Advertisement
Singapore markets closed
  • Straits Times Index

    3,301.78
    +4.23 (+0.13%)
     
  • S&P 500

    5,483.29
    +10.06 (+0.18%)
     
  • Dow

    38,805.23
    +27.13 (+0.07%)
     
  • Nasdaq

    17,870.46
    +13.44 (+0.08%)
     
  • Bitcoin USD

    64,412.61
    -900.33 (-1.38%)
     
  • CMC Crypto 200

    1,346.70
    -42.71 (-3.07%)
     
  • FTSE 100

    8,197.17
    +55.02 (+0.68%)
     
  • Gold

    2,340.90
    +11.90 (+0.51%)
     
  • Crude Oil

    81.08
    +0.75 (+0.93%)
     
  • 10-Yr Bond

    4.2480
    -0.0310 (-0.72%)
     
  • Nikkei

    38,482.11
    +379.67 (+1.00%)
     
  • Hang Seng

    17,915.55
    -20.57 (-0.11%)
     
  • FTSE Bursa Malaysia

    1,606.13
    -1.19 (-0.07%)
     
  • Jakarta Composite Index

    6,734.83
    -96.73 (-1.42%)
     
  • PSE Index

    6,368.80
    -14.90 (-0.23%)
     

Here's Why Intel (NASDAQ:INTC) Has A Meaningful Debt Burden

Some say volatility, rather than debt, is the best way to think about risk as an investor, but Warren Buffett famously said that 'Volatility is far from synonymous with risk.' So it seems the smart money knows that debt - which is usually involved in bankruptcies - is a very important factor, when you assess how risky a company is. Importantly, Intel Corporation (NASDAQ:INTC) does carry debt. But the real question is whether this debt is making the company risky.

Why Does Debt Bring Risk?

Debt is a tool to help businesses grow, but if a business is incapable of paying off its lenders, then it exists at their mercy. Ultimately, if the company can't fulfill its legal obligations to repay debt, shareholders could walk away with nothing. However, a more usual (but still expensive) situation is where a company must dilute shareholders at a cheap share price simply to get debt under control. Of course, debt can be an important tool in businesses, particularly capital heavy businesses. The first step when considering a company's debt levels is to consider its cash and debt together.

See our latest analysis for Intel

How Much Debt Does Intel Carry?

You can click the graphic below for the historical numbers, but it shows that as of March 2024 Intel had US$52.5b of debt, an increase on US$50.3b, over one year. However, it also had US$21.3b in cash, and so its net debt is US$31.1b.

debt-equity-history-analysis
debt-equity-history-analysis

A Look At Intel's Liabilities

Zooming in on the latest balance sheet data, we can see that Intel had liabilities of US$27.2b due within 12 months and liabilities of US$54.8b due beyond that. On the other hand, it had cash of US$21.3b and US$5.47b worth of receivables due within a year. So its liabilities outweigh the sum of its cash and (near-term) receivables by US$55.2b.

ADVERTISEMENT

This deficit isn't so bad because Intel is worth a massive US$131.6b, and thus could probably raise enough capital to shore up its balance sheet, if the need arose. But it's clear that we should definitely closely examine whether it can manage its debt without dilution.

We use two main ratios to inform us about debt levels relative to earnings. The first is net debt divided by earnings before interest, tax, depreciation, and amortization (EBITDA), while the second is how many times its earnings before interest and tax (EBIT) covers its interest expense (or its interest cover, for short). This way, we consider both the absolute quantum of the debt, as well as the interest rates paid on it.

Intel has a debt to EBITDA ratio of 3.0, which signals significant debt, but is still pretty reasonable for most types of business. However, its interest coverage of 1k is very high, suggesting that the interest expense on the debt is currently quite low. We also note that Intel improved its EBIT from a last year's loss to a positive US$714m. The balance sheet is clearly the area to focus on when you are analysing debt. But it is future earnings, more than anything, that will determine Intel's ability to maintain a healthy balance sheet going forward. So if you're focused on the future you can check out this free report showing analyst profit forecasts.

But our final consideration is also important, because a company cannot pay debt with paper profits; it needs cold hard cash. So it is important to check how much of its earnings before interest and tax (EBIT) converts to actual free cash flow. Over the last year, Intel saw substantial negative free cash flow, in total. While that may be a result of expenditure for growth, it does make the debt far more risky.

Our View

Neither Intel's ability to convert EBIT to free cash flow nor its net debt to EBITDA gave us confidence in its ability to take on more debt. But the good news is it seems to be able to cover its interest expense with its EBIT with ease. Taking the abovementioned factors together we do think Intel's debt poses some risks to the business. While that debt can boost returns, we think the company has enough leverage now. The balance sheet is clearly the area to focus on when you are analysing debt. However, not all investment risk resides within the balance sheet - far from it. For example, we've discovered 2 warning signs for Intel that you should be aware of before investing here.

If, after all that, you're more interested in a fast growing company with a rock-solid balance sheet, then check out our list of net cash growth stocks without delay.

Have feedback on this article? Concerned about the content? Get in touch with us directly. Alternatively, email editorial-team (at) simplywallst.com.

This article by Simply Wall St is general in nature. We provide commentary based on historical data and analyst forecasts only using an unbiased methodology and our articles are not intended to be financial advice. It does not constitute a recommendation to buy or sell any stock, and does not take account of your objectives, or your financial situation. We aim to bring you long-term focused analysis driven by fundamental data. Note that our analysis may not factor in the latest price-sensitive company announcements or qualitative material. Simply Wall St has no position in any stocks mentioned.