Advertisement
Singapore markets closed
  • Straits Times Index

    3,292.69
    +10.64 (+0.32%)
     
  • S&P 500

    5,116.17
    +16.21 (+0.32%)
     
  • Dow

    38,386.09
    +146.43 (+0.38%)
     
  • Nasdaq

    15,983.08
    +55.18 (+0.35%)
     
  • Bitcoin USD

    62,955.66
    -677.18 (-1.06%)
     
  • CMC Crypto 200

    1,273.95
    -65.11 (-4.86%)
     
  • FTSE 100

    8,187.01
    +39.98 (+0.49%)
     
  • Gold

    2,321.90
    -35.80 (-1.52%)
     
  • Crude Oil

    83.21
    +0.58 (+0.70%)
     
  • 10-Yr Bond

    4.6140
    -0.0550 (-1.18%)
     
  • Nikkei

    38,405.66
    +470.90 (+1.24%)
     
  • Hang Seng

    17,763.03
    +16.12 (+0.09%)
     
  • FTSE Bursa Malaysia

    1,575.97
    -6.69 (-0.42%)
     
  • Jakarta Composite Index

    7,234.20
    +78.41 (+1.10%)
     
  • PSE Index

    6,700.49
    -69.15 (-1.02%)
     

Owning 60% in Stamford Land Corporation Ltd (SGX:H07) means that insiders are heavily invested in the company's future

Key Insights

  • Stamford Land's significant insider ownership suggests inherent interests in company's expansion

  • The top 2 shareholders own 56% of the company

  • Ownership research, combined with past performance data can help provide a good understanding of opportunities in a stock

Every investor in Stamford Land Corporation Ltd (SGX:H07) should be aware of the most powerful shareholder groups. With 60% stake, individual insiders possess the maximum shares in the company. Put another way, the group faces the maximum upside potential (or downside risk).

With such a notable stake in the company, insiders would be highly incentivised to make value accretive decisions.

ADVERTISEMENT

Let's delve deeper into each type of owner of Stamford Land, beginning with the chart below.

See our latest analysis for Stamford Land

ownership-breakdown
ownership-breakdown

What Does The Institutional Ownership Tell Us About Stamford Land?

Many institutions measure their performance against an index that approximates the local market. So they usually pay more attention to companies that are included in major indices.

Institutions have a very small stake in Stamford Land. That indicates that the company is on the radar of some funds, but it isn't particularly popular with professional investors at the moment. So if the company itself can improve over time, we may well see more institutional buyers in the future. When multiple institutional investors want to buy shares, we often see a rising share price. The past revenue trajectory (shown below) can be an indication of future growth, but there are no guarantees.

earnings-and-revenue-growth
earnings-and-revenue-growth

Stamford Land is not owned by hedge funds. From our data, we infer that the largest shareholder is Chio Kiat Ow (who also holds the title of Top Key Executive) with 44% of shares outstanding. Its usually considered a good sign when insiders own a significant number of shares in the company, and in this case, we're glad to see a company insider play the role of a key stakeholder. Meanwhile, the second and third largest shareholders, hold 12% and 3.4%, of the shares outstanding, respectively. Interestingly, the second-largest shareholder, Yiling Ow is also Senior Key Executive, again, pointing towards strong insider ownership amongst the company's top shareholders. Furthermore, CEO Yew Heng Ow is the owner of 1.4% of the company's shares.

After doing some more digging, we found that the top 2 shareholders collectively control more than half of the company's shares, implying that they have considerable power to influence the company's decisions.

While studying institutional ownership for a company can add value to your research, it is also a good practice to research analyst recommendations to get a deeper understand of a stock's expected performance. We're not picking up on any analyst coverage of the stock at the moment, so the company is unlikely to be widely held.

Insider Ownership Of Stamford Land

The definition of company insiders can be subjective and does vary between jurisdictions. Our data reflects individual insiders, capturing board members at the very least. Management ultimately answers to the board. However, it is not uncommon for managers to be executive board members, especially if they are a founder or the CEO.

Insider ownership is positive when it signals leadership are thinking like the true owners of the company. However, high insider ownership can also give immense power to a small group within the company. This can be negative in some circumstances.

It seems that insiders own more than half the Stamford Land Corporation Ltd stock. This gives them a lot of power. That means they own S$349m worth of shares in the S$586m company. That's quite meaningful. Most would argue this is a positive, showing strong alignment with shareholders. You can click here to see if those insiders have been buying or selling.

General Public Ownership

The general public, who are usually individual investors, hold a 31% stake in Stamford Land. While this size of ownership may not be enough to sway a policy decision in their favour, they can still make a collective impact on company policies.

Private Company Ownership

Our data indicates that Private Companies hold 7.9%, of the company's shares. It's hard to draw any conclusions from this fact alone, so its worth looking into who owns those private companies. Sometimes insiders or other related parties have an interest in shares in a public company through a separate private company.

Next Steps:

I find it very interesting to look at who exactly owns a company. But to truly gain insight, we need to consider other information, too. Be aware that Stamford Land is showing 1 warning sign in our investment analysis , you should know about...

Of course this may not be the best stock to buy. So take a peek at this free free list of interesting companies.

NB: Figures in this article are calculated using data from the last twelve months, which refer to the 12-month period ending on the last date of the month the financial statement is dated. This may not be consistent with full year annual report figures.

Have feedback on this article? Concerned about the content? Get in touch with us directly. Alternatively, email editorial-team (at) simplywallst.com.

This article by Simply Wall St is general in nature. We provide commentary based on historical data and analyst forecasts only using an unbiased methodology and our articles are not intended to be financial advice. It does not constitute a recommendation to buy or sell any stock, and does not take account of your objectives, or your financial situation. We aim to bring you long-term focused analysis driven by fundamental data. Note that our analysis may not factor in the latest price-sensitive company announcements or qualitative material. Simply Wall St has no position in any stocks mentioned.