Advertisement
Singapore markets close in 6 hours 52 minutes
  • Straits Times Index

    3,263.31
    -29.82 (-0.91%)
     
  • Nikkei

    37,771.10
    -688.98 (-1.79%)
     
  • Hang Seng

    17,183.11
    -18.16 (-0.11%)
     
  • FTSE 100

    8,040.38
    -4.43 (-0.06%)
     
  • Bitcoin USD

    64,101.55
    -2,587.34 (-3.88%)
     
  • CMC Crypto 200

    1,391.35
    -32.75 (-2.30%)
     
  • S&P 500

    5,071.63
    +1.08 (+0.02%)
     
  • Dow

    38,460.92
    -42.77 (-0.11%)
     
  • Nasdaq

    15,712.75
    +16.11 (+0.10%)
     
  • Gold

    2,330.10
    -8.30 (-0.35%)
     
  • Crude Oil

    82.60
    -0.21 (-0.25%)
     
  • 10-Yr Bond

    4.6520
    +0.0540 (+1.17%)
     
  • FTSE Bursa Malaysia

    1,572.15
    +0.67 (+0.04%)
     
  • Jakarta Composite Index

    7,174.53
    -7,110.81 (-49.78%)
     
  • PSE Index

    6,583.91
    +11.16 (+0.17%)
     

EU antitrust regulators reinforce case against Teva pay-for-delay deals

The logo of Teva Pharmaceutical Industries is seen during a news conference in Tel Aviv

By Foo Yun Chee

BRUSSELS (Reuters) - EU antitrust enforcers, boosted by recent court victories, on Monday reinforced their case against Israeli drugmaker Teva <TEVA.TA> over its deal with rival Cephalon to delay selling a generic version of its sleep disorder drug modafinil.

Three years ago, the European Commission said the company's cash payments deal with Cephalon as part of a settlement to end a lawsuit over alleged infringement of Cephalon's patents on the blockbuster drug may have jacked up the price of modafinil.

It sent a statement of objections, or charge sheet, outlining its concerns why the deal may be anti-competitive. Teva later acquired Cephalon in 2011.

ADVERTISEMENT

On Monday, the EU competition enforcer sent a supplementary charge sheet to Teva, clarifying why it considered that the objective of the pay-for-delay deal was to restrict competition. It also cited recent court judgments backing its stand.

Teva can be fined up to 10% of its global turnover if found guilty of breaching EU antitrust rules. Regulators on both sides of the Atlantic have fought a long-running battle with drugmakers against such deals.

(Reporting by Foo Yun Chee; editing by David Evans)