Advertisement
Singapore markets close in 1 hour 27 minutes
  • Straits Times Index

    3,412.56
    -27.32 (-0.79%)
     
  • Nikkei

    40,912.37
    -1.28 (-0.00%)
     
  • Hang Seng

    17,863.27
    -165.01 (-0.92%)
     
  • FTSE 100

    8,272.75
    +31.49 (+0.38%)
     
  • Bitcoin USD

    54,155.77
    -4,316.58 (-7.38%)
     
  • CMC Crypto 200

    1,125.04
    -83.66 (-6.92%)
     
  • S&P 500

    5,537.02
    +28.01 (+0.51%)
     
  • Dow

    39,308.00
    -23.90 (-0.06%)
     
  • Nasdaq

    18,188.30
    +159.54 (+0.88%)
     
  • Gold

    2,371.20
    +1.80 (+0.08%)
     
  • Crude Oil

    84.11
    +0.23 (+0.27%)
     
  • 10-Yr Bond

    4.3550
    0.0000 (0.00%)
     
  • FTSE Bursa Malaysia

    1,612.57
    -4.18 (-0.26%)
     
  • Jakarta Composite Index

    7,240.96
    +20.07 (+0.28%)
     
  • PSE Index

    6,492.75
    -14.74 (-0.23%)
     

Braze, Inc. (NASDAQ:BRZE) is largely controlled by institutional shareholders who own 57% of the company

Key Insights

  • Significantly high institutional ownership implies Braze's stock price is sensitive to their trading actions

  • 52% of the business is held by the top 8 shareholders

  • Insiders have been selling lately

To get a sense of who is truly in control of Braze, Inc. (NASDAQ:BRZE), it is important to understand the ownership structure of the business. And the group that holds the biggest piece of the pie are institutions with 57% ownership. Put another way, the group faces the maximum upside potential (or downside risk).

Because institutional owners have a huge pool of resources and liquidity, their investing decisions tend to carry a great deal of weight, especially with individual investors. Therefore, a good portion of institutional money invested in the company is usually a huge vote of confidence on its future.

ADVERTISEMENT

Let's take a closer look to see what the different types of shareholders can tell us about Braze.

Check out our latest analysis for Braze

ownership-breakdown
ownership-breakdown

What Does The Institutional Ownership Tell Us About Braze?

Institutions typically measure themselves against a benchmark when reporting to their own investors, so they often become more enthusiastic about a stock once it's included in a major index. We would expect most companies to have some institutions on the register, especially if they are growing.

We can see that Braze does have institutional investors; and they hold a good portion of the company's stock. This implies the analysts working for those institutions have looked at the stock and they like it. But just like anyone else, they could be wrong. When multiple institutions own a stock, there's always a risk that they are in a 'crowded trade'. When such a trade goes wrong, multiple parties may compete to sell stock fast. This risk is higher in a company without a history of growth. You can see Braze's historic earnings and revenue below, but keep in mind there's always more to the story.

earnings-and-revenue-growth
earnings-and-revenue-growth

Investors should note that institutions actually own more than half the company, so they can collectively wield significant power. We note that hedge funds don't have a meaningful investment in Braze. Looking at our data, we can see that the largest shareholder is ICONIQ Capital, LLC with 13% of shares outstanding. In comparison, the second and third largest shareholders hold about 10% and 8.6% of the stock. In addition, we found that William Magnuson, the CEO has 3.5% of the shares allocated to their name.

We did some more digging and found that 8 of the top shareholders account for roughly 52% of the register, implying that along with larger shareholders, there are a few smaller shareholders, thereby balancing out each others interests somewhat.

While it makes sense to study institutional ownership data for a company, it also makes sense to study analyst sentiments to know which way the wind is blowing. Quite a few analysts cover the stock, so you could look into forecast growth quite easily.

Insider Ownership Of Braze

The definition of an insider can differ slightly between different countries, but members of the board of directors always count. Company management run the business, but the CEO will answer to the board, even if he or she is a member of it.

Most consider insider ownership a positive because it can indicate the board is well aligned with other shareholders. However, on some occasions too much power is concentrated within this group.

Shareholders would probably be interested to learn that insiders own shares in Braze, Inc.. It is a pretty big company, so it is generally a positive to see some potentially meaningful alignment. In this case, they own around US$508m worth of shares (at current prices). If you would like to explore the question of insider alignment, you can click here to see if insiders have been buying or selling.

General Public Ownership

The general public, who are usually individual investors, hold a 15% stake in Braze. This size of ownership, while considerable, may not be enough to change company policy if the decision is not in sync with other large shareholders.

Private Equity Ownership

Private equity firms hold a 10% stake in Braze. This suggests they can be influential in key policy decisions. Some investors might be encouraged by this, since private equity are sometimes able to encourage strategies that help the market see the value in the company. Alternatively, those holders might be exiting the investment after taking it public.

Private Company Ownership

Our data indicates that Private Companies hold 8.6%, of the company's shares. It might be worth looking deeper into this. If related parties, such as insiders, have an interest in one of these private companies, that should be disclosed in the annual report. Private companies may also have a strategic interest in the company.

Next Steps:

I find it very interesting to look at who exactly owns a company. But to truly gain insight, we need to consider other information, too. Take risks for example - Braze has 3 warning signs we think you should be aware of.

But ultimately it is the future, not the past, that will determine how well the owners of this business will do. Therefore we think it advisable to take a look at this free report showing whether analysts are predicting a brighter future.

NB: Figures in this article are calculated using data from the last twelve months, which refer to the 12-month period ending on the last date of the month the financial statement is dated. This may not be consistent with full year annual report figures.

Have feedback on this article? Concerned about the content? Get in touch with us directly. Alternatively, email editorial-team (at) simplywallst.com.

This article by Simply Wall St is general in nature. We provide commentary based on historical data and analyst forecasts only using an unbiased methodology and our articles are not intended to be financial advice. It does not constitute a recommendation to buy or sell any stock, and does not take account of your objectives, or your financial situation. We aim to bring you long-term focused analysis driven by fundamental data. Note that our analysis may not factor in the latest price-sensitive company announcements or qualitative material. Simply Wall St has no position in any stocks mentioned.