Advertisement
Singapore markets open in 4 hours 11 minutes
  • Straits Times Index

    3,404.47
    -6.34 (-0.19%)
     
  • S&P 500

    5,572.85
    +5.66 (+0.10%)
     
  • Dow

    39,344.79
    -31.08 (-0.08%)
     
  • Nasdaq

    18,403.74
    +50.98 (+0.28%)
     
  • Bitcoin USD

    56,262.00
    -997.58 (-1.74%)
     
  • CMC Crypto 200

    1,209.33
    +43.21 (+3.70%)
     
  • FTSE 100

    8,193.49
    -10.44 (-0.13%)
     
  • Gold

    2,367.10
    -30.60 (-1.28%)
     
  • Crude Oil

    82.29
    -0.87 (-1.05%)
     
  • 10-Yr Bond

    4.2690
    -0.0030 (-0.07%)
     
  • Nikkei

    40,780.70
    -131.67 (-0.32%)
     
  • Hang Seng

    17,524.06
    -275.55 (-1.55%)
     
  • FTSE Bursa Malaysia

    1,611.02
    -5.73 (-0.35%)
     
  • Jakarta Composite Index

    7,250.98
    -7,253.37 (-50.01%)
     
  • PSE Index

    6,529.43
    +36.68 (+0.56%)
     

Eco World Development Group Berhad's (KLSE:ECOWLD) largest shareholders are private companies with 48% ownership, insiders own 21%

Key Insights

  • Significant control over Eco World Development Group Berhad by private companies implies that the general public has more power to influence management and governance-related decisions

  • A total of 3 investors have a majority stake in the company with 51% ownership

  • Insider ownership in Eco World Development Group Berhad is 21%

Every investor in Eco World Development Group Berhad (KLSE:ECOWLD) should be aware of the most powerful shareholder groups. We can see that private companies own the lion's share in the company with 48% ownership. That is, the group stands to benefit the most if the stock rises (or lose the most if there is a downturn).

Individual insiders, on the other hand, account for 21% of the company's stockholders. Generally speaking, as a company grows, institutions will increase their ownership. Conversely, insiders often decrease their ownership over time.

ADVERTISEMENT

Let's take a closer look to see what the different types of shareholders can tell us about Eco World Development Group Berhad.

View our latest analysis for Eco World Development Group Berhad

ownership-breakdown
ownership-breakdown

What Does The Institutional Ownership Tell Us About Eco World Development Group Berhad?

Institutional investors commonly compare their own returns to the returns of a commonly followed index. So they generally do consider buying larger companies that are included in the relevant benchmark index.

Eco World Development Group Berhad already has institutions on the share registry. Indeed, they own a respectable stake in the company. This implies the analysts working for those institutions have looked at the stock and they like it. But just like anyone else, they could be wrong. When multiple institutions own a stock, there's always a risk that they are in a 'crowded trade'. When such a trade goes wrong, multiple parties may compete to sell stock fast. This risk is higher in a company without a history of growth. You can see Eco World Development Group Berhad's historic earnings and revenue below, but keep in mind there's always more to the story.

earnings-and-revenue-growth
earnings-and-revenue-growth

We note that hedge funds don't have a meaningful investment in Eco World Development Group Berhad. Syabas Tropikal Sdn Bhd is currently the company's largest shareholder with 33% of shares outstanding. For context, the second largest shareholder holds about 10% of the shares outstanding, followed by an ownership of 7.5% by the third-largest shareholder. Kee Liew, who is the second-largest shareholder, also happens to hold the title of Top Key Executive.

To make our study more interesting, we found that the top 3 shareholders have a majority ownership in the company, meaning that they are powerful enough to influence the decisions of the company.

While it makes sense to study institutional ownership data for a company, it also makes sense to study analyst sentiments to know which way the wind is blowing. There are plenty of analysts covering the stock, so it might be worth seeing what they are forecasting, too.

Insider Ownership Of Eco World Development Group Berhad

While the precise definition of an insider can be subjective, almost everyone considers board members to be insiders. Management ultimately answers to the board. However, it is not uncommon for managers to be executive board members, especially if they are a founder or the CEO.

Insider ownership is positive when it signals leadership are thinking like the true owners of the company. However, high insider ownership can also give immense power to a small group within the company. This can be negative in some circumstances.

Our information suggests that insiders maintain a significant holding in Eco World Development Group Berhad. Insiders own RM918m worth of shares in the RM4.4b company. This may suggest that the founders still own a lot of shares. You can click here to see if they have been buying or selling.

General Public Ownership

The general public-- including retail investors -- own 19% stake in the company, and hence can't easily be ignored. This size of ownership, while considerable, may not be enough to change company policy if the decision is not in sync with other large shareholders.

Private Company Ownership

We can see that Private Companies own 48%, of the shares on issue. It might be worth looking deeper into this. If related parties, such as insiders, have an interest in one of these private companies, that should be disclosed in the annual report. Private companies may also have a strategic interest in the company.

Next Steps:

I find it very interesting to look at who exactly owns a company. But to truly gain insight, we need to consider other information, too. Consider risks, for instance. Every company has them, and we've spotted 3 warning signs for Eco World Development Group Berhad you should know about.

If you would prefer discover what analysts are predicting in terms of future growth, do not miss this free report on analyst forecasts.

NB: Figures in this article are calculated using data from the last twelve months, which refer to the 12-month period ending on the last date of the month the financial statement is dated. This may not be consistent with full year annual report figures.

Have feedback on this article? Concerned about the content? Get in touch with us directly. Alternatively, email editorial-team (at) simplywallst.com.

This article by Simply Wall St is general in nature. We provide commentary based on historical data and analyst forecasts only using an unbiased methodology and our articles are not intended to be financial advice. It does not constitute a recommendation to buy or sell any stock, and does not take account of your objectives, or your financial situation. We aim to bring you long-term focused analysis driven by fundamental data. Note that our analysis may not factor in the latest price-sensitive company announcements or qualitative material. Simply Wall St has no position in any stocks mentioned.