Advertisement
Singapore markets closed
  • Straits Times Index

    3,313.48
    +8.49 (+0.26%)
     
  • Nikkei

    38,787.38
    -132.88 (-0.34%)
     
  • Hang Seng

    19,553.61
    +177.08 (+0.91%)
     
  • FTSE 100

    8,424.09
    -14.56 (-0.17%)
     
  • Bitcoin USD

    66,103.72
    -238.34 (-0.36%)
     
  • CMC Crypto 200

    1,350.17
    -23.67 (-1.72%)
     
  • S&P 500

    5,296.49
    -0.61 (-0.01%)
     
  • Dow

    39,907.29
    +37.91 (+0.10%)
     
  • Nasdaq

    16,687.28
    -11.04 (-0.07%)
     
  • Gold

    2,404.70
    +19.20 (+0.80%)
     
  • Crude Oil

    79.57
    +0.34 (+0.43%)
     
  • 10-Yr Bond

    4.4040
    +0.0270 (+0.62%)
     
  • FTSE Bursa Malaysia

    1,616.62
    +5.51 (+0.34%)
     
  • Jakarta Composite Index

    7,317.24
    +70.54 (+0.97%)
     
  • PSE Index

    6,618.69
    -9.51 (-0.14%)
     

CE-Oh no he didn't!: Anssi Vanjoki says using Android is like peeing in your pants for warmth

You've been asking and imploring, so Anssi Vanjoki -- straight shooter, that he is -- now has an answer. Why doesn't Nokia switch to Android? Because Google's software represents only a short-term solution that will lead to bigger quandaries down the line, says he. Anssi was even graceful enough to illustrate this point with a vivid example, saying that mobile manufacturers who go the Android route are doing no better than Finnish boys who "pee in their pants" for warmth in the winter. Yeah. We don't know where to go from here either. To be honest, there's a legitimate point behind this trash talk, as the FT notes some analysts agree with Anssi that relying on Android as the universal OS may lead to "permanently low profitability" with users failing to distinguish among different brands if they all offer the same experience. Then again, tell that to HTC.

[Thanks, Maark]