Advertisement
Singapore markets closed
  • Straits Times Index

    3,322.62
    +14.72 (+0.45%)
     
  • S&P 500

    5,319.53
    +12.52 (+0.24%)
     
  • Dow

    39,404.10
    -266.94 (-0.67%)
     
  • Nasdaq

    16,936.16
    +134.62 (+0.80%)
     
  • Bitcoin USD

    68,154.95
    -2,107.90 (-3.00%)
     
  • CMC Crypto 200

    1,476.92
    -25.74 (-1.71%)
     
  • FTSE 100

    8,343.18
    -27.15 (-0.32%)
     
  • Gold

    2,345.30
    -47.60 (-1.99%)
     
  • Crude Oil

    77.03
    -0.54 (-0.70%)
     
  • 10-Yr Bond

    4.4950
    +0.0610 (+1.38%)
     
  • Nikkei

    39,103.22
    +486.12 (+1.26%)
     
  • Hang Seng

    18,868.71
    -326.89 (-1.70%)
     
  • FTSE Bursa Malaysia

    1,629.18
    +7.09 (+0.44%)
     
  • Jakarta Composite Index

    7,222.38
    +36.34 (+0.51%)
     
  • PSE Index

    6,659.99
    +52.77 (+0.80%)
     

With 85% institutional ownership, Air Products and Chemicals, Inc. (NYSE:APD) is a favorite amongst the big guns

Key Insights

  • Institutions' substantial holdings in Air Products and Chemicals implies that they have significant influence over the company's share price

  • 50% of the business is held by the top 19 shareholders

  • Ownership research along with analyst forecasts data help provide a good understanding of opportunities in a stock

To get a sense of who is truly in control of Air Products and Chemicals, Inc. (NYSE:APD), it is important to understand the ownership structure of the business. And the group that holds the biggest piece of the pie are institutions with 85% ownership. In other words, the group stands to gain the most (or lose the most) from their investment into the company.

Since institutional have access to huge amounts of capital, their market moves tend to receive a lot of scrutiny by retail or individual investors. Therefore, a good portion of institutional money invested in the company is usually a huge vote of confidence on its future.

ADVERTISEMENT

In the chart below, we zoom in on the different ownership groups of Air Products and Chemicals.

See our latest analysis for Air Products and Chemicals

ownership-breakdown
ownership-breakdown

What Does The Institutional Ownership Tell Us About Air Products and Chemicals?

Institutional investors commonly compare their own returns to the returns of a commonly followed index. So they generally do consider buying larger companies that are included in the relevant benchmark index.

Air Products and Chemicals already has institutions on the share registry. Indeed, they own a respectable stake in the company. This suggests some credibility amongst professional investors. But we can't rely on that fact alone since institutions make bad investments sometimes, just like everyone does. If multiple institutions change their view on a stock at the same time, you could see the share price drop fast. It's therefore worth looking at Air Products and Chemicals' earnings history below. Of course, the future is what really matters.

earnings-and-revenue-growth
earnings-and-revenue-growth

Since institutional investors own more than half the issued stock, the board will likely have to pay attention to their preferences. We note that hedge funds don't have a meaningful investment in Air Products and Chemicals. Our data shows that The Vanguard Group, Inc. is the largest shareholder with 9.4% of shares outstanding. BlackRock, Inc. is the second largest shareholder owning 6.8% of common stock, and State Farm Insurance Companies, Asset Management Arm holds about 5.5% of the company stock.

After doing some more digging, we found that the top 19 have the combined ownership of 50% in the company, suggesting that no single shareholder has significant control over the company.

Researching institutional ownership is a good way to gauge and filter a stock's expected performance. The same can be achieved by studying analyst sentiments. There are plenty of analysts covering the stock, so it might be worth seeing what they are forecasting, too.

Insider Ownership Of Air Products and Chemicals

While the precise definition of an insider can be subjective, almost everyone considers board members to be insiders. Company management run the business, but the CEO will answer to the board, even if he or she is a member of it.

Insider ownership is positive when it signals leadership are thinking like the true owners of the company. However, high insider ownership can also give immense power to a small group within the company. This can be negative in some circumstances.

Our data suggests that insiders own under 1% of Air Products and Chemicals, Inc. in their own names. It is a very large company, so it would be surprising to see insiders own a large proportion of the company. Though their holding amounts to less than 1%, we can see that board members collectively own US$191m worth of shares (at current prices). It is always good to see at least some insider ownership, but it might be worth checking if those insiders have been selling.

General Public Ownership

The general public, who are usually individual investors, hold a 14% stake in Air Products and Chemicals. While this size of ownership may not be enough to sway a policy decision in their favour, they can still make a collective impact on company policies.

Next Steps:

While it is well worth considering the different groups that own a company, there are other factors that are even more important. Like risks, for instance. Every company has them, and we've spotted 3 warning signs for Air Products and Chemicals (of which 1 is significant!) you should know about.

But ultimately it is the future, not the past, that will determine how well the owners of this business will do. Therefore we think it advisable to take a look at this free report showing whether analysts are predicting a brighter future.

NB: Figures in this article are calculated using data from the last twelve months, which refer to the 12-month period ending on the last date of the month the financial statement is dated. This may not be consistent with full year annual report figures.

Have feedback on this article? Concerned about the content? Get in touch with us directly. Alternatively, email editorial-team (at) simplywallst.com.

This article by Simply Wall St is general in nature. We provide commentary based on historical data and analyst forecasts only using an unbiased methodology and our articles are not intended to be financial advice. It does not constitute a recommendation to buy or sell any stock, and does not take account of your objectives, or your financial situation. We aim to bring you long-term focused analysis driven by fundamental data. Note that our analysis may not factor in the latest price-sensitive company announcements or qualitative material. Simply Wall St has no position in any stocks mentioned.