Advertisement
Singapore markets closed
  • Straits Times Index

    3,272.72
    +47.55 (+1.47%)
     
  • S&P 500

    5,010.60
    +43.37 (+0.87%)
     
  • Dow

    38,239.98
    +253.58 (+0.67%)
     
  • Nasdaq

    15,451.31
    +169.30 (+1.11%)
     
  • Bitcoin USD

    65,979.42
    +124.82 (+0.19%)
     
  • CMC Crypto 200

    1,420.51
    +5.75 (+0.41%)
     
  • FTSE 100

    8,050.94
    +27.07 (+0.34%)
     
  • Gold

    2,316.20
    -30.20 (-1.29%)
     
  • Crude Oil

    81.34
    -0.56 (-0.68%)
     
  • 10-Yr Bond

    4.6230
    +0.0080 (+0.17%)
     
  • Nikkei

    37,552.16
    +113.55 (+0.30%)
     
  • Hang Seng

    16,828.93
    +317.24 (+1.92%)
     
  • FTSE Bursa Malaysia

    1,561.64
    +2.05 (+0.13%)
     
  • Jakarta Composite Index

    7,110.81
    +36.99 (+0.52%)
     
  • PSE Index

    6,506.80
    +62.72 (+0.97%)
     

EU lawmakers face opposition to softening bank rules on bad loans

FILE PHOTO: European Union flags are hung outside the European Commission headquarters in Brussels January 22, 2014. REUTERS/Yves Herman (Reuters)

By Francesco Guarascio

LUXEMBOURG (Reuters) - A vote by European Union lawmakers to soften capital rules for banks that offload large amounts of bad loans is meeting resistance and could be ditched, officials said, in what would be a blow to Italian lenders profiting from the planned reform.

Under a proposal adopted by the economic affairs committee of the European Parliament last Tuesday, EU banks that carry out "massive disposals" of non-performing loans, covering at least 15 percent of all defaulted debt, would be allowed to set aside less capital against losses.

The move is a "deviation from international standards" aimed at reducing banking risks, one European official told Reuters.

ADVERTISEMENT

The Parliament's vote amended a banking overhaul proposed by the European Commission that had been endorsed by the Council of EU finance ministers in May.

To become law, a final deal is needed among the three EU institutions, under trilateral talks due to begin in July.

A French official said the proposed changes "raised concerns". France and Germany, the two largest economies of the euro zone, played a key role in hammering out last month's banking compromise among finance ministers, after several months of inconclusive talks.

Several officials said the changes made by the parliament could derail the general deal and could be ditched at the talks beginning next month, but others acknowledged that negotiations were open-ended.

The EU assembly will have to confirm the vote of its economic affairs committee, a step seen as a formality as the general chamber usually backs votes passed in its committees.

The capital rules' waiver decided by lawmakers would favour banks that are most exposed to bad loans, reducing their losses if they proceed to mass sales of their impaired assets.

Large Italian banks stand to profit the most, as the provisions voted by the EU parliament are retroactive and would concern massive disposals carried out from November 23, 2016 for five years after the entry into force of the new rules.

Italy's largest bank Unicredit <CRDI.MI> and state-controlled Banca Monte dei Paschi <BMPS.MI> could benefit of the waiver as they have recently sold large stocks of their sour debt.

Although the purpose of the banking package is to reduce bank risks, the changes proposed by the parliament would allow lenders to set aside less buffer capital.

Other adopted amendments would lower capital buffers banks have to hold against mortgages and against loans to small companies.

The deal reached by EU finance ministers in May also introduced last-minute changes to the Commission's proposal that appear to run counter to lowering banking risks. Ministers agreed on more favourable terms for larger banks, in a move pushed by France, and for German cooperative lenders.

(Reporting by Francesco Guarascio; additional reporting by Stefano Bernabei in Rome; Editing by Jan Harvey)