gold

    2,399.80
    +30.40 (+1.28%)
     
  • Crude Oil

    83.44
    -0.44 (-0.52%)
     
  • 10-Yr Bond

    4.2720
    -0.0830 (-1.91%)
     
  • FTSE Bursa Malaysia

    1,611.02
    -5.73 (-0.35%)
     
  • Jakarta Composite Index

    7,253.37
    +32.48 (+0.45%)
     
  • PSE Index

    6,492.75
    -14.74 (-0.23%)
     

Fraser & Neave Holdings Bhd's (KLSE:F&N) largest shareholders are private companies with 55% ownership, institutions own 24%

Key Insights

Every investor in Fraser & Neave Holdings Bhd (KLSE:F&N) should be aware of the most powerful shareholder groups. And the group that holds the biggest piece of the pie are private companies with 55% ownership. Put another way, the group faces the maximum upside potential (or downside risk).

And institutions on the other hand have a 24% ownership in the company. Institutions often own shares in more established companies, while it's not unusual to see insiders own a fair bit of smaller companies.

ADVERTISEMENT

Let's take a closer look to see what the different types of shareholders can tell us about Fraser & Neave Holdings Bhd.

View our latest analysis for Fraser & Neave Holdings Bhd

ownership-breakdown
ownership-breakdown

What Does The Institutional Ownership Tell Us About Fraser & Neave Holdings Bhd?

Institutions typically measure themselves against a benchmark when reporting to their own investors, so they often become more enthusiastic about a stock once it's included in a major index. We would expect most companies to have some institutions on the register, especially if they are growing.

Fraser & Neave Holdings Bhd already has institutions on the share registry. Indeed, they own a respectable stake in the company. This suggests some credibility amongst professional investors. But we can't rely on that fact alone since institutions make bad investments sometimes, just like everyone does. It is not uncommon to see a big share price drop if two large institutional investors try to sell out of a stock at the same time. So it is worth checking the past earnings trajectory of Fraser & Neave Holdings Bhd, (below). Of course, keep in mind that there are other factors to consider, too.

earnings-and-revenue-growth
earnings-and-revenue-growth

We note that hedge funds don't have a meaningful investment in Fraser & Neave Holdings Bhd. TCC Assets Limited is currently the largest shareholder, with 55% of shares outstanding. This implies that they have majority interest control of the future of the company. With 11% and 9.5% of the shares outstanding respectively, Employees Provident Fund of Malaysia and Permodalan Nasional Berhad are the second and third largest shareholders.

Researching institutional ownership is a good way to gauge and filter a stock's expected performance. The same can be achieved by studying analyst sentiments. There are a reasonable number of analysts covering the stock, so it might be useful to find out their aggregate view on the future.

Insider Ownership Of Fraser & Neave Holdings Bhd

The definition of an insider can differ slightly between different countries, but members of the board of directors always count. Management ultimately answers to the board. However, it is not uncommon for managers to be executive board members, especially if they are a founder or the CEO.

Insider ownership is positive when it signals leadership are thinking like the true owners of the company. However, high insider ownership can also give immense power to a small group within the company. This can be negative in some circumstances.

Our most recent data indicates that insiders own less than 1% of Fraser & Neave Holdings Bhd. But they may have an indirect interest through a corporate structure that we haven't picked up on. It is a pretty big company, so it would be possible for board members to own a meaningful interest in the company, without owning much of a proportional interest. In this case, they own around RM70m worth of shares (at current prices). It is good to see board members owning shares, but it might be worth checking if those insiders have been buying.

General Public Ownership

With a 10% ownership, the general public, mostly comprising of individual investors, have some degree of sway over Fraser & Neave Holdings Bhd. This size of ownership, while considerable, may not be enough to change company policy if the decision is not in sync with other large shareholders.

Private Company Ownership

We can see that Private Companies own 55%, of the shares on issue. It's hard to draw any conclusions from this fact alone, so its worth looking into who owns those private companies. Sometimes insiders or other related parties have an interest in shares in a public company through a separate private company.

Next Steps:

While it is well worth considering the different groups that own a company, there are other factors that are even more important.

I like to dive deeper into how a company has performed in the past. You can find historic revenue and earnings in this detailed graph.

If you are like me, you may want to think about whether this company will grow or shrink. Luckily, you can check this free report showing analyst forecasts for its future.

NB: Figures in this article are calculated using data from the last twelve months, which refer to the 12-month period ending on the last date of the month the financial statement is dated. This may not be consistent with full year annual report figures.

Have feedback on this article? Concerned about the content? Get in touch with us directly. Alternatively, email editorial-team (at) simplywallst.com.

This article by Simply Wall St is general in nature. We provide commentary based on historical data and analyst forecasts only using an unbiased methodology and our articles are not intended to be financial advice. It does not constitute a recommendation to buy or sell any stock, and does not take account of your objectives, or your financial situation. We aim to bring you long-term focused analysis driven by fundamental data. Note that our analysis may not factor in the latest price-sensitive company announcements or qualitative material. Simply Wall St has no position in any stocks mentioned.