Advertisement
Singapore markets closed
  • Straits Times Index

    3,314.14
    +8.12 (+0.25%)
     
  • S&P 500

    5,464.62
    -8.55 (-0.16%)
     
  • Dow

    39,150.33
    +15.53 (+0.04%)
     
  • Nasdaq

    17,689.36
    -32.24 (-0.18%)
     
  • Bitcoin USD

    61,016.34
    -3,309.09 (-5.14%)
     
  • CMC Crypto 200

    1,262.97
    -46.75 (-3.57%)
     
  • FTSE 100

    8,281.08
    +43.36 (+0.53%)
     
  • Gold

    2,339.90
    +8.70 (+0.37%)
     
  • Crude Oil

    80.70
    -0.03 (-0.04%)
     
  • 10-Yr Bond

    4.2670
    +0.0100 (+0.23%)
     
  • Nikkei

    38,804.65
    +208.18 (+0.54%)
     
  • Hang Seng

    18,027.71
    -0.81 (-0.00%)
     
  • FTSE Bursa Malaysia

    1,589.66
    -0.71 (-0.04%)
     
  • Jakarta Composite Index

    6,889.17
    +9.19 (+0.13%)
     
  • PSE Index

    6,272.46
    +113.98 (+1.85%)
     

Braemar Plc (LON:BMS) is definitely on the radar of institutional investors who own 42% of the company

Key Insights

  • Given the large stake in the stock by institutions, Braemar's stock price might be vulnerable to their trading decisions

  • A total of 23 investors have a majority stake in the company with 50% ownership

  • Using data from analyst forecasts alongside ownership research, one can better assess the future performance of a company

To get a sense of who is truly in control of Braemar Plc (LON:BMS), it is important to understand the ownership structure of the business. The group holding the most number of shares in the company, around 42% to be precise, is institutions. That is, the group stands to benefit the most if the stock rises (or lose the most if there is a downturn).

Given the vast amount of money and research capacities at their disposal, institutional ownership tends to carry a lot of weight, especially with individual investors. Hence, having a considerable amount of institutional money invested in a company is often regarded as a desirable trait.

ADVERTISEMENT

Let's take a closer look to see what the different types of shareholders can tell us about Braemar.

View our latest analysis for Braemar

ownership-breakdown
ownership-breakdown

What Does The Institutional Ownership Tell Us About Braemar?

Many institutions measure their performance against an index that approximates the local market. So they usually pay more attention to companies that are included in major indices.

As you can see, institutional investors have a fair amount of stake in Braemar. This implies the analysts working for those institutions have looked at the stock and they like it. But just like anyone else, they could be wrong. It is not uncommon to see a big share price drop if two large institutional investors try to sell out of a stock at the same time. So it is worth checking the past earnings trajectory of Braemar, (below). Of course, keep in mind that there are other factors to consider, too.

earnings-and-revenue-growth
earnings-and-revenue-growth

Braemar is not owned by hedge funds. Our data shows that Braemar Shipping Services Plc, ESOP is the largest shareholder with 7.7% of shares outstanding. For context, the second largest shareholder holds about 5.2% of the shares outstanding, followed by an ownership of 4.4% by the third-largest shareholder. Additionally, the company's CEO James Christopher Gundy directly holds 2.5% of the total shares outstanding.

Looking at the shareholder registry, we can see that 50% of the ownership is controlled by the top 23 shareholders, meaning that no single shareholder has a majority interest in the ownership.

Researching institutional ownership is a good way to gauge and filter a stock's expected performance. The same can be achieved by studying analyst sentiments. There are a reasonable number of analysts covering the stock, so it might be useful to find out their aggregate view on the future.

Insider Ownership Of Braemar

While the precise definition of an insider can be subjective, almost everyone considers board members to be insiders. The company management answer to the board and the latter should represent the interests of shareholders. Notably, sometimes top-level managers are on the board themselves.

Most consider insider ownership a positive because it can indicate the board is well aligned with other shareholders. However, on some occasions too much power is concentrated within this group.

We can report that insiders do own shares in Braemar Plc. It has a market capitalization of just UK£87m, and insiders have UK£7.0m worth of shares, in their own names. This shows at least some alignment, but we usually like to see larger insider holdings. You can click here to see if those insiders have been buying or selling.

General Public Ownership

With a 37% ownership, the general public, mostly comprising of individual investors, have some degree of sway over Braemar. While this group can't necessarily call the shots, it can certainly have a real influence on how the company is run.

Private Company Ownership

Our data indicates that Private Companies hold 4.3%, of the company's shares. It's hard to draw any conclusions from this fact alone, so its worth looking into who owns those private companies. Sometimes insiders or other related parties have an interest in shares in a public company through a separate private company.

Next Steps:

It's always worth thinking about the different groups who own shares in a company. But to understand Braemar better, we need to consider many other factors. Case in point: We've spotted 3 warning signs for Braemar you should be aware of.

Ultimately the future is most important. You can access this free report on analyst forecasts for the company.

NB: Figures in this article are calculated using data from the last twelve months, which refer to the 12-month period ending on the last date of the month the financial statement is dated. This may not be consistent with full year annual report figures.

Have feedback on this article? Concerned about the content? Get in touch with us directly. Alternatively, email editorial-team (at) simplywallst.com.

This article by Simply Wall St is general in nature. We provide commentary based on historical data and analyst forecasts only using an unbiased methodology and our articles are not intended to be financial advice. It does not constitute a recommendation to buy or sell any stock, and does not take account of your objectives, or your financial situation. We aim to bring you long-term focused analysis driven by fundamental data. Note that our analysis may not factor in the latest price-sensitive company announcements or qualitative material. Simply Wall St has no position in any stocks mentioned.

Have feedback on this article? Concerned about the content? Get in touch with us directly. Alternatively, email editorial-team@simplywallst.com