Advertisement
Singapore markets closed
  • Straits Times Index

    3,338.57
    +5.77 (+0.17%)
     
  • S&P 500

    5,460.48
    -22.39 (-0.41%)
     
  • Dow

    39,118.86
    -45.24 (-0.12%)
     
  • Nasdaq

    17,732.60
    -126.10 (-0.71%)
     
  • Bitcoin USD

    62,568.11
    +1,139.20 (+1.85%)
     
  • CMC Crypto 200

    1,300.63
    -1.44 (-0.11%)
     
  • FTSE 100

    8,194.79
    +30.67 (+0.38%)
     
  • Gold

    2,346.60
    +7.00 (+0.30%)
     
  • Crude Oil

    81.97
    +0.43 (+0.53%)
     
  • 10-Yr Bond

    4.3430
    +0.0550 (+1.28%)
     
  • Nikkei

    39,631.06
    +47.98 (+0.12%)
     
  • Hang Seng

    17,718.61
    +2.11 (+0.01%)
     
  • FTSE Bursa Malaysia

    1,598.20
    +8.11 (+0.51%)
     
  • Jakarta Composite Index

    7,139.63
    +76.05 (+1.08%)
     
  • PSE Index

    6,398.77
    -13.14 (-0.20%)
     

With 83% ownership of the shares, Treatt plc (LON:TET) is heavily dominated by institutional owners

Key Insights

  • Institutions' substantial holdings in Treatt implies that they have significant influence over the company's share price

  • The top 15 shareholders own 50% of the company

  • Ownership research along with analyst forecasts data help provide a good understanding of opportunities in a stock

If you want to know who really controls Treatt plc (LON:TET), then you'll have to look at the makeup of its share registry. And the group that holds the biggest piece of the pie are institutions with 83% ownership. In other words, the group stands to gain the most (or lose the most) from their investment into the company.

Given the vast amount of money and research capacities at their disposal, institutional ownership tends to carry a lot of weight, especially with individual investors. Hence, having a considerable amount of institutional money invested in a company is often regarded as a desirable trait.

ADVERTISEMENT

Let's delve deeper into each type of owner of Treatt, beginning with the chart below.

See our latest analysis for Treatt

ownership-breakdown
ownership-breakdown

What Does The Institutional Ownership Tell Us About Treatt?

Institutions typically measure themselves against a benchmark when reporting to their own investors, so they often become more enthusiastic about a stock once it's included in a major index. We would expect most companies to have some institutions on the register, especially if they are growing.

We can see that Treatt does have institutional investors; and they hold a good portion of the company's stock. This can indicate that the company has a certain degree of credibility in the investment community. However, it is best to be wary of relying on the supposed validation that comes with institutional investors. They too, get it wrong sometimes. When multiple institutions own a stock, there's always a risk that they are in a 'crowded trade'. When such a trade goes wrong, multiple parties may compete to sell stock fast. This risk is higher in a company without a history of growth. You can see Treatt's historic earnings and revenue below, but keep in mind there's always more to the story.

earnings-and-revenue-growth
earnings-and-revenue-growth

Since institutional investors own more than half the issued stock, the board will likely have to pay attention to their preferences. We note that hedge funds don't have a meaningful investment in Treatt. Looking at our data, we can see that the largest shareholder is abrdn plc with 7.2% of shares outstanding. In comparison, the second and third largest shareholders hold about 6.2% and 4.1% of the stock.

Looking at the shareholder registry, we can see that 50% of the ownership is controlled by the top 15 shareholders, meaning that no single shareholder has a majority interest in the ownership.

Researching institutional ownership is a good way to gauge and filter a stock's expected performance. The same can be achieved by studying analyst sentiments. Quite a few analysts cover the stock, so you could look into forecast growth quite easily.

Insider Ownership Of Treatt

While the precise definition of an insider can be subjective, almost everyone considers board members to be insiders. The company management answer to the board and the latter should represent the interests of shareholders. Notably, sometimes top-level managers are on the board themselves.

Most consider insider ownership a positive because it can indicate the board is well aligned with other shareholders. However, on some occasions too much power is concentrated within this group.

Our most recent data indicates that insiders own less than 1% of Treatt plc. It has a market capitalization of just UK£261m, and the board has only UK£65k worth of shares in their own names. Many investors in smaller companies prefer to see the board more heavily invested. You can click here to see if those insiders have been buying or selling.

General Public Ownership

The general public, who are usually individual investors, hold a 15% stake in Treatt. While this size of ownership may not be enough to sway a policy decision in their favour, they can still make a collective impact on company policies.

Next Steps:

It's always worth thinking about the different groups who own shares in a company. But to understand Treatt better, we need to consider many other factors. Consider for instance, the ever-present spectre of investment risk. We've identified 1 warning sign with Treatt , and understanding them should be part of your investment process.

Ultimately the future is most important. You can access this free report on analyst forecasts for the company.

NB: Figures in this article are calculated using data from the last twelve months, which refer to the 12-month period ending on the last date of the month the financial statement is dated. This may not be consistent with full year annual report figures.

Have feedback on this article? Concerned about the content? Get in touch with us directly. Alternatively, email editorial-team (at) simplywallst.com.

This article by Simply Wall St is general in nature. We provide commentary based on historical data and analyst forecasts only using an unbiased methodology and our articles are not intended to be financial advice. It does not constitute a recommendation to buy or sell any stock, and does not take account of your objectives, or your financial situation. We aim to bring you long-term focused analysis driven by fundamental data. Note that our analysis may not factor in the latest price-sensitive company announcements or qualitative material. Simply Wall St has no position in any stocks mentioned.

Have feedback on this article? Concerned about the content? Get in touch with us directly. Alternatively, email editorial-team@simplywallst.com