Advertisement
Singapore markets close in 4 hours 58 minutes
  • Straits Times Index

    3,314.14
    +6.24 (+0.19%)
     
  • Nikkei

    39,031.58
    +414.48 (+1.07%)
     
  • Hang Seng

    18,915.58
    -280.02 (-1.46%)
     
  • FTSE 100

    8,370.33
    -46.12 (-0.55%)
     
  • Bitcoin USD

    69,408.98
    -544.31 (-0.78%)
     
  • CMC Crypto 200

    1,509.06
    -17.36 (-1.14%)
     
  • S&P 500

    5,307.01
    -14.40 (-0.27%)
     
  • Dow

    39,671.04
    -201.95 (-0.51%)
     
  • Nasdaq

    16,801.54
    -31.08 (-0.18%)
     
  • Gold

    2,373.60
    -19.30 (-0.81%)
     
  • Crude Oil

    77.14
    -0.43 (-0.55%)
     
  • 10-Yr Bond

    4.4340
    +0.0200 (+0.45%)
     
  • FTSE Bursa Malaysia

    1,629.01
    +6.92 (+0.43%)
     
  • Jakarta Composite Index

    7,222.38
    +36.34 (+0.51%)
     
  • PSE Index

    6,629.43
    +22.21 (+0.34%)
     

Owning 39% shares,institutional owners seem interested in Whole Earth Brands, Inc. (NASDAQ:FREE),

Key Insights

  • Institutions' substantial holdings in Whole Earth Brands implies that they have significant influence over the company's share price

  • The top 7 shareholders own 53% of the company

  • Insiders own 34% of Whole Earth Brands

If you want to know who really controls Whole Earth Brands, Inc. (NASDAQ:FREE), then you'll have to look at the makeup of its share registry. We can see that institutions own the lion's share in the company with 39% ownership. In other words, the group stands to gain the most (or lose the most) from their investment into the company.

Since institutional have access to huge amounts of capital, their market moves tend to receive a lot of scrutiny by retail or individual investors. Therefore, a good portion of institutional money invested in the company is usually a huge vote of confidence on its future.

ADVERTISEMENT

Let's take a closer look to see what the different types of shareholders can tell us about Whole Earth Brands.

Check out our latest analysis for Whole Earth Brands

ownership-breakdown
ownership-breakdown

What Does The Institutional Ownership Tell Us About Whole Earth Brands?

Institutions typically measure themselves against a benchmark when reporting to their own investors, so they often become more enthusiastic about a stock once it's included in a major index. We would expect most companies to have some institutions on the register, especially if they are growing.

As you can see, institutional investors have a fair amount of stake in Whole Earth Brands. This implies the analysts working for those institutions have looked at the stock and they like it. But just like anyone else, they could be wrong. It is not uncommon to see a big share price drop if two large institutional investors try to sell out of a stock at the same time. So it is worth checking the past earnings trajectory of Whole Earth Brands, (below). Of course, keep in mind that there are other factors to consider, too.

earnings-and-revenue-growth
earnings-and-revenue-growth

Our data indicates that hedge funds own 12% of Whole Earth Brands. That worth noting, since hedge funds are often quite active investors, who may try to influence management. Many want to see value creation (and a higher share price) in the short term or medium term. Looking at our data, we can see that the largest shareholder is Martin Franklin with 21% of shares outstanding. With 7.6% and 7.3% of the shares outstanding respectively, Hilary Shane and Beryl Capital Management LLC are the second and third largest shareholders.

On further inspection, we found that more than half the company's shares are owned by the top 7 shareholders, suggesting that the interests of the larger shareholders are balanced out to an extent by the smaller ones.

While it makes sense to study institutional ownership data for a company, it also makes sense to study analyst sentiments to know which way the wind is blowing. While there is some analyst coverage, the company is probably not widely covered. So it could gain more attention, down the track.

Insider Ownership Of Whole Earth Brands

The definition of an insider can differ slightly between different countries, but members of the board of directors always count. The company management answer to the board and the latter should represent the interests of shareholders. Notably, sometimes top-level managers are on the board themselves.

I generally consider insider ownership to be a good thing. However, on some occasions it makes it more difficult for other shareholders to hold the board accountable for decisions.

Our most recent data indicates that insiders own a reasonable proportion of Whole Earth Brands, Inc.. It has a market capitalization of just US$207m, and insiders have US$70m worth of shares in their own names. We would say this shows alignment with shareholders, but it is worth noting that the company is still quite small; some insiders may have founded the business. You can click here to see if those insiders have been buying or selling.

General Public Ownership

With a 11% ownership, the general public, mostly comprising of individual investors, have some degree of sway over Whole Earth Brands. While this group can't necessarily call the shots, it can certainly have a real influence on how the company is run.

Public Company Ownership

We can see that public companies hold 3.7% of the Whole Earth Brands shares on issue. It's hard to say for sure but this suggests they have entwined business interests. This might be a strategic stake, so it's worth watching this space for changes in ownership.

Next Steps:

I find it very interesting to look at who exactly owns a company. But to truly gain insight, we need to consider other information, too. Like risks, for instance. Every company has them, and we've spotted 2 warning signs for Whole Earth Brands (of which 1 is a bit unpleasant!) you should know about.

If you are like me, you may want to think about whether this company will grow or shrink. Luckily, you can check this free report showing analyst forecasts for its future.

NB: Figures in this article are calculated using data from the last twelve months, which refer to the 12-month period ending on the last date of the month the financial statement is dated. This may not be consistent with full year annual report figures.

Have feedback on this article? Concerned about the content? Get in touch with us directly. Alternatively, email editorial-team (at) simplywallst.com.

This article by Simply Wall St is general in nature. We provide commentary based on historical data and analyst forecasts only using an unbiased methodology and our articles are not intended to be financial advice. It does not constitute a recommendation to buy or sell any stock, and does not take account of your objectives, or your financial situation. We aim to bring you long-term focused analysis driven by fundamental data. Note that our analysis may not factor in the latest price-sensitive company announcements or qualitative material. Simply Wall St has no position in any stocks mentioned.