Advertisement
Singapore markets open in 3 hours 31 minutes
  • Straits Times Index

    3,367.90
    +29.33 (+0.88%)
     
  • S&P 500

    5,509.01
    +33.92 (+0.62%)
     
  • Dow

    39,331.85
    +162.33 (+0.41%)
     
  • Nasdaq

    18,028.76
    +149.46 (+0.84%)
     
  • Bitcoin USD

    61,907.43
    -1,175.18 (-1.86%)
     
  • CMC Crypto 200

    1,332.23
    -12.28 (-0.91%)
     
  • FTSE 100

    8,121.20
    -45.56 (-0.56%)
     
  • Gold

    2,338.60
    -0.30 (-0.01%)
     
  • Crude Oil

    83.17
    -0.21 (-0.25%)
     
  • 10-Yr Bond

    4.4360
    -0.0430 (-0.96%)
     
  • Nikkei

    40,074.69
    +443.63 (+1.12%)
     
  • Hang Seng

    17,769.14
    +50.53 (+0.29%)
     
  • FTSE Bursa Malaysia

    1,597.96
    -0.24 (-0.02%)
     
  • Jakarta Composite Index

    7,125.14
    -7,139.63 (-50.05%)
     
  • PSE Index

    6,358.96
    -39.81 (-0.62%)
     

Emerald Resources NL's (ASX:EMR) largest shareholders are retail investors with 39% ownership, institutions own 38%

Key Insights

  • Significant control over Emerald Resources by retail investors implies that the general public has more power to influence management and governance-related decisions

  • A total of 12 investors have a majority stake in the company with 51% ownership

  • Insiders own 18% of Emerald Resources

To get a sense of who is truly in control of Emerald Resources NL (ASX:EMR), it is important to understand the ownership structure of the business. The group holding the most number of shares in the company, around 39% to be precise, is retail investors. That is, the group stands to benefit the most if the stock rises (or lose the most if there is a downturn).

And institutions on the other hand have a 38% ownership in the company. Large companies usually have institutions as shareholders, and we usually see insiders owning shares in smaller companies.

ADVERTISEMENT

In the chart below, we zoom in on the different ownership groups of Emerald Resources.

View our latest analysis for Emerald Resources

ownership-breakdown
ownership-breakdown

What Does The Institutional Ownership Tell Us About Emerald Resources?

Institutional investors commonly compare their own returns to the returns of a commonly followed index. So they generally do consider buying larger companies that are included in the relevant benchmark index.

Emerald Resources already has institutions on the share registry. Indeed, they own a respectable stake in the company. This suggests some credibility amongst professional investors. But we can't rely on that fact alone since institutions make bad investments sometimes, just like everyone does. When multiple institutions own a stock, there's always a risk that they are in a 'crowded trade'. When such a trade goes wrong, multiple parties may compete to sell stock fast. This risk is higher in a company without a history of growth. You can see Emerald Resources' historic earnings and revenue below, but keep in mind there's always more to the story.

earnings-and-revenue-growth
earnings-and-revenue-growth

Hedge funds don't have many shares in Emerald Resources. Our data shows that Van Eck Associates Corporation is the largest shareholder with 9.8% of shares outstanding. Meanwhile, the second and third largest shareholders, hold 6.9% and 6.4%, of the shares outstanding, respectively. Furthermore, CEO Morgan Hart is the owner of 6.0% of the company's shares.

After doing some more digging, we found that the top 12 have the combined ownership of 51% in the company, suggesting that no single shareholder has significant control over the company.

While it makes sense to study institutional ownership data for a company, it also makes sense to study analyst sentiments to know which way the wind is blowing. While there is some analyst coverage, the company is probably not widely covered. So it could gain more attention, down the track.

Insider Ownership Of Emerald Resources

While the precise definition of an insider can be subjective, almost everyone considers board members to be insiders. Company management run the business, but the CEO will answer to the board, even if he or she is a member of it.

Insider ownership is positive when it signals leadership are thinking like the true owners of the company. However, high insider ownership can also give immense power to a small group within the company. This can be negative in some circumstances.

It seems insiders own a significant proportion of Emerald Resources NL. Insiders own AU$427m worth of shares in the AU$2.3b company. That's quite meaningful. Most would be pleased to see the board is investing alongside them. You may wish to access this free chart showing recent trading by insiders.

General Public Ownership

The general public-- including retail investors -- own 39% stake in the company, and hence can't easily be ignored. While this size of ownership may not be enough to sway a policy decision in their favour, they can still make a collective impact on company policies.

Private Company Ownership

We can see that Private Companies own 3.8%, of the shares on issue. Private companies may be related parties. Sometimes insiders have an interest in a public company through a holding in a private company, rather than in their own capacity as an individual. While it's hard to draw any broad stroke conclusions, it is worth noting as an area for further research.

Next Steps:

I find it very interesting to look at who exactly owns a company. But to truly gain insight, we need to consider other information, too. To that end, you should be aware of the 1 warning sign we've spotted with Emerald Resources .

Ultimately the future is most important. You can access this free report on analyst forecasts for the company.

NB: Figures in this article are calculated using data from the last twelve months, which refer to the 12-month period ending on the last date of the month the financial statement is dated. This may not be consistent with full year annual report figures.

Have feedback on this article? Concerned about the content? Get in touch with us directly. Alternatively, email editorial-team (at) simplywallst.com.

This article by Simply Wall St is general in nature. We provide commentary based on historical data and analyst forecasts only using an unbiased methodology and our articles are not intended to be financial advice. It does not constitute a recommendation to buy or sell any stock, and does not take account of your objectives, or your financial situation. We aim to bring you long-term focused analysis driven by fundamental data. Note that our analysis may not factor in the latest price-sensitive company announcements or qualitative material. Simply Wall St has no position in any stocks mentioned.

Have feedback on this article? Concerned about the content? Get in touch with us directly. Alternatively, email editorial-team@simplywallst.com