Advertisement
Singapore markets closed
  • Straits Times Index

    3,280.10
    -7.65 (-0.23%)
     
  • Nikkei

    37,934.76
    +306.28 (+0.81%)
     
  • Hang Seng

    17,651.15
    +366.61 (+2.12%)
     
  • FTSE 100

    8,141.45
    +62.59 (+0.77%)
     
  • Bitcoin USD

    64,019.53
    +436.96 (+0.69%)
     
  • CMC Crypto 200

    1,342.95
    -53.59 (-3.73%)
     
  • S&P 500

    5,100.21
    +51.79 (+1.03%)
     
  • Dow

    38,242.70
    +156.90 (+0.41%)
     
  • Nasdaq

    15,906.60
    +294.84 (+1.89%)
     
  • Gold

    2,350.70
    +8.20 (+0.35%)
     
  • Crude Oil

    83.70
    +0.13 (+0.16%)
     
  • 10-Yr Bond

    4.6490
    -0.0570 (-1.21%)
     
  • FTSE Bursa Malaysia

    1,575.16
    +5.91 (+0.38%)
     
  • Jakarta Composite Index

    7,036.08
    -119.22 (-1.67%)
     
  • PSE Index

    6,628.75
    +53.87 (+0.82%)
     

Replica galleon at Burning Man festival not visual art, court says

By Dan Levine SAN FRANCISCO (Reuters) - A school bus transformed into a replica 16th century Spanish galleon for the Burning Man counter-cultural festival was not "visual art" that can be protected under U.S. law, a federal appeals court ruled on Wednesday. Simon Cheffins and Gregory Jones created the galleon, "La Contessa," by adding a facade, hull, decking and masts to a used school bus, according to the 9th U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals ruling. They assembled it at Burning Man, a festival held in the Black Rock Desert in northern Nevada that attracts artists and a large contingent of tech workers from Silicon Valley, among others. "La Contessa" first appeared at Burning Man in 2002 and provided rides, hosted weddings, served as a stage for poetry shows and as a centerpiece for a children's treasure hunt. The structure was eventually banned from Burning Man because "its unsafe driving practices far exceeded community tolerance and out-weighed the visual contribution it made," the ruling said. The galleon was eventually housed on private property, but in 2006 a new land owner intentionally burned it, the ruling said. Cheffins and Jones sued, but the 9th Circuit ruled that since "La Contessa" began as a school bus, and was continually used for utilitarian purposes, it was "applied art," not "visual art" eligible for protection under a U.S. law designed to give artists additional rights over their works. "While the 'La Contessa's' elaborate decorative elements may have had many artistic qualities, the 'La Contessa' retained a largely practical function even after it had been completed," the court ruled. An attorney for Cheffins and Jones could not immediately be reached for comment. (Reporting by Dan Levine; Editing by Dan Grebler)