Yahoo Finance Why You Need To Look At This Factor Before Buying Nowoczesna Firma SA. (WSE:NFP)
For Nowoczesna Firma SA.’s (WSE:NFP) shareholders, and also potential investors in the stock, understanding how the stock’s risk and return characteristics can impact your portfolio is important. The beta measures NFP’s exposure to the wider market risk, which reflects changes in economic and political factors. Not every stock is exposed to the same level of market risk, and the broad market index represents a beta value of one. A stock with a beta greater than one is expected to exhibit higher volatility resulting from market-wide shocks compared to one with a beta below one.
See our latest analysis for Nowoczesna Firma
An interpretation of NFP’s beta
Nowoczesna Firma’s beta of 0.53 indicates that the company is less volatile relative to the diversified market portfolio. The stock will exhibit muted movements in both the downside and upside, in response to changing economic conditions, whereas the general market may move by a lot more. Based on this beta value, NFP appears to be a stock that an investor with a high-beta portfolio would look for to reduce risk exposure to the market.
Could NFP’s size and industry cause it to be more volatile?
A market capitalisation of ZŁ2.55M puts NFP in the category of small-cap stocks, which tends to possess higher beta than larger companies. Furthermore, the company operates in the internet industry, which has been found to have high sensitivity to market-wide shocks. Therefore, investors may expect high beta associated with small companies, as well as those operating in the internet industry, relative to those more well-established firms in a more defensive industry. This is an interesting conclusion, since both NFP’s size and industry indicates the stock should have a higher beta than it currently has. There may be a more fundamental driver which can explain this inconsistency, which we will examine below.
Is NFP’s cost structure indicative of a high beta?
An asset-heavy company tends to have a higher beta because the risk associated with running fixed assets during a downturn is highly expensive. I test NFP’s ratio of fixed assets to total assets in order to determine how high the risk is associated with this type of constraint. Given that fixed assets make up an insignificant portion of total assets, NFP doesn’t rely heavily upon these expensive, inflexible assets to run its business during downturns. Thus, we can expect NFP to be more stable in the face of market movements, relative to its peers of similar size but with a higher portion of fixed assets on their books. This is consistent with is current beta value which also indicates low volatility.
What this means for you:
You may reap the benefit of muted movements during times of economic decline by holding onto NFP. Its low fixed cost also means that, in terms of operating leverage, its costs are relatively malleable to preserve margins. What I have not mentioned in my article here are important company-specific fundamentals such as Nowoczesna Firma’s financial health and performance track record. I highly recommend you to complete your research by taking a look at the following:
Financial Health: Is NFP’s operations financially sustainable? Balance sheets can be hard to analyze, which is why we’ve done it for you. Check out our financial health checks here.
Past Track Record: Has NFP been consistently performing well irrespective of the ups and downs in the market? Go into more detail in the past performance analysis and take a look at the free visual representations of NFP’s historicals for more clarity.
Other High-Performing Stocks: Are there other stocks that provide better prospects with proven track records? Explore our free list of these great stocks here.
To help readers see pass the short term volatility of the financial market, we aim to bring you a long-term focused research analysis purely driven by fundamental data. Note that our analysis does not factor in the latest price sensitive company announcements.
The author is an independent contributor and at the time of publication had no position in the stocks mentioned.