Advertisement
Singapore markets close in 3 hours 17 minutes
  • Straits Times Index

    3,322.71
    +8.57 (+0.26%)
     
  • Nikkei

    39,091.81
    +287.16 (+0.74%)
     
  • Hang Seng

    18,134.88
    +107.17 (+0.59%)
     
  • FTSE 100

    8,281.55
    +43.83 (+0.53%)
     
  • Bitcoin USD

    61,111.49
    -1,383.00 (-2.21%)
     
  • CMC Crypto 200

    1,273.88
    -35.84 (-2.74%)
     
  • S&P 500

    5,447.87
    -16.75 (-0.31%)
     
  • Dow

    39,411.21
    +260.88 (+0.67%)
     
  • Nasdaq

    17,496.82
    -192.54 (-1.09%)
     
  • Gold

    2,340.80
    -3.60 (-0.15%)
     
  • Crude Oil

    81.73
    +0.10 (+0.12%)
     
  • 10-Yr Bond

    4.2480
    -0.0090 (-0.21%)
     
  • FTSE Bursa Malaysia

    1,587.68
    -1.98 (-0.12%)
     
  • Jakarta Composite Index

    6,868.73
    -20.44 (-0.30%)
     
  • PSE Index

    6,299.17
    +26.71 (+0.43%)
     

1st Source Corporation (NASDAQ:SRCE) is definitely on the radar of institutional investors who own 47% of the company

Key Insights

  • Institutions' substantial holdings in 1st Source implies that they have significant influence over the company's share price

  • A total of 9 investors have a majority stake in the company with 52% ownership

  • Insiders have been buying lately

Every investor in 1st Source Corporation (NASDAQ:SRCE) should be aware of the most powerful shareholder groups. The group holding the most number of shares in the company, around 47% to be precise, is institutions. In other words, the group stands to gain the most (or lose the most) from their investment into the company.

Given the vast amount of money and research capacities at their disposal, institutional ownership tends to carry a lot of weight, especially with individual investors. Hence, having a considerable amount of institutional money invested in a company is often regarded as a desirable trait.

ADVERTISEMENT

In the chart below, we zoom in on the different ownership groups of 1st Source.

View our latest analysis for 1st Source

ownership-breakdown
ownership-breakdown

What Does The Institutional Ownership Tell Us About 1st Source?

Institutions typically measure themselves against a benchmark when reporting to their own investors, so they often become more enthusiastic about a stock once it's included in a major index. We would expect most companies to have some institutions on the register, especially if they are growing.

As you can see, institutional investors have a fair amount of stake in 1st Source. This can indicate that the company has a certain degree of credibility in the investment community. However, it is best to be wary of relying on the supposed validation that comes with institutional investors. They too, get it wrong sometimes. When multiple institutions own a stock, there's always a risk that they are in a 'crowded trade'. When such a trade goes wrong, multiple parties may compete to sell stock fast. This risk is higher in a company without a history of growth. You can see 1st Source's historic earnings and revenue below, but keep in mind there's always more to the story.

earnings-and-revenue-growth
earnings-and-revenue-growth

We note that hedge funds don't have a meaningful investment in 1st Source. The company's CEO Christopher Murphy is the largest shareholder with 18% of shares outstanding. For context, the second largest shareholder holds about 6.4% of the shares outstanding, followed by an ownership of 5.9% by the third-largest shareholder.

We also observed that the top 9 shareholders account for more than half of the share register, with a few smaller shareholders to balance the interests of the larger ones to a certain extent.

While it makes sense to study institutional ownership data for a company, it also makes sense to study analyst sentiments to know which way the wind is blowing. There are a reasonable number of analysts covering the stock, so it might be useful to find out their aggregate view on the future.

Insider Ownership Of 1st Source

The definition of company insiders can be subjective and does vary between jurisdictions. Our data reflects individual insiders, capturing board members at the very least. Company management run the business, but the CEO will answer to the board, even if he or she is a member of it.

Most consider insider ownership a positive because it can indicate the board is well aligned with other shareholders. However, on some occasions too much power is concentrated within this group.

Our most recent data indicates that insiders own a reasonable proportion of 1st Source Corporation. It has a market capitalization of just US$1.3b, and insiders have US$397m worth of shares in their own names. That's quite significant. Most would say this shows a good degree of alignment with shareholders, especially in a company of this size. You can click here to see if those insiders have been buying or selling.

General Public Ownership

The general public-- including retail investors -- own 19% stake in the company, and hence can't easily be ignored. This size of ownership, while considerable, may not be enough to change company policy if the decision is not in sync with other large shareholders.

Next Steps:

While it is well worth considering the different groups that own a company, there are other factors that are even more important. Case in point: We've spotted 1 warning sign for 1st Source you should be aware of.

Ultimately the future is most important. You can access this free report on analyst forecasts for the company.

NB: Figures in this article are calculated using data from the last twelve months, which refer to the 12-month period ending on the last date of the month the financial statement is dated. This may not be consistent with full year annual report figures.

Have feedback on this article? Concerned about the content? Get in touch with us directly. Alternatively, email editorial-team (at) simplywallst.com.

This article by Simply Wall St is general in nature. We provide commentary based on historical data and analyst forecasts only using an unbiased methodology and our articles are not intended to be financial advice. It does not constitute a recommendation to buy or sell any stock, and does not take account of your objectives, or your financial situation. We aim to bring you long-term focused analysis driven by fundamental data. Note that our analysis may not factor in the latest price-sensitive company announcements or qualitative material. Simply Wall St has no position in any stocks mentioned.