NBA lawyer: Legal sports betting in America is 'the best place to end up'

Update: On May 14, the Supreme Court struck down the Professional and Amateur Sports Protection Act — effectively legalizing sports betting across the U.S.

On Dec. 4, the U.S. Supreme Court will at last hear the case of Christie et al vs. NCAA et al, which has been awaiting its day in the nation’s top court for six years.

What’s at stake in the case: New Jersey (led by outgoing Gov. Chris Christie) wants to legalize sports betting in the state, and if it wins the right to do so, other states are likely to follow suit in a rapid domino effect.

After SCOTUS hears the NJ case, regardless of the outcome, the NBA has big plans to lobby Congress for federal change and regulation to betting law, a high-ranking NBA lawyer revealed on a panel this week, moderated by Yahoo Finance, at the Sports Betting USA Conference in New York. This is something the NBA had not previously said until now.

“Our general position on sports betting is that it should be legal and regulated, pursuant to a federal framework that has minimum safeguards,” said NBA VP and assistant general counsel Dan Spillane. “We have advisors in DC, we have legislation that we’ve been pulling together, talking with other stakeholders in this area. It’s a slow process… When the leagues were all just unanimously opposed to it, it really wasn’t, I think, a practical discussion to have, and now it is… I think that there will be a little bit more clarity, and people will be more open, especially members of Congress, to talking about potential legislation once the [NJ] case is resolved one way or another.”

Why the leagues oppose the NJ case

Even though the NBA and most of the other leagues have indicated (or their commissioners have) that they do support legalized sports betting in America, the NCAA, NFL, NBA, MLB, and NHL all oppose New Jersey’s case, and sued to stop the state from passing its new law.

The reason the leagues are doing this has some nuance to it that bears explaining. But they want the change to be made at the federal level: they want the repeal of PASPA (Professional and Amateur Sports Protection Act), the 1992 federal law that banned sports betting everywhere in America but Nevada.

What they don’t want is for sports betting law to vary from state to state, which is what the landscape would look like, at least for a while, if New Jersey wins. That would be a mess, from the leagues’ perspective, to regulate and monitor: imagine if you could now place a legal bet on NBA games in states other than Nevada, but not in all states. (This is the current landscape the legal cannabis industry is dealing with, where eight states have legalized recreational marijuana, but it’s still illegal at the federal level.)