Singapore markets open in 8 minutes
  • Straits Times Index

    3,041.29
    -79.29 (-2.54%)
     
  • S&P 500

    4,567.00
    -88.27 (-1.90%)
     
  • Dow

    34,483.72
    -652.22 (-1.86%)
     
  • Nasdaq

    15,537.69
    -245.14 (-1.55%)
     
  • BTC-USD

    57,559.64
    -65.98 (-0.11%)
     
  • CMC Crypto 200

    1,475.03
    +32.25 (+2.24%)
     
  • FTSE 100

    7,059.45
    -50.50 (-0.71%)
     
  • Gold

    1,777.60
    +1.10 (+0.06%)
     
  • Crude Oil

    66.66
    +0.48 (+0.73%)
     
  • 10-Yr Bond

    1.4430
    -0.0870 (-5.69%)
     
  • Nikkei

    27,833.89
    +12.13 (+0.04%)
     
  • Hang Seng

    23,475.26
    -376.98 (-1.58%)
     
  • FTSE Bursa Malaysia

    1,513.98
    +3.41 (+0.23%)
     
  • Jakarta Composite Index

    6,533.93
    -74.36 (-1.13%)
     
  • PSE Index

    7,200.88
    -77.56 (-1.07%)
     

Bragar Eagel & Squire, P.C. Reminds Investors That Class Action Lawsuits Have Been Filed Against D-Market, Gaotu, and Amarin and Encourages Investors to Contact the Firm

  • Oops!
    Something went wrong.
    Please try again later.
  • Oops!
    Something went wrong.
    Please try again later.
  • Oops!
    Something went wrong.
    Please try again later.
·3-min read
In this article:
  • Oops!
    Something went wrong.
    Please try again later.
  • Oops!
    Something went wrong.
    Please try again later.
  • Oops!
    Something went wrong.
    Please try again later.

NEW YORK, Oct. 27, 2021 (GLOBE NEWSWIRE) -- Bragar Eagel & Squire, P.C., a nationally recognized shareholder rights law firm, reminds investors that class actions have been commenced on behalf of stockholders of D-Market Electronic Services & Trading (NASDAQ: HEPS), Gaotu Techedu Inc. (NYSE: GOTU), and Amarin Corporation PLC (NASDAQ: AMRN). Stockholders have until the deadlines below to petition the court to serve as lead plaintiff. Additional information about each case can be found at the link provided.

D-Market Electronic Services & Trading (NASDAQ: HEPS)

Class Period: July 1, 2021 IPO

Lead Plaintiff Deadline: December 20, 2021

The Complaint alleges that the Registration Statement and Prospectus for the IPO (collectively, the “Registration Statement”) were materially false and misleading because they failed to disclose the following adverse facts that existed at the time of the IPO: (1) D-Market had suffered a sharp deceleration in operational and sales growth as consumers retreated from e-commerce offerings in 2Q21; (2) D-Market’s revenue growth had decreased to just 5% year-over-year growth in 2Q21, over 90% below the most recent growth rate highlighted in the Registration Statement; (3) D-Market’s GMV growth had decreased to just 38% year-over-year growth in 2Q21, less than half the most recent growth rate highlighted in the Registration Statement; and (4) as a result of the foregoing, at the time of the IPO, the Company’s business and financial prospects were not as strong as represented in the IPO Registration Statement.

For more information on the D-Market class action go to: https://bespc.com/cases/HEPS

Gaotu Techedu Inc. (NYSE: GOTU)

Class Period: March 22, 2021 to March 29, 2021

Lead Plaintiff Deadline: December 20, 2021

According to the lawsuit, Goldman Sachs Group Inc. and Morgan Stanley sold a large amount of Gaotu American Depository Shares (ADSs) during the Class Period while in possession of material non-public information about Archegos Capital Management (at the time a family office with $10 billion under management) and its need to fully liquidate its position in Gaotu because of margin call pressure. As a result of these sales, the defendants in the case, Goldman Sachs and Morgan Stanley, avoided billions in losses combined.

For more information on the Gaotu class action go to: https://bespc.com/cases/GOTU

Amarin Corporation PLC (NASDAQ: AMRN)

Class Period: December 5, 2018 to June 21, 2021

Lead Plaintiff Deadline: December 20, 2021

The complaint alleges that throughout the Class Period, Amarin and its senior executives made materially false and/or misleading statements and/or failed to disclose that: (1) there was an increasingly high risk that certain of Amarin’s patents would be invalidated; (2) once the District Court invalidated certain of Amarin’s patents, there was little to no chance of reversing that ruling; (3) Amarin’s litigation was preventing it from effectuating a successful takeover; and (4) Amarin was downplaying the true threat the ongoing ANDA litigation posed to the Company's business and future prospects.

For more information on the Amarin class action go to: https://bespc.com/cases/AMRN

About Bragar Eagel & Squire, P.C.:
Bragar Eagel & Squire, P.C. is a nationally recognized law firm with offices in New York, California, and South Carolina. The firm represents individual and institutional investors in commercial, securities, derivative, and other complex litigation in state and federal courts across the country. For more information about the firm, please visit www.bespc.com. Attorney advertising. Prior results do not guarantee similar outcomes.

Contact Information:
Bragar Eagel & Squire, P.C.
Brandon Walker, Esq.
Alexandra B. Raymond, Esq.
(212) 355-4648
investigations@bespc.com
www.bespc.com


Our goal is to create a safe and engaging place for users to connect over interests and passions. In order to improve our community experience, we are temporarily suspending article commenting