Singapore markets close in 4 hours 36 minutes
  • Straits Times Index

    2,506.93
    -16.38 (-0.65%)
     
  • Nikkei

    23,402.83
    -91.51 (-0.39%)
     
  • Hang Seng

    24,629.93
    -288.85 (-1.16%)
     
  • FTSE 100

    5,792.01
    -68.27 (-1.16%)
     
  • BTC-USD

    13,115.99
    +13.80 (+0.11%)
     
  • CMC Crypto 200

    261.39
    -2.02 (-0.77%)
     
  • S&P 500

    3,400.97
    -64.42 (-1.86%)
     
  • Dow

    27,685.38
    -650.19 (-2.29%)
     
  • Nasdaq

    11,358.94
    -189.34 (-1.64%)
     
  • Gold

    1,910.40
    +4.70 (+0.25%)
     
  • Crude Oil

    38.74
    +0.18 (+0.47%)
     
  • 10-Yr Bond

    0.8010
    -0.0400 (-4.76%)
     
  • FTSE Bursa Malaysia

    1,501.06
    +6.45 (+0.43%)
     
  • Jakarta Composite Index

    5,145.81
    +1.76 (+0.03%)
     
  • PSE Index

    6,413.75
    -77.44 (-1.19%)
     

Adelson’s Singapore casino hires law firm to probe US$1 billion in transfers

·4-min read
Singapore city, Singapore - february 26, 2020 : Marina Bay Sands hotel is an integrated resort fronting Marina Bay at night view in Singapore
Marina Bay Sands integrated resort in Singapore, 26 February 2020. (PHOTO: Getty Commercial)

By Chanyaporn Chanjaroen and Andrea Tan

(Bloomberg) -- Las Vegas Sands Corp.’s Singapore casino has hired a law firm to conduct a new investigation into employee transfers of more than US$1 billion in gamblers’ money to third parties, according to people familiar with the matter.

Davinder Singh Chambers LLC, which specialises in dispute resolution and international arbitration, was appointed after Singapore police began a probe of third-party transfers at Marina Bay Sands Ltd., said the people, who asked not to be identified discussing private matters.

The review by one of Singapore’s best-known law firms adds to scrutiny of the casino by the U.S. Department of Justice and Singapore authorities after a patron sued the firm last year alleging that S$9.1 million ($6.7 million) of his money was transferred to other gamblers without his knowledge. The lawsuit was settled out of court in June, with the casino agreeing to reimburse the full amount. There was a “non-admission” of liability from both sides.

Marina Bay Sands said in a statement that when issues regarding the handling of client transfers were raised, the company thoroughly reviewed the matter and concluded that no patron funds were transferred in a manner that was contrary to the client’s intent.

“MBS continues to work closely with its regulators to monitor MBS’s compliance with all legal obligations,” the casino said.

Las Vegas Sands dropped 4.2% in New York, after earlier plunging as much as 8.9%, the most since March. The shares were down 25% this year as of Tuesday’s close.

A representative for Davinder Singh Chambers declined to comment. The Singapore police force said it’s inappropriate to comment as investigations are ongoing.

The client lawsuit sparked scrutiny by a slew of authorities into how Marina Bay Sands handled and monitored third-party transfers. The transactions, when authorised, are legal and used by groups of wealthy gamblers in Asia to pool winnings and losses at different casinos.

The transfers are sometimes made through so-called junket operators, which provide transportation, hotels and credit to high rollers. In Macau, the junkets allow Chinese gamblers to get around strict capital controls by pledging assets on the mainland in exchange for credit at casinos.

While the junkets are generally more strictly controlled in Singapore, an earlier probe by Marina Bay Sands and the Hogan Lovells law firm found instances of employees not complying with proper standards by filling in payment details on pre-signed or photo-copied authorisation forms, according to the people. It also uncovered cases in which original documents were destroyed, the people said.

During the Hogan Lovells review covering 2013-2017, more than 3,000 letters of authorisation were used to endorse transfers of funds from patrons to third parties worth about S$1.4 billion, according to the people.

Las Vegas Sands’ Singapore unit, among the most profitable in billionaire Sheldon Adelson’s gaming empire, called on Hogan Lovells’ team that specialises in corporate investigations and contentious regulatory matters after the Casino Regulatory Authority started its probe following the 2019 lawsuit from patron Wang Xi.

The U.S. Attorney’s Office meanwhile interviewed a former compliance chief of Marina Bay Sands in July as part of the justice department’s probe into whether anti-money laundering procedures had been breached in handling high rollers, people familiar with the matter said.

Of the transactions scrutinised in the Hogan Lovells review, letters authorising transfers worth S$365 million from multiple patrons bore signatures that appeared to be similar, facilitating numerous transfers, one of the people said. One group of employees was involved in S$763 million in transfers. That concentration in just a handful of staff failed to draw the requisite attention, according to the person.

In a response to a Bloomberg News inquiry, the Casino Regulatory Authority said it has completed investigations into allegations that Marina Bay Sands carried out unauthorised transfers from a patron’s account. While the regulator concluded the casino didn’t breach requirements in that case -- including those relating to anti-money laundering -- “there were weaknesses in MBS’ casino control measures pertaining to fund transfers,” it said in a statement.

Close Oversight

The regulator “takes a serious view of such matters and had directed MBS to strengthen its control measures, which MBS has since undertaken,” according to the statement. “CRA will continue to exercise close oversight to ensure that MBS’ measures are effective.”

Marina Bay Sands told the regulator that it had strengthened its control process in April 2018 to ensure that gamblers authorise each fund transfer, and that the requests are approved by the casino’s compliance department, the person said. Employees also receive training to spot and report suspicious behaviour and any unlicensed junket-related activities.

Davinder Singh is well known for representing Singapore Prime Minister Lee Hsien Loong in a number of defamation cases, as well many other high-profile lawsuits over banking, debt restructuring and frauds. Hogan Lovells is known for its investigations and anti-corruption work.

(Updates with closing shares in sixth paragraph)

© 2020 Bloomberg L.P.