Advertisement
Singapore markets closed
  • Straits Times Index

    3,290.70
    +24.75 (+0.76%)
     
  • Nikkei

    38,229.11
    +155.13 (+0.41%)
     
  • Hang Seng

    18,963.68
    +425.87 (+2.30%)
     
  • FTSE 100

    8,433.76
    +52.41 (+0.63%)
     
  • Bitcoin USD

    61,034.10
    -1,367.00 (-2.19%)
     
  • CMC Crypto 200

    1,263.03
    -94.98 (-6.99%)
     
  • S&P 500

    5,217.05
    +2.97 (+0.06%)
     
  • Dow

    39,484.16
    +96.40 (+0.24%)
     
  • Nasdaq

    16,321.05
    -25.22 (-0.15%)
     
  • Gold

    2,369.50
    +29.20 (+1.25%)
     
  • Crude Oil

    78.67
    -0.59 (-0.74%)
     
  • 10-Yr Bond

    4.4960
    +0.0470 (+1.06%)
     
  • FTSE Bursa Malaysia

    1,600.67
    -0.55 (-0.03%)
     
  • Jakarta Composite Index

    7,088.79
    -34.81 (-0.49%)
     
  • PSE Index

    6,511.93
    -30.53 (-0.47%)
     

EU exec says Motorola Mobility broke EU competition rules

BRUSSELS (Reuters) - The European Commission, the European Union's competition watchdog, ruled on Tuesday that Motorola Mobility broke EU competition rules by seeking an injunction against Apple (AAPL.O) on the basis of a smartphone patent.

"The so-called smartphone patent wars should not occur at the expense of consumers," EU Competition Commissioner Joaquin Almunia said in a statement.

"While patent holders should be fairly remunerated for the use of their intellectual property, implementers of such standards should also get access to standardised technology on fair, reasonable and non-discriminatory terms. It is by preserving this balance that consumers will continue to have access to a wide choice of inter-operable products," he said.

The Commission ruled that it was abusive for Motorola to seek an injunction against Apple in Germany on the basis of a patent it had committed to license. Apple had agreed to buy a licence and pay royalties.

ADVERTISEMENT

The Commission did not to impose a fine on Motorola because there is no case-law by the European Union Courts dealing with the legality of such injunctions and because national courts have so far reached different conclusions on this.

(Reporting By John O'Donnell and Jan Strupczewski)