Advertisement
Singapore markets open in 2 hours 50 minutes
  • Straits Times Index

    3,272.72
    +47.55 (+1.47%)
     
  • S&P 500

    5,070.55
    +59.95 (+1.20%)
     
  • Dow

    38,503.69
    +263.71 (+0.69%)
     
  • Nasdaq

    15,696.64
    +245.33 (+1.59%)
     
  • Bitcoin USD

    66,404.06
    -317.47 (-0.48%)
     
  • CMC Crypto 200

    1,426.91
    +12.15 (+0.86%)
     
  • FTSE 100

    8,044.81
    +20.94 (+0.26%)
     
  • Gold

    2,336.20
    -5.90 (-0.25%)
     
  • Crude Oil

    83.40
    +0.04 (+0.05%)
     
  • 10-Yr Bond

    4.5980
    -0.0250 (-0.54%)
     
  • Nikkei

    37,552.16
    +113.55 (+0.30%)
     
  • Hang Seng

    16,828.93
    +317.24 (+1.92%)
     
  • FTSE Bursa Malaysia

    1,561.64
    +2.05 (+0.13%)
     
  • Jakarta Composite Index

    7,110.81
    -7,073.82 (-49.87%)
     
  • PSE Index

    6,506.80
    +62.72 (+0.97%)
     

Research shows that hackers can use this everyday cellphone sensor to track your movements — and it's not GPS

Subway
Subway

(Flickr/Juan Gonzalez)

A newly-released academic paper suggests that even without tapping into a GPS hackers can learn your movements through your cellphone with shocking accuracy, according to the Daily Dot.

These findings come from Chinese researchers who were able to hack into users’ cellphones and use the device’s accelerometer — the sensor used to track your phone's tilt and motion — to pinpoint where they traveled on a Chinese subway system.

The underlying theory of the paper is that smartphone accelerometers can be used by hackers to create a blueprint of motion. That is, subway stations are connected by jerky tracks and no two subway station's connections are the same. Thus these researchers were able to record and analyze the "motion patterns" of trains to learn which certain set of motions correlated to which station.

ADVERTISEMENT

Every station has a unique fingerprint of motion, and if hackers learned to identify and recognize them they would be able to know where a person was just by analyzing the way their cellphone moved.

It may sound like it would take hackers a long time to learn the motion patterns for each station, but the researchers tracked people with over 85% accuracy and only collected data from "a few station intervals with obvious characteristics."

This paper presents a method to track people in places that were before considered impossible: Underground, where there likely is no cellphone reception.

Accelerometers are used in nearly every phone to give it the videogame-like ability to respond to tilt and motion. But mounting research has indicated that it also can be used for all forms of surveillance.

Of course, to do this hackers would need to figure out a way to remotely access the accelerometer and access its data. The most likely way would be to have users unknowingly download a malicious app that would then tap into the phone's sensor. When successfully done, it's difficult to detect if someone has hacked into an accelerometer — although one can usually tell by a heightened battery drain.

This isn’t the first time this internal device component was used for surveillance. In 2010, for instance, a Japanese company built a program that claimed to track employees’ movements via their cellphones’ accelerometers. This provided managers a way to know which users were goofing off, using the bathroom too often, talking to much at the water cooler, and generally wasting time.

Like this latest research, in that case the accelerometer was used in lieu of GPS and it was able to give employers shocking data about underling work patterns.

While a future of systematic accelerometer hacking may seem far off, the technology is advancing leaps and bounds. The subway tracking researchers write, "The results show that the inferring accuracy could read 89% and 92% if the user takes the metro for 4 and 6 stations, respectively."

So it looks like screenwriters may soon have to re-think future scenes where spies are stymied by targets escaping via underground transport.

NOW WATCH: We did the math: Is Uber really cheaper than a taxi?



More From Business Insider