Advertisement
Singapore markets closed
  • Straits Times Index

    3,296.89
    +4.20 (+0.13%)
     
  • S&P 500

    5,018.39
    -17.30 (-0.34%)
     
  • Dow

    37,903.29
    +87.37 (+0.23%)
     
  • Nasdaq

    15,605.48
    -52.34 (-0.33%)
     
  • Bitcoin USD

    58,288.46
    +768.63 (+1.34%)
     
  • CMC Crypto 200

    1,259.42
    -11.33 (-0.89%)
     
  • FTSE 100

    8,155.27
    +34.03 (+0.42%)
     
  • Gold

    2,309.10
    -1.90 (-0.08%)
     
  • Crude Oil

    79.41
    +0.41 (+0.52%)
     
  • 10-Yr Bond

    4.5950
    -0.0910 (-1.94%)
     
  • Nikkei

    38,236.07
    -37.98 (-0.10%)
     
  • Hang Seng

    18,207.13
    +444.10 (+2.50%)
     
  • FTSE Bursa Malaysia

    1,580.30
    +4.33 (+0.27%)
     
  • Jakarta Composite Index

    7,117.42
    -116.77 (-1.61%)
     
  • PSE Index

    6,646.55
    -53.94 (-0.81%)
     

With 40% stake, Bursa Malaysia Berhad (KLSE:BURSA) seems to have captured institutional investors' interest

Key Insights

  • Significantly high institutional ownership implies Bursa Malaysia Berhad's stock price is sensitive to their trading actions

  • A total of 6 investors have a majority stake in the company with 51% ownership

  • Using data from analyst forecasts alongside ownership research, one can better assess the future performance of a company

A look at the shareholders of Bursa Malaysia Berhad (KLSE:BURSA) can tell us which group is most powerful. And the group that holds the biggest piece of the pie are institutions with 40% ownership. Put another way, the group faces the maximum upside potential (or downside risk).

Because institutional owners have a huge pool of resources and liquidity, their investing decisions tend to carry a great deal of weight, especially with individual investors. As a result, a sizeable amount of institutional money invested in a firm is generally viewed as a positive attribute.

ADVERTISEMENT

In the chart below, we zoom in on the different ownership groups of Bursa Malaysia Berhad.

Check out our latest analysis for Bursa Malaysia Berhad

ownership-breakdown
ownership-breakdown

What Does The Institutional Ownership Tell Us About Bursa Malaysia Berhad?

Many institutions measure their performance against an index that approximates the local market. So they usually pay more attention to companies that are included in major indices.

We can see that Bursa Malaysia Berhad does have institutional investors; and they hold a good portion of the company's stock. This suggests some credibility amongst professional investors. But we can't rely on that fact alone since institutions make bad investments sometimes, just like everyone does. When multiple institutions own a stock, there's always a risk that they are in a 'crowded trade'. When such a trade goes wrong, multiple parties may compete to sell stock fast. This risk is higher in a company without a history of growth. You can see Bursa Malaysia Berhad's historic earnings and revenue below, but keep in mind there's always more to the story.

earnings-and-revenue-growth
earnings-and-revenue-growth

We note that hedge funds don't have a meaningful investment in Bursa Malaysia Berhad. The company's largest shareholder is Capital Market Development Fund, with ownership of 19%. Employees Provident Fund of Malaysia is the second largest shareholder owning 13% of common stock, and Kumpulan Wang Persaraan holds about 11% of the company stock.

We did some more digging and found that 6 of the top shareholders account for roughly 51% of the register, implying that along with larger shareholders, there are a few smaller shareholders, thereby balancing out each others interests somewhat.

While studying institutional ownership for a company can add value to your research, it is also a good practice to research analyst recommendations to get a deeper understand of a stock's expected performance. Quite a few analysts cover the stock, so you could look into forecast growth quite easily.

Insider Ownership Of Bursa Malaysia Berhad

The definition of an insider can differ slightly between different countries, but members of the board of directors always count. Company management run the business, but the CEO will answer to the board, even if he or she is a member of it.

Insider ownership is positive when it signals leadership are thinking like the true owners of the company. However, high insider ownership can also give immense power to a small group within the company. This can be negative in some circumstances.

Our information suggests that Bursa Malaysia Berhad insiders own under 1% of the company. We do note, however, it is possible insiders have an indirect interest through a private company or other corporate structure. Keep in mind that it's a big company, and the insiders own RM22m worth of shares. The absolute value might be more important than the proportional share. It is always good to see at least some insider ownership, but it might be worth checking if those insiders have been selling.

General Public Ownership

The general public-- including retail investors -- own 39% stake in the company, and hence can't easily be ignored. This size of ownership, while considerable, may not be enough to change company policy if the decision is not in sync with other large shareholders.

Private Company Ownership

It seems that Private Companies own 19%, of the Bursa Malaysia Berhad stock. It might be worth looking deeper into this. If related parties, such as insiders, have an interest in one of these private companies, that should be disclosed in the annual report. Private companies may also have a strategic interest in the company.

Next Steps:

While it is well worth considering the different groups that own a company, there are other factors that are even more important. Consider for instance, the ever-present spectre of investment risk. We've identified 2 warning signs with Bursa Malaysia Berhad , and understanding them should be part of your investment process.

Ultimately the future is most important. You can access this free report on analyst forecasts for the company.

NB: Figures in this article are calculated using data from the last twelve months, which refer to the 12-month period ending on the last date of the month the financial statement is dated. This may not be consistent with full year annual report figures.

Have feedback on this article? Concerned about the content? Get in touch with us directly. Alternatively, email editorial-team (at) simplywallst.com.

This article by Simply Wall St is general in nature. We provide commentary based on historical data and analyst forecasts only using an unbiased methodology and our articles are not intended to be financial advice. It does not constitute a recommendation to buy or sell any stock, and does not take account of your objectives, or your financial situation. We aim to bring you long-term focused analysis driven by fundamental data. Note that our analysis may not factor in the latest price-sensitive company announcements or qualitative material. Simply Wall St has no position in any stocks mentioned.