Advertisement
Singapore markets close in 5 hours 43 minutes
  • Straits Times Index

    3,276.19
    -11.56 (-0.35%)
     
  • Nikkei

    37,780.35
    +151.87 (+0.40%)
     
  • Hang Seng

    17,601.26
    +316.72 (+1.83%)
     
  • FTSE 100

    8,078.86
    +38.48 (+0.48%)
     
  • Bitcoin USD

    64,411.48
    +270.68 (+0.42%)
     
  • CMC Crypto 200

    1,392.59
    +10.02 (+0.72%)
     
  • S&P 500

    5,048.42
    -23.21 (-0.46%)
     
  • Dow

    38,085.80
    -375.12 (-0.98%)
     
  • Nasdaq

    15,611.76
    -100.99 (-0.64%)
     
  • Gold

    2,346.20
    +3.70 (+0.16%)
     
  • Crude Oil

    83.83
    +0.26 (+0.31%)
     
  • 10-Yr Bond

    4.7060
    +0.0540 (+1.16%)
     
  • FTSE Bursa Malaysia

    1,572.84
    +3.59 (+0.23%)
     
  • Jakarta Composite Index

    7,116.50
    -38.79 (-0.54%)
     
  • PSE Index

    6,550.29
    -24.59 (-0.37%)
     

Dogfighting in an F-35 is 'like having a knife fight in a telephone booth'

f35a
f35a

(If you're dogfighting in an F-35, "somebody made a mistake," Rahill said.US Air Force photo)

Civilian pilot Adam Alpert of the Vermont Air National Guard wrote an interesting and enjoyable article on his training experience with the vaunted F-35 in a mock mission to take out nuclear facilities in North Korea.

Chief among the interesting points in the article is a quote from Alpert's instructor pilot, Lt. Col. John Rahill, about the F-35's dogfighting ability.

Speaking about the nuanced technical and tactical differences between the F-35, the future plane of the VANG, and the F-16, the VANG's current plane, Rahill said this:

ADVERTISEMENT

"If you get into a dogfight with the F-35, somebody made a mistake. It's like having a knife fight in a telephone booth — very unpredictable."

The F-35 has been criticized for its dogfighting abilities. But as more information comes to light about the F-35's mission and purpose, it becomes clearer that measuring the F-35 by its ability to dogfight doesn't make much more sense than measuring a rifle by its capability as a melee weapon.

"The pilot uses onboard long-range sensors and weapons to destroy the enemy aircraft before ever being seen. The combination of stealth and superior electronic warfare systems makes the F-35 both more lethal and safer," said Rahill, according to Alpert.

In Alpert's mock mission to North Korea, planners sent only four planes, two F-35s and two F-22s, instead of the older formation of F-18s for electronic attacks, F-15s for air dominance, F-16s for bombing, and airborne early warning radar planes. Altogether, the older formation totals about 75 lives at risk versus four pilots at risk with the F-35 version.

f35 and f16
f35 and f16

(Mission planners could risk four airmen in fifth-generation planes or up to 75 in legacy aircraft when embarking on dangerous missions.US Air Force)

Alpert's piece highlights many of the ways in which the F-35 outclasses the F-16 with an easier, more intuitive interface that allows pilots to focus more on the mission and less on the machine. In fact, Alpert compares the F-35's controls to an "elaborate video game" with a variety of apps he can call up seamlessly to access any relevant information — including an indicator that tells him how stealthy he is.

Read the full article by Alpert at SevenDaysVT.com »

NOW WATCH: The F-35 has hit another snag — this time because it’s too stealthy



More From Business Insider