Advertisement
Singapore markets closed
  • Straits Times Index

    3,176.51
    -11.15 (-0.35%)
     
  • Nikkei

    37,068.35
    -1,011.35 (-2.66%)
     
  • Hang Seng

    16,224.14
    -161.73 (-0.99%)
     
  • FTSE 100

    7,895.85
    +18.80 (+0.24%)
     
  • Bitcoin USD

    64,355.94
    +853.46 (+1.34%)
     
  • CMC Crypto 200

    1,334.09
    +21.46 (+1.64%)
     
  • S&P 500

    4,967.23
    -43.89 (-0.88%)
     
  • Dow

    37,986.40
    +211.02 (+0.56%)
     
  • Nasdaq

    15,282.01
    -319.49 (-2.05%)
     
  • Gold

    2,406.70
    +8.70 (+0.36%)
     
  • Crude Oil

    83.24
    +0.51 (+0.62%)
     
  • 10-Yr Bond

    4.6150
    -0.0320 (-0.69%)
     
  • FTSE Bursa Malaysia

    1,547.57
    +2.81 (+0.18%)
     
  • Jakarta Composite Index

    7,087.32
    -79.50 (-1.11%)
     
  • PSE Index

    6,443.00
    -80.19 (-1.23%)
     

Why Is PDC Energy Trading at a Premium to Its Peers?

Which Upstream Company Is a Good Bet amid Low Energy Prices?

(Continued from Prior Part)

Relative valuation

PDC Energy (PDCE) had the highest EV-to-adjusted EBITDA (enterprise value to adjusted earnings before interest, tax, depreciation, and amortization) ratio in 2015, at 10.1x. EV is the summation of a company’s market capitalization and net debt.

PDCE’s stock has risen 7% year-over-year (or YoY), while its net debt levels have remained flat. However, its adjusted trailing-12-month EBITDA rose by 52%. This helped to bring PDCE’s ratio below the previous year’s levels. It also helped drive PDCE’s stock higher. PDCE’s forward EV-to-EBITDA ratio is 7x.

Concho Resources’ (CXO) EV-to-adjusted EBITDA in 2015 was 9.8x. CXO’s stock has fallen 2.3% YoY, while its net debt levels have fallen ~13%. Its adjusted trailing-12-month EBITDA in 2015 was ~15% lower than 2014 levels. CXO’s forward EV-to-EBITDA multiple is 11.3x.

ADVERTISEMENT

Oasis Petroleum’s (OAS) EV-to-adjusted EBITDA in 2015 was ~8.9x. Its stock has fallen ~43% YoY, while its net debt has fallen by ~13%. However, OAS’s adjusted trailing-12-month EBITDA fell by 50%, which helped push the ratio higher than the previous year’s levels. OAS’s forward EV-to-EBITDA multiple is ~8.4X.

Meanwhile, Whiting Petroleum’s (WLL) EV-to-adjusted EBITDA in 2015 was ~6.3x. Its stock has fallen ~80% YoY, while its net debt has fallen by 6%. WLL’s adjusted trailing-12-month EBITDA fell by ~45%, which helped push the ratio higher than the previous year’s levels. The forward EV-to-EBITDA multiple for WLL is ~8.1x.

What do these ratios mean?

The higher forward EV-to-EBITDA multiples for CXO and WLL imply that Wall Street expects their respective EBITDAs to fall this year compared to the last 12 months. The lower forward EV-to-EBITDA multiples for PDCE and OAS imply that Wall Street expects their respective EBITDAs to rise this year compared to the last 12 months.

Mainly, PDCE trades at a premium to its peers due to its superior production, earnings, and leverage numbers.

All these companies make up 4.5% of the iShares U.S. Oil & Gas Exploration & Production ETF (IEO).

Continue to Next Part

Browse this series on Market Realist: