Advertisement
Singapore markets open in 4 hours 2 minutes
  • Straits Times Index

    3,332.80
    -10.55 (-0.32%)
     
  • S&P 500

    5,460.48
    -22.39 (-0.41%)
     
  • Dow

    39,118.86
    -45.24 (-0.12%)
     
  • Nasdaq

    17,732.60
    -126.10 (-0.71%)
     
  • Bitcoin USD

    61,951.56
    +1,000.28 (+1.64%)
     
  • CMC Crypto 200

    1,288.51
    +4.68 (+0.36%)
     
  • FTSE 100

    8,164.12
    -15.56 (-0.19%)
     
  • Gold

    2,336.90
    -2.70 (-0.12%)
     
  • Crude Oil

    81.46
    -0.08 (-0.10%)
     
  • 10-Yr Bond

    4.3430
    +0.0550 (+1.28%)
     
  • Nikkei

    39,583.08
    +241.58 (+0.61%)
     
  • Hang Seng

    17,718.61
    +2.11 (+0.01%)
     
  • FTSE Bursa Malaysia

    1,590.09
    +5.15 (+0.32%)
     
  • Jakarta Composite Index

    7,063.58
    -6,967.95 (-49.66%)
     
  • PSE Index

    6,411.91
    +21.33 (+0.33%)
     

With 63% ownership of the shares, Cardlytics, Inc. (NASDAQ:CDLX) is heavily dominated by institutional owners

Key Insights

  • Significantly high institutional ownership implies Cardlytics' stock price is sensitive to their trading actions

  • 51% of the business is held by the top 16 shareholders

  • Ownership research along with analyst forecasts data help provide a good understanding of opportunities in a stock

Every investor in Cardlytics, Inc. (NASDAQ:CDLX) should be aware of the most powerful shareholder groups. The group holding the most number of shares in the company, around 63% to be precise, is institutions. Put another way, the group faces the maximum upside potential (or downside risk).

Since institutional have access to huge amounts of capital, their market moves tend to receive a lot of scrutiny by retail or individual investors. As a result, a sizeable amount of institutional money invested in a firm is generally viewed as a positive attribute.

ADVERTISEMENT

In the chart below, we zoom in on the different ownership groups of Cardlytics.

Check out our latest analysis for Cardlytics

ownership-breakdown
ownership-breakdown

What Does The Institutional Ownership Tell Us About Cardlytics?

Institutions typically measure themselves against a benchmark when reporting to their own investors, so they often become more enthusiastic about a stock once it's included in a major index. We would expect most companies to have some institutions on the register, especially if they are growing.

We can see that Cardlytics does have institutional investors; and they hold a good portion of the company's stock. This suggests some credibility amongst professional investors. But we can't rely on that fact alone since institutions make bad investments sometimes, just like everyone does. It is not uncommon to see a big share price drop if two large institutional investors try to sell out of a stock at the same time. So it is worth checking the past earnings trajectory of Cardlytics, (below). Of course, keep in mind that there are other factors to consider, too.

earnings-and-revenue-growth
earnings-and-revenue-growth

Investors should note that institutions actually own more than half the company, so they can collectively wield significant power. Our data indicates that hedge funds own 13% of Cardlytics. That catches my attention because hedge funds sometimes try to influence management, or bring about changes that will create near term value for shareholders. CAS Investment Partners, LLC is currently the company's largest shareholder with 13% of shares outstanding. In comparison, the second and third largest shareholders hold about 5.9% and 4.5% of the stock. In addition, we found that Karim Temsamani, the CEO has 0.8% of the shares allocated to their name.

Looking at the shareholder registry, we can see that 51% of the ownership is controlled by the top 16 shareholders, meaning that no single shareholder has a majority interest in the ownership.

Researching institutional ownership is a good way to gauge and filter a stock's expected performance. The same can be achieved by studying analyst sentiments. There are a reasonable number of analysts covering the stock, so it might be useful to find out their aggregate view on the future.

Insider Ownership Of Cardlytics

The definition of an insider can differ slightly between different countries, but members of the board of directors always count. The company management answer to the board and the latter should represent the interests of shareholders. Notably, sometimes top-level managers are on the board themselves.

I generally consider insider ownership to be a good thing. However, on some occasions it makes it more difficult for other shareholders to hold the board accountable for decisions.

Our most recent data indicates that insiders own some shares in Cardlytics, Inc.. It has a market capitalization of just US$394m, and insiders have US$7.4m worth of shares, in their own names. Some would say this shows alignment of interests between shareholders and the board. But it might be worth checking if those insiders have been selling.

General Public Ownership

The general public, who are usually individual investors, hold a 22% stake in Cardlytics. While this group can't necessarily call the shots, it can certainly have a real influence on how the company is run.

Next Steps:

While it is well worth considering the different groups that own a company, there are other factors that are even more important. For instance, we've identified 3 warning signs for Cardlytics that you should be aware of.

If you would prefer discover what analysts are predicting in terms of future growth, do not miss this free report on analyst forecasts.

NB: Figures in this article are calculated using data from the last twelve months, which refer to the 12-month period ending on the last date of the month the financial statement is dated. This may not be consistent with full year annual report figures.

Have feedback on this article? Concerned about the content? Get in touch with us directly. Alternatively, email editorial-team (at) simplywallst.com.

This article by Simply Wall St is general in nature. We provide commentary based on historical data and analyst forecasts only using an unbiased methodology and our articles are not intended to be financial advice. It does not constitute a recommendation to buy or sell any stock, and does not take account of your objectives, or your financial situation. We aim to bring you long-term focused analysis driven by fundamental data. Note that our analysis may not factor in the latest price-sensitive company announcements or qualitative material. Simply Wall St has no position in any stocks mentioned.

Have feedback on this article? Concerned about the content? Get in touch with us directly. Alternatively, email editorial-team@simplywallst.com