Advertisement
Singapore markets closed
  • Straits Times Index

    3,224.01
    -27.70 (-0.85%)
     
  • Nikkei

    40,369.44
    +201.37 (+0.50%)
     
  • Hang Seng

    16,541.42
    +148.58 (+0.91%)
     
  • FTSE 100

    7,952.62
    +20.64 (+0.26%)
     
  • Bitcoin USD

    70,129.39
    -716.11 (-1.01%)
     
  • CMC Crypto 200

    885.54
    0.00 (0.00%)
     
  • S&P 500

    5,254.35
    +5.86 (+0.11%)
     
  • Dow

    39,807.37
    +47.29 (+0.12%)
     
  • Nasdaq

    16,379.46
    -20.06 (-0.12%)
     
  • Gold

    2,254.80
    +16.40 (+0.73%)
     
  • Crude Oil

    83.11
    -0.06 (-0.07%)
     
  • 10-Yr Bond

    4.2060
    +0.0100 (+0.24%)
     
  • FTSE Bursa Malaysia

    1,536.07
    +5.47 (+0.36%)
     
  • Jakarta Composite Index

    7,288.81
    -21.28 (-0.29%)
     
  • PSE Index

    6,903.53
    +5.36 (+0.08%)
     

Nam Cheong's client terminates vessel contract

The ship builder considers legal recourse.

Nam Cheong announced it has received a notice of cancellation dated 1 December 2016 from Petra Offshore Limited (POL), a wholly owned subsidiary of Perdana Petroleum Berhad in relation to the sale of one unit of Accommodation Work Barge, Hull No. 317 .

The vessel contract was entered into on 23 June 2014 between POL and Nam Cheong International Ltd (NCIL), a wholly owned subsidiary of Nam Cheong.

NCIL had responded to POL by a letter stating that the Vessel had been completed in accordance with the terms of the contract, and despite numerous notices issued to POL after the first Notice of Readiness was issued on 26 October 2016, POL had failed to respond or state their position in respect of the Vessel prior to the Cancellation Notice.

ADVERTISEMENT

The reply letter asserts that POL is in breach of the terms of the contract, by failing to respond to the list of closing documents provided to them, as well as the failure to have their representatives present at the shipyard to inspect and work out any punch list, as required under the Contract prior to taking delivery of the Vessel
.
Nam Cheong’s position is that the cancellation is devoid of legal basis, and in fact POL is in breach of the contract.

By reason of the wrongful cancellation by POL, and in view of the breach of the terms of the contract by POL, Nam Cheong treats the contract as terminated and the deposit paid is accordingly forfeited.

Further, all rights are reserved to claim damages against POL as may be legally advised.

The management notes that the termination of the Contract is expected to have an impact to the earnings of Nam Cheong for the financial year ending 31 December 2016, the extent of which cannot be conclusively ascertained at this juncture as it will depend on the outcome of any legal action against POL.



More From Singapore Business Review