Advertisement
Singapore markets closed
  • Straits Times Index

    3,290.70
    +24.75 (+0.76%)
     
  • Nikkei

    38,229.11
    +155.13 (+0.41%)
     
  • Hang Seng

    18,963.68
    +425.87 (+2.30%)
     
  • FTSE 100

    8,433.76
    +52.41 (+0.63%)
     
  • Bitcoin USD

    60,854.01
    -2,076.40 (-3.30%)
     
  • CMC Crypto 200

    1,260.86
    -97.15 (-7.15%)
     
  • S&P 500

    5,222.68
    +8.60 (+0.16%)
     
  • Dow

    39,512.84
    +125.08 (+0.32%)
     
  • Nasdaq

    16,340.87
    -5.40 (-0.03%)
     
  • Gold

    2,366.90
    +26.60 (+1.14%)
     
  • Crude Oil

    78.20
    -1.06 (-1.34%)
     
  • 10-Yr Bond

    4.5040
    +0.0550 (+1.24%)
     
  • FTSE Bursa Malaysia

    1,600.67
    -0.55 (-0.03%)
     
  • Jakarta Composite Index

    7,088.79
    -34.81 (-0.49%)
     
  • PSE Index

    6,511.93
    -30.53 (-0.47%)
     

Is it time for the four-day work week?

Is the time ripe for introducing four-day working weeks?

The pandemic has caused unemployment to soar and has turned the working world on its head.

But some say the solution to the crisis lies not in working more, but in working less.

“... this rapid transition to new ways of working also opens up opportunities for reducing working time overall.”

Aidan Harper works for the New Economic Foundation think tank and is championing the call for four-day working week.

“In the UK in particular, working time reduction, basically flat lines since 1980, despite the fact that productivity has continued to increase up until 2008. So what I would say is that our economy at this point in time is productive enough to rapidly reduce working time for the vast majority of people.”

ADVERTISEMENT

It’s not a new concept.

Unilever is one the biggest brands trialling the initiative in New Zealand, where Prime Minister Jacinnda Ardern has encouraged the policy.

Not only could it help with mental health, but it could reap significant environmental gains, too.

“There are many ways in which work time relates to things like carbon emissions and this intuitive argument in many ways. So if you have more time, you are less likely to engage in carbon intensive activities. So you're you're more likely to walk or cycle that drive. You more like to cook with fresh ingredients rather than buy expensive and carbon intensive frozen food products.”

Working four days but getting paid for five sounds too good to be true - and there is a fair share of sceptics.

The Confederation of British Industry cautioned that it could push many businesses into loss.

But proponents claim fewer hours doesn’t harm productivity.

“So there are three main ways in which we can see that decreasing hours is good for productivity and good for the economy. We can look at our own history to see that when we move from a six to a five day week, it was accompanied by an increase in productivity and it was good for the economy overall. We can also look at other countries and take a macro analysis and we can see that countries that work fewer hours tend to have much stronger economies and tend to be much more productive than countries that work lots of hours. And finally, we can see real and existing examples of firms and organizations who are experimenting with reductions in working hours. And they are doing this and seeing the increases in terms of increased well-being, decreased sick leave, decreased turnover. And it's clearly good for these organizations that they have reduced working time."