Advertisement
Singapore markets closed
  • Straits Times Index

    3,415.51
    +47.61 (+1.41%)
     
  • S&P 500

    5,509.01
    +33.92 (+0.62%)
     
  • Dow

    39,331.85
    +162.33 (+0.41%)
     
  • Nasdaq

    18,028.76
    +149.46 (+0.84%)
     
  • Bitcoin USD

    60,237.36
    -2,330.37 (-3.72%)
     
  • CMC Crypto 200

    1,296.43
    -38.48 (-2.88%)
     
  • FTSE 100

    8,167.70
    +46.50 (+0.57%)
     
  • Gold

    2,356.80
    +23.40 (+1.00%)
     
  • Crude Oil

    82.85
    +0.04 (+0.05%)
     
  • 10-Yr Bond

    4.4360
    -0.0430 (-0.96%)
     
  • Nikkei

    40,580.76
    +506.07 (+1.26%)
     
  • Hang Seng

    17,978.57
    +209.43 (+1.18%)
     
  • FTSE Bursa Malaysia

    1,615.32
    +17.36 (+1.09%)
     
  • Jakarta Composite Index

    7,196.75
    +71.61 (+1.01%)
     
  • PSE Index

    6,450.03
    +91.07 (+1.43%)
     

'Bullying' China spurs US to limit advanced tech exports: American ambassador

US restrictions on advanced technology exports to China are driven by greater evidence of Beijing's increasingly "aggressive" stance and an analysis of how it would likely use these tools as it "bullies" some neighbours, a senior US diplomat said on Thursday.

"We have to expect those technologies will be militarised, and we do not intend to be number two," said Nicholas Burns, the US ambassador to China, in remarks delivered at the Asia Society in New York.

Washington's response to Beijing has included limits on advanced semiconductors, artificial-intelligence processors, semiconductor-making equipment and even some laptops.

Do you have questions about the biggest topics and trends from around the world? Get the answers with SCMP Knowledge, our new platform of curated content with explainers, FAQs, analyses and infographics brought to you by our award-winning team.

ADVERTISEMENT

After vowing to review steep import tariffs and export restrictions introduced by former US president Donald Trump and precipitating a bilateral trade war, the Joe Biden administration has doubled down on such measures.

As justification for Washington's analysis, Burns cited Beijing's island-building in the South China Sea as well as its territorial squabbles with Japan, Vietnam, the Philippines, India, Malaysia and Brunei.

'We're concerned about the bullying of China's neighbours in the South China Sea and the East China Sea," said Burns, adding that it was not always easy to read the impetus behind Beijing's muscular policies and what lies ahead.

"I don't have a crystal ball, but we've seen consistent aggression."

The career diplomat, who has held assignments at the National Security Council and Nato, said a growing number of Chinese foreign policies simultaneously angered the United States, European Union, Japan, South Korea, India and Southeast Asian nations.

That pattern raised questions about Beijing's willingness to upset so many foreign countries, seemingly against its own national interest, Burns added.

"I can't speak for the government of China," he said. "You see a China that seems very confident, at least it did, about its power."

Burns believed the days when Washington and other capitals were able to influence Chinese decision-making, encouraging Beijing to join the World Trade Organization and otherwise become a "responsible stakeholder", were a distant memory.

Burns (left), at the Asia Society in New York on Thursday, says the US now holds little sway over China's decision-making. Photo: SCMP alt=Burns (left), at the Asia Society in New York on Thursday, says the US now holds little sway over China's decision-making. Photo: SCMP>

As recently as the early 2000s, Beijing was willing to work cooperatively with Washington on sanctioning Iran, opposing North Korea's testing of nuclear weapons and trying to help stabilise conditions in Afghanistan, he added.

"We're way past that," Burns said. "We didn't change ... It's that China has."

Among the Chinese policies the envoy found "pernicious" were exports by Chinese companies to support Russia's industrial base in its war with Ukraine.

The armed conflict, now in its third year, has brought the US and Europe closer together and led Washington last month to sanction nearly two dozen Chinese companies.

The Chinese embassy in Washington did not immediately respond to a request for comment.

"China is increasingly the factory of the Russian war machine," said Daleep Singh of the National Security Council, speaking separately on Thursday at the Washington-based Centre for a New American Security.

"We've got to think about the entire Russian economy as being off-limits in terms of facilitating the flow of goods that are showing up on the battlefield and giving Russia advantage," Singh added.

A firefighter works at the site of a shopping centre hit by a Russian military strike in Kherson, Ukraine, on Thursday. Photo: Handout via Reuters alt=A firefighter works at the site of a shopping centre hit by a Russian military strike in Kherson, Ukraine, on Thursday. Photo: Handout via Reuters>

Additional concern has centred on what Burns called China's wholesale "dumping" of solar panels, lithium batteries, cars and other products on foreign markets.

Critics have argued the practice of selling goods at below-market prices is meant to wipe out overseas competitors.

Beijing's increasingly hardline policies are convincing more countries to establish or strengthen strategic relations with the US, Burns said.

He noted Japan's decision to double its defence budget as well as the willingness of Britain and some European countries to adopt a more active role in the Indo-Pacific region.

While Beijing often speaks of its "core interests", the US has its own that it is unwilling to budge on, he said, including its support for Europe, treaty obligations with such allies as Japan and the Philippines and support for human rights and free speech.

But Burns also underscored the importance of diplomacy and communication as bilateral tensions mount.

"It's important as we look to the future that we do everything we can to drive down the possibility or probability of conflict," he said. "Conflict would be catastrophic for the whole world. That's why the militaries have to talk to each other.

"Despite our differences, we have to talk to each other," he added, citing some positive developments arising from Sino-American competition likely to last well into the next decade. "That's what diplomacy is all about."

As an outgrowth of last November's summit in California between Biden and Chinese President Xi Jinping, US Defence Secretary Lloyd Austin and his Chinese counterpart, Dong Jun, met last week in Singapore.

It marked the first in-person meeting between the two countries' defence chiefs in two years.

The two sides have also started discussing AI and Chinese-made chemical precursors used in making fentanyl, a leading cause of death among young Americans.

In addition, people-to-people relations are slowing rebounding, although the number of Americans studying in China is still low, at 850, compared with nearly 300,000 Chinese studying in the US.

"We put the relationship on a much more stable footing at that summit," said Jon Finer, a US deputy national security adviser, speaking separately at the CNAS event.

"But during the course of the last 12-to-18 months, we also did not in any way take our foot off the gas in terms of competitive actions vis-a-vis the Chinese," Finer added.

During Burns' appearance at the Asia Society, two protesters stood up in quick succession, criticising the Biden administration for policies that they decried as amounting to a "two-front war" against Russia and China. The two were escorted out.

Burns, addressing their comments, said the US makes mistakes and, unlike some other countries, allows its citizens to speak out and question its leaders.

Additional reporting by Bochen Han in Washington

This article originally appeared in the South China Morning Post (SCMP), the most authoritative voice reporting on China and Asia for more than a century. For more SCMP stories, please explore the SCMP app or visit the SCMP's Facebook and Twitter pages. Copyright © 2024 South China Morning Post Publishers Ltd. All rights reserved.

Copyright (c) 2024. South China Morning Post Publishers Ltd. All rights reserved.