Singapore markets closed
  • Straits Times Index

    3,155.16
    -11.78 (-0.37%)
     
  • S&P 500

    4,395.26
    -23.89 (-0.54%)
     
  • Dow

    34,935.47
    -149.03 (-0.42%)
     
  • Nasdaq

    14,672.68
    -105.62 (-0.71%)
     
  • BTC-USD

    39,542.80
    -2,351.87 (-5.61%)
     
  • CMC Crypto 200

    962.96
    +13.06 (+1.37%)
     
  • FTSE 100

    7,100.50
    +68.20 (+0.97%)
     
  • Gold

    1,810.10
    -7.10 (-0.39%)
     
  • Crude Oil

    73.10
    -0.85 (-1.15%)
     
  • 10-Yr Bond

    1.2390
    0.0000 (0.00%)
     
  • Nikkei

    27,781.02
    +497.43 (+1.82%)
     
  • Hang Seng

    26,235.80
    +274.77 (+1.06%)
     
  • FTSE Bursa Malaysia

    1,493.00
    -1.60 (-0.11%)
     
  • Jakarta Composite Index

    6,096.54
    +26.50 (+0.44%)
     
  • PSE Index

    6,446.31
    +176.08 (+2.81%)
     

Factbox-Europe's fight to make farming subsidies 'green'

·3-min read

By Kate Abnett

BRUSSELS (Reuters) - European Union negotiators were attempting to clinch a deal on Friday to reform the bloc's huge farming subsidy programme, to make it greener and support smaller farms.

The Common Agricultural Policy (CAP), worth around a third of the EU's 2021-2027 budget, will spend 387 billion euros ($474 billion) on payments to farmers and support for rural development. The new rules will apply from 2023.

Farming accounts for 10% of EU greenhouse gas emissions, but the 27 EU member states and the European Parliament have been squabbling for three years on what to do about it.

Roughly 80% of CAP payments go to 20% of the beneficiaries, mostly big landowners and agro-industrial firms, and the reform is also intended to route more money to smaller farms.

Here are the key issues:

ECO-SCHEMES, GREEN STANDARDS

The new CAP would require countries to spend 20% of payments to farmers from 2023-2024, and 25% between 2025-2027, on "eco-schemes" that protect the environment, according to a draft agreement seen by Reuters on Friday.

Any funds below those limits that are not spent on eco-schemes must be spent on green measures in other areas. Eco-schemes could, for instance, mean restoring wetlands to absorb CO2, or organic farming.

Parliament had wanted a 30% share, while member states' starting point was 20%.

All payments would be tied to minimum environmental rules, such as farmers setting aside at least 4% of arable land for areas where nature can thrive, or rotating crops annually to boost soil health.

Some EU lawmakers said the rules contained big loopholes. Campaigners said the deal lacked a clear definition of an "eco-scheme", thus failing to ensure that money would not go to more polluting farming practices.

NATIONAL PLANS

Each country must submit a plan for spending its share of the CAP to the European Commission, which will assess whether it meets legally-binding EU targets.

These could include the bloc's aim to cut net greenhouse gas emissions 55% from 1990 levels by 2030, but are unlikely to include targets that are not yet legally binding, such as halving the use of chemical pesticides by 2030.

SMALLER FARMS

A major goal is to stop the decline of Europe's small farms.

The draft agreement would oblige each EU country to redistribute a minimum 10% of payments to farmers to smaller farms.

Countries could dodge this requirement if they use other methods to distribute the funds fairly - something member states had pushed for in the talks.

Parliament had pushed, unsuccessfully, for an annual cap of 100,000 euros per beneficiary.

WHO COUNTS AS A FARMER?

The new CAP will limit who is defined as an "active farmer" and can receive subsidies - another attempt to stop large businesses and landowners sucking up money.

Parliament had sought a definition that would exclude large-scale processors of agricultural products, and stop funds going to non-agricultural businesses such as waterworks or railway services.

Negotiators are also considering a requirement for countries to hand roughly 3% of farm payments to young farmers, to help attract new talent.

Also under discussion are standards for working conditions in farming and a crisis fund in case agricultural markets are disrupted by an emergency such as a pandemic.

($1 = 0.8173 euros)

(Reporting by Kate Abnett; Editing by Kevin Liffey)

Our goal is to create a safe and engaging place for users to connect over interests and passions. In order to improve our community experience, we are temporarily suspending article commenting