Singapore markets closed
  • Straits Times Index

    3,101.93
    +9.82 (+0.32%)
     
  • Nikkei

    28,029.57
    +276.20 (+1.00%)
     
  • Hang Seng

    23,766.69
    -22.24 (-0.09%)
     
  • FTSE 100

    7,122.32
    -6.89 (-0.10%)
     
  • BTC-USD

    49,615.96
    +2,849.56 (+6.09%)
     
  • CMC Crypto 200

    1,367.14
    -74.62 (-5.18%)
     
  • S&P 500

    4,538.43
    -38.67 (-0.84%)
     
  • Dow

    34,580.08
    -59.71 (-0.17%)
     
  • Nasdaq

    15,085.47
    -295.85 (-1.92%)
     
  • Gold

    1,782.10
    +21.40 (+1.22%)
     
  • Crude Oil

    66.22
    -0.28 (-0.42%)
     
  • 10-Yr Bond

    1.3430
    -0.1050 (-7.25%)
     
  • FTSE Bursa Malaysia

    1,501.74
    0.00 (0.00%)
     
  • Jakarta Composite Index

    6,538.51
    -45.31 (-0.69%)
     
  • PSE Index

    7,055.19
    +22.65 (+0.32%)
     

Epic Games opposes Apple's effort to pause antitrust trial orders

  • Oops!
    Something went wrong.
    Please try again later.
·1-min read
FILE PHOTO: Smartphone with Epic Games logo is seen in front of Apple logo in this illustration
In this article:
  • Oops!
    Something went wrong.
    Please try again later.

By Stephen Nellis 

  (Reuters) - "Fortnite" creator Epic Games on Friday opposed Apple Inc's efforts to put on hold orders handed down in an antitrust trial as a potentially lengthy appeals process plays out. 

  U.S. district Judge Yvonne Gonzalez Rogers in September struck down https://www.reuters.com/article/apple-epic-games-idTRNIKBN2G61IK some of the iPhone maker's App Store rules, including a prohibition on developers directing their users to other payment options beside Apple's in-app payment system, in a partial win for Epic and other app makers. 

  Apple has until Dec. 9 to comply with the injunction, but earlier this month the company said it will appeal the ruling and asked Gonzalez Rogers to put her order on hold as the appeals process, which could take more than a year, unfolds. 

  Epic on Friday argued in a court filing that Apple has not met the legal standard for that pause, which requires Apple show that it will be irreparably harmed by even temporarily complying with the order if the injunction is later reversed on appeal. 

  Epic said that Apple's positive comments about the ruling shortly after it landed, and its delay in asking for a pause, showed that it would not be harmed by enacting the orders. 

  "The public interest favors denying (Apple's request); an injunction is the only path to effective relief," Epic wrote. "History shows ... that in the absence of an injunction, Apple will not make any changes." 

  Apple did not immediately respond to a request for comment. 

  A hearing on Apple's request is set for Nov. 9. 

  (Reporting by Stephen Nellis in San Franicsco; Editing by Himani Sarkar) 

Our goal is to create a safe and engaging place for users to connect over interests and passions. In order to improve our community experience, we are temporarily suspending article commenting